Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents

Based on previous findings and theoretical considerations, it was suggested that bibliographic coupling could be combined with a cluster method to provide a method for science mapping, complementary to the prevailing co-citation cluster analytical method. The complete link cluster method was on theoretical grounds assumed to provide a suitable cluster method for this purpose. The objective of the study was to evaluate the proposed method's capability to identify coherent research themes. Applying a large multidisciplinary test bed comprising more than 600,000 articles and 17 million references, the proposed method was tested in accordance with two lines of mapping. In the first line of mapping, all significant (strong) links connecting ‘core documents’ (strongly and frequently coupled documents) in clusters with any other core document was mapped. This resulted in a depiction of all significant artificially broken links between core documents in a cluster and core documents extrinsic to that cluster. The second line of mapping involved the application of links between clusters only. They were used to successively merge clusters on two subsequent levels of fusion, where the first generation of clusters were considered objects for a second clustering, and the second generation of clusters gave rise to a final cluster fusion. Changes of cluster composition on the three levels were evaluated with regard to several variables. Findings showed that the proposed method could provide with valid depictions of current research, though some severe restrictions would adhere to its application.

[1]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[2]  A. F. J. van Raan,et al.  Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology , 1988 .

[3]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[4]  Graham K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[5]  M. M. Kessler.  Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .

[6]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  Subir K Sen,et al.  A mathematical extension of the idea of bibliographic coupling and its applications , 1983 .

[8]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Integration of textual content and link information for accurate clustering of science fields , 2006 .

[9]  M. M. Kessler.  Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and analytic subject indexing , 1965 .

[10]  Bo Jarneving.  The cognitive structure of current cardiovascular research , 2004, Scientometrics.

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level , 2005, Scientometrics.

[12]  J.E.J. Oberski,et al.  SOME STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF CO-CITATION CLUSTER ANALYSIS AND A JUDGMENT BY PHYSICISTS. , 1988 .

[13]  M. M. Kessler,et al.  An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers (Corresp.) , 1963, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  O. Persson.  The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990 , 1994 .

[15]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures II: Toward a Macro- and Microstructure for Science , 1974 .

[16]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[17]  M. A. Mubeen.  Bibliographic coupling : an empirical study of economics , 1995 .

[18]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects , 1991 .

[19]  B. A. Sharada,et al.  A study of bibliographic coupling in linguistic research , 1993 .

[20]  A. F. J. Van Raan,et al.  Cognitive Resemblance and Citation Relations in Chemical Engineering Publications. , 1995 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Various methods for the mapping of science , 1987, Scientometrics.

[22]  M. M. Kessler,et al.  Bibliographic coupling extended in time: Ten case histories , 1963, Inf. Storage Retr..

[23]  Jean-Charles Lamirel,et al.  New classification quality estimators for analysis of documentary information: Application to patent analysis and web mapping , 2004, Scientometrics.

[24]  Bella Hass Weinberg,et al.  Bibliographic coupling: A review , 1974, Inf. Storage Retr..

[25]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.