Eliding the derivation: A minimalist formalization of ellipsis

In this paper I use the formal framework of minimalist grammars to implement a version of the traditional approach to ellipsis as ‘deletion under syntactic (derivational) identity’, which, in conjunction with canonical analyses of voice phenomena, immediately allows for voice mismatches in verb phrase ellipsis, but not in sluicing. This approach to ellipsis is naturally implemented in a parser by means of threading a state encoding a set of possible antecedent derivation contexts through the derivation tree. Similarities between ellipsis and pronominal resolution are easily stated in these terms. In the context of this implementation, two approaches to ellipsis in the transformational community are naturally seen as equivalent descriptions at different levels: the LF-copying approach to ellipsis resolution is best seen as a description of the parser, whereas the phonological deletion approach a description of the underlying relation between form and meaning.

[1]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  Importing Montagovian Dynamics into Minimalism , 2012, LACL.

[2]  Greg Kobele,et al.  Ellipsis: computation of. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[3]  Philip Wadler,et al.  Comprehending monads , 1990, LISP and Functional Programming.

[4]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Parsing minimalist languages , 2001 .

[5]  Laura Kallmeyer,et al.  Gapping through TAG derivation trees , 2010, TAG.

[6]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  A step-by-step guide to ellipsis resolution , 2001 .

[7]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[8]  Javier Martín González,et al.  Voice Mismatches in English and Spanish Sluicing , 2011 .

[9]  C. Clifton,et al.  Processing Elided Verb Phrases with Flawed Antecedents: the Recycling Hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[10]  Dale Gerdemann,et al.  Parsing as Tree Traversal , 1994, COLING.

[11]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[12]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  Syntactic identity in Survive-minimalism: Ellipsis and the derivational identity hypothesis , 2009 .

[13]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Strict Deterministic Aspects of Minimalist Grammars , 2005, LACL.

[14]  Daniel Götzmann.  Multiple Context-Free Grammars , 2007 .

[15]  Christopher Strachey,et al.  Continuations: A Mathematical Semantics for Handling Full Jumps , 2000, High. Order Symb. Comput..

[16]  Christopher Peacocke,et al.  Explanation in Computational Psychology: Language, Perception and Level 1.5 , 1986 .

[17]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[18]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α , 2001 .

[19]  J. Merchant.  An Asymmetry in Voice Mismatches in VP-Ellipsis and Pseudogapping , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Edward P. Stabler,et al.  Derivational Minimalism , 1996, LACL.

[21]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[22]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  An Automata-Theoretic Approach to Minimalism , 2007 .

[23]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  Voice Mismatch and Syntactic Identity , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Philippe de Groote,et al.  Towards a Montagovian Account of Dynamics , 2006 .

[25]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[26]  Joost Engelfriet,et al.  IO and OI. I , 1977, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[27]  Jens Michaelis,et al.  On Formal Properties of Minimalist Grammars , 2001 .

[28]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  Idioms and extended transducers , 2012, TAG.

[29]  J. Roger Hindley,et al.  Lambda-Calculus and Combinators: An Introduction , 2008 .

[30]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[31]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[32]  J. Engelfriet,et al.  IO and OI , 1975 .

[33]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[34]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Verb phrase ellipsis: form, meaning, and processing , 1993 .

[35]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[36]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Squibs and Discussions: Memoization in Top-Down Parsing , 1995, CL.

[37]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  Sandra Chung,et al.  Sluicing and the Lexicon: The Point of No Return , 2005 .

[39]  Nachum Dershowitz,et al.  When are Two Algorithms the Same? , 2008, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.

[40]  Gregory M. Kobele,et al.  The Acceptability Cline in VP Ellipsis , 2011 .

[41]  R. Lees.  The grammar of English nominalizations , 1960 .

[42]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Catenae: Introducing a Novel Unit of Syntactic Analysis , 2012 .