Expanded clinical observations in toxicity studies: historical perspectives and contemporary issues.

Recent or proposed changes in major testing guidelines require expanded clinical observations (ECOs) for a wide variety of toxicity studies in animals. ECOs supplement the simple cageside and hand-held observations traditionally employed during such studies. The new guidelines specify out-of-cage observations [e.g., posture, gait, and reactivity to various stimuli (e.g., auditory, tactile, noxious)] using defined scales and are intended as a Tier 1 screen for neurotoxicity. These new guidelines imply an elevation in the status of clinical observations to equivalency with other major categories of toxicity end points, such as anatomic and clinical pathology. The increased importance of neurological end points in routine studies indicates that there will be a need for many trained professionals to generate and interpret the results of ECOs. However, currently there is wide variation in the training and experience of individuals who conduct and interpret ECOs. The value of ECO data will be increased when industry standards for conducting and interpreting ECOs are systematized and elevated to the level of those for anatomic and clinical pathology.

[1]  R C MacPhail,et al.  The IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods. , 1997, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  R. R. Albee,et al.  A Performance Standard for Clinical and Functional Observational Battery Examinations of Rats , 1996 .

[3]  L. D. Morton Training in Veterinary Toxicologic Pathology , 1996 .

[4]  K. Weingand,et al.  Harmonization of animal clinical pathology testing in toxicity and safety studies. The Joint Scientific Committee for International Harmonization of Clinical Pathology Testing. , 1996, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[5]  M. F. Nolan Introduction to the Neurologic Examination , 1996 .

[6]  W. Slikker,et al.  Food and Drug Administration Proposed Guidelines for Neurotoxicological Testing of Food Chemicals. , 1996, Neurotoxicology.

[7]  J. Nold Registry of Toxicologic Pathology for Animals , 1995, Toxicologic pathology (Print).

[8]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Toxicologic Pathology: Modern Challenges and the Need for a New Educational Strategy , 1994 .

[9]  W. Haschek,et al.  Handbook of toxicologic pathology , 1991 .

[10]  V. Moser Screening Approaches to Neurotoxicity: A Functional Observational Battery , 1989 .

[11]  F. Quimby,et al.  The Clinical chemistry of laboratory animals , 1989 .

[12]  S. Ettinger Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine , 1989 .

[13]  M. Aminoff Neurology and General Medicine , 2007 .

[14]  H. Tilson Behavioral indices of neurotoxicity: what can be measured? , 1987, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[15]  J. Oliver,et al.  Handbook of veterinary neurologic diagnosis. , 1983 .

[16]  Miller Db,et al.  Trimethyltin, a selective limbic system neurotoxicant, impairs radial-arm maze performance. , 1982 .

[17]  Winford A. Gordon,et al.  Effects of scopolamine, pentobarbital, and amphetamine on radial arm maze performance in the rat , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[18]  D. Olton,et al.  Spatial memory deficit following fimbria-fornix lesions: Independent of time for stimulus processing , 1979, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  R. S. Jackson,et al.  Epidemic kepone poisoning in chemical workers. , 1978, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  B. Feingold Why Your Child Is Hyperactive , 1974 .

[21]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Peripheral neuropathy in a coated fabrics plant. , 1974, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[22]  P. Kennedy Pathology of domestic animals , 1970 .