On the Fisher's Z transformation of correlation random fields

One of the most interesting problems studied in Random Field Theory (RFT) is to approximate the distribution of the maximum of a random field. This problem usually appears in a general hypothesis testing framework, where the statistics of interest are the maximum of a random field of a known distribution. In this paper, we use the RFT approach to compare two independent correlation random fields,R1 and R2. Our statistics of interest are the maximum of a random field G, resulting from the difference between the Fisher's Z transformation of R1 and R2, respectively. The Fisher's Z transformation guarantees a Gaussian distribution at each point of G but, unfortunately, G is not transformed into a Gaussian random field. Hence, standard results of RFT for Gaussian random fields are not longer available for G. We show here that the distribution of the maximum of G can still be approximated by the distribution of the maximum of a Gaussian random field, provided there is some correction by its spatial smoothness. Indeed, we present a general setting to obtain this correction. This is done by allowing different smoothness parameters for the components of G. Finally, the performance of our method is illustrated by means of both numerical simulations and real Electroencephalography data, recorded during a face recognition experimental paradigm.

[1]  A. M. Hasofer Upcrossings of Random Fields , 1978 .

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Applications of random field theory to functional connectivity , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Erik H. Vanmarcke,et al.  Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. , 1985 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Milton Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables , 1964 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Robust Smoothness Estimation in Statistical Parametric Maps Using Standardized Residuals from the General Linear Model , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[8]  K. Worsley,et al.  Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[9]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for functional network connectivity among spatially independent resting-state components in schizophrenia , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  R. Adler,et al.  The Geometry of Random Fields , 1982 .

[16]  R. Woods,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and the Scaled Subprofile Model Compared to Intersubject Averaging and Statistical Parametric Mapping: I. “Functional Connectivity” of the Human Motor System Studied with [15O]Water PET , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[17]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Partial correlation mapping of cognitive measure and cortical thickness in autism , 2004 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[20]  J. Kenney,et al.  Mathematics of statistics , 1940 .

[21]  R. Fisher 014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .

[22]  K. Worsley,et al.  The geometry of correlation fields with an application to functional connectivity of the brain , 1999 .

[23]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A method for multi-group inter-participant correlation: Abnormal synchrony in patients with schizophrenia during auditory target detection , 2008, NeuroImage.

[25]  K. Worsley,et al.  Random fields of multivariate test statistics, with applications to shape analysis , 2008, 0803.1708.

[26]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  K. Worsley,et al.  THE DETECTION OF LOCAL SHAPE CHANGES VIA THE GEOMETRY OF HOTELLING’S T 2 FIELDS 1 , 1999 .

[28]  J. Haxby,et al.  Brain functional connectivity changes as task difficulty is altered , 1996, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.