Circumvention of Pedestrians While Walking in Virtual and Physical Environments

Virtual environments (VEs) are increasingly used in the context of scientific inquiries and rehabilitation for tasks that are otherwise difficult to control or perform safely in physical environments (PEs), such as avoiding other pedestrians during locomotion. The usefulness of VEs, however, remains constrained by the extent to which they can elicit natural responses. The objectives of the study were to examine circumvention strategies in response to pedestrians approaching from different directions in the VE versus PE and to determine the effects of repeated practice on the circumvention strategies. Twelve participants were assessed over five blocks of eight trials that consisted of walking toward a target while circumventing pedestrians approaching from different directions (0°, ± 30° right or left or none) in the VE and the PE. Similar onset distances of circumvention strategy and preferred side of circumvention were observed between the two environments. Participants, however, maintained enlarged minimum distances from the interferer (13%) and walked slower (11.5%) in the VE. Repeated practice resulted in walking speed increments of 7.4% over the entire session that were similar in the VE versus PE. While the changes observed in VE may reflect the use of more cautious circumvention strategies, the similarities in strategies between the two environments and the advantages of VEs (e.g., controlled exposure, reproduction of ecologically valid conditions, and safety) suggest that virtual reality is a valuable tool to study visually guided locomotor tasks, such as pedestrian circumvention, and shows great potential for assessment and intervention in physical rehabilitation.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  G. J. Savelsbergh,et al.  Grasping tau. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  A. Stewart,et al.  Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[5]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Environmental Components of Mobility Disability in Community‐Living Older Persons , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  How We Avoid Collisions With Stationary and Moving Obstacles , 2004 .

[8]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[9]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[10]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Comparison of Two VR Platforms for Rehabilitation: Video Capture versus HMD , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[12]  Laura F. Fox,et al.  Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  C. Richards,et al.  The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. , 2005, Motor control.

[15]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Spatiotemporal gait deviations in a virtual reality environment. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[16]  Bradford J McFadyen,et al.  The circumvention of obstacles during walking in different environmental contexts: a comparison between older and younger adults. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[17]  Betty J. Mohler,et al.  The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments , 2006, APGV '06.

[18]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The Utility of a Virtual Reality Locomotion Interface for Studying Gait Behavior , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Does walking in a virtual environment induce unstable gait? An examination of vertical ground reaction forces. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[20]  Hao Lei,et al.  What is the minimum field of view required for efficient navigation? , 2007, Vision Research.

[21]  Philip W. Fink,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[22]  Bradford J McFadyen,et al.  Characteristics of personal space during obstacle circumvention in physical and virtual environments. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[23]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Behavioral Dynamics of Visually Guided Locomotion , 2008 .

[24]  David Waller,et al.  Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: effects of task and available sensory information. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[25]  N J Delleman,et al.  Effects of field-of-view restriction on manoeuvring in a 3-D environment , 2008, Ergonomics.

[26]  Aftab E Patla,et al.  Locomotor avoidance behaviours during a visually guided task involving an approaching object. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[27]  Peter K Kaiser,et al.  Prospective evaluation of visual acuity assessment: a comparison of snellen versus ETDRS charts in clinical practice (An AOS Thesis). , 2009, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[28]  Francesco Menegoni,et al.  Walking in an Immersive Virtual Reality , 2009, Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine.

[29]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The Effect of Viewing a Self-Avatar on Distance Judgments in an HMD-Based Virtual Environment , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[30]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Matching actual treadmill walking speed and visually perceived walking speed in a projection virtual environment , 2010, APGV '10.

[31]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Effect on Lower Spine Muscle Activation of Walking on a Narrow Beam in Virtual Reality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[32]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. , 2011, Physiotherapy.

[33]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Human locomotion through a multiple obstacle environment: strategy changes as a result of visual field limitation , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  J. Pettré,et al.  Minimal predicted distance: a common metric for collision avoidance during pairwise interactions between walkers. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[35]  Alexandra Kirsch,et al.  Strategies of locomotor collision avoidance. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[36]  Franck Multon,et al.  Biomechanics of Walking in Real World: Naturalness we Wish to Reach in Virtual Reality , 2013 .

[37]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  More than just perception–action recalibration: Walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[38]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[39]  D. Waller,et al.  Sensory Contributions to Spatial Knowledge of Real and Virtual Environments , 2013 .

[40]  Boris M. Velichkovsky,et al.  The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments - A review , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[41]  Daniel Vélez Día,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 2013 .

[42]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Adjustments of Speed and Path when Avoiding Collisions with Another Pedestrian , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  M M van der Krogt,et al.  Effects of adding a virtual reality environment to different modes of treadmill walking. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[44]  Meir Plotnik,et al.  Self-selected gait speed - over ground versus self-paced treadmill walking, a solution for a paradox , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[45]  Stefania Serafin,et al.  The effect of head mounted display weight and locomotion method on the perceived naturalness of virtual walking speeds , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[46]  Michael E Cinelli,et al.  Does the passability of apertures change when walking through human versus pole obstacles? , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[47]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Virtual proxemics: Locomotion in the presence of obstacles in large immersive projection environments , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[48]  Joyce Fung,et al.  Virtual Reality-Based Navigation Task to Reveal Obstacle Avoidance Performance in Individuals With Visuospatial Neglect , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[50]  J. Fung,et al.  Locomotor circumvention strategies are altered by stroke: I. Obstacle clearance , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[51]  Olivier Stasse,et al.  How do walkers avoid a mobile robot crossing their way? , 2016, Gait & posture.

[52]  Anne-Hélène Olivier,et al.  Walking with Virtual People: Evaluation of Locomotion Interfaces in Dynamic Environments , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[53]  Anouk Lamontagne,et al.  Healthy young adults implement distinctive avoidance strategies while walking and circumventing virtual human vs. non-human obstacles in a virtual environment. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[54]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Comparison of Two Methods for Improving Distance Perception in Virtual Reality , 2018, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..