Multicenter P300 brain mapping of impaired attention to cues in hyperkinetic children.

OBJECTIVE To measure specific neurophysiological attention deficits in children with hyperkinetic disorders (HD; the ICD-10 diagnosis for severe and pervasive attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD]). METHOD In a multicenter sample of 148 children with HD and control children aged 8 to 14 years, event-related potential maps were recorded during a cued continuous performance test (A-X/O-X). Maps to cues (requiring attention but no response) and distractors and performance were tested for differences between age- and sex-matched HD and control groups (n = 57 each), as well as between clinics (n = 5). RESULTS The N1, P3a, and P3b maps revealed reliable attention effects, with larger amplitudes after cues than after distractors, and only minor differences across clinics. Children with HD missed more targets, made more false alarms, and had larger N1 followed by smaller P3b amplitudes after cues than did controls. Cue-P3b amplitude correlated with detecting subsequent targets. Cue-P3b tomography indicated posterior sources that were attenuated in children with HD. CONCLUSIONS Brain mapping indicates that children with HD attend to cues (preceding potential targets) with increased initial orienting (N1) followed by insufficient resource allocation (P3b). These multiple, condition-specific attention deficits in HD within 300 msec extend previous results on ADHD and underline the importance of high temporal resolution in mapping severe attention deficits.

[1]  T. Achenbach Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile , 1991 .

[2]  H. Engeland,et al.  Associations between event-related potentials and measures of attention and inhibition in the Continuous Performance Task in children with ADHD and normal controls. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[3]  D Brandeis,et al.  Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  J. T. Marsh,et al.  Continuous-processing-related event-related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , 1996, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Hypofrontality in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during higher-order motor control: a study with functional MRI. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[6]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[7]  B. Pennington,et al.  A neuropsychological examination of the underlying deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: frontal lobe versus right parietal lobe theories. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[8]  E Callaway,et al.  Scopolamine effects on visual information processing, attention, and event-related potential map latencies. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[9]  A. Fallgatter,et al.  Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Principles of spatial analysis , 1987 .

[11]  G H Glover,et al.  Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  E. Taylor,et al.  The Epidemiology of Childhood Hyperactivity , 1991 .

[13]  M Davies,et al.  The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): I. Preparation, field testing, interrater reliability, and acceptability. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[14]  Martin H. Schmidt,et al.  Atypical frontal brain activation in ADHD: preschool and elementary school boys and girls. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[15]  D Brandeis,et al.  Mapping brain electric micro-states in dyslexic children during reading. , 1994, Acta paedopsychiatrica.

[16]  B Renault,et al.  An event-related potential study of controlled and automatic processes in 6-8-year-old boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Three-Dimensional Localization of Electrical Sources in the Human Brain , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R. Singh,et al.  DSM-IV and ICD-10: a comparison of the correlates of ADHD and hyperkinetic disorder. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[19]  T. Yoshiura,et al.  Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[20]  R. D. Pascual-Marqui,et al.  The continuous performance test revisited with neuroelectric mapping: impaired orienting in children with attention deficits , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Auditory event-related potentials in attention and reading disabled boys. , 1986, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  G. Schulte-Körne,et al.  Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) bei Kindern mit hyperkinetischem Syndrom - eine experimentelle Untersuchung mittels des Continuous Performance Test (CPT) , 2000 .

[23]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Brain mapping of bilateral interactions in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.