Generic approach for deriving reliability and maintenance requirements through consideration of in-context customer objectives

Not all implementations of reliability are equally effective at providing customer and user benefit. Random system failure with no prior warning or failure accommodation will have an immediate, usually adverse impact on operation. Nevertheless, this approach to reliability, implicit in measurements such as failure rate and mean time between failures, is widely assumed without consideration of potential benefits of proactive maintenance. Similarly, it is easy to assume that improved maintainability is always a good thing. However, maintainability is only one option available to reduce the cost of ownership and reduce the impact of failure. This paper discusses a process for deriving optimized reliability and maintenance requirements through consideration of in-context customer objectives rather than a product in isolation.

[1]  Jeffrey Alun Jones,et al.  Modelling of maintenance, within discrete event simulation , 2002, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318).

[2]  Z. Vintr,et al.  Optimization of reliability requirements from manufacturer's point of view , 1999, Annual Reliability and Maintainability. Symposium. 1999 Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36283).

[3]  Cher Ming Tan,et al.  QFD implementation in a discrete semiconductor industry , 2002, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2002 Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37318).

[4]  C. J. Hockley,et al.  Setting the requirements for the Royal Air Force's next generation aircraft , 1997, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[5]  Jeffrey Alun Jones,et al.  The use of a discrete event simulation to model the achievement of maintenance free operating time for aerospace systems , 2001, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2001 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.01CH37179).

[6]  D. Deitz A set-based model of design , 1996 .

[7]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .