Measuring Person Perception Accuracy: Another Look at Self-Other Agreement

The analysis of self-other data for the study of person perception accuracy is illustrated and discussed. Length of acquaintance, length of cohabitation, and trait empathy were investigated for their moderating effects on person perception accuracy, defined as the level of self-other agreement. Self-other agreement was computed four ways. A trait-by-trait analysis was performed twice, first using the moderator variable to form subgroups from which self-other correlations within each trait were computed and then using the moderator as a continuous variable in a series of moderated multiple regressions. Next, a profile analysis was performed that isolated two accuracy components, implicit profile accuracy and ideographic accuracy, which were conceptually similar to Cronbach's stereotype accuracy and differential accuracy components. The analyses, taken together, provided a componential and informative (if not comprehensive) analysis regarding accuracy as it is manifest in self-peer agreement data. Sex and cohabitation length moderated accuracy whereas acquaintance length and trait empathy did not.

[1]  G. Ichheiser Introduction: Why We Are Often Blinded to "Obvious" Facts , 1949, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Assessing similarity between profiles. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  L. Cronbach Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  R. Taft,et al.  The ability to judge people. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Conceptual and methodological problems in interpersonal perception. , 1955, Psychological review.

[6]  P. F. Secord,et al.  Liking, Selective Interaction, and Misperception in Congruent Interpersonal Relations , 1962 .

[7]  R. Hogan,et al.  Development of an empathy scale. , 1969, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[8]  Daryl J. Bem,et al.  ON PREDICTING SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME: THE SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR , 1974 .

[9]  Robert Hogan,et al.  A role theoretical interpretation of personality scale item responses , 1978 .

[10]  Barbara Gregg,et al.  Human Assortative Mating and Genetic Equilibrium: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1980 .

[11]  D. Funder On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self–other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. , 1980 .

[12]  Douglas T. Kenrick,et al.  Personality traits and the eye of the beholder: Crossing some traditional philosophical boundaries in the search for consistency in all of the people. , 1980 .

[13]  C. Insko,et al.  The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one? , 1982 .

[14]  Robert D. Smither,et al.  The structure of empathy. , 1983 .

[15]  W. Swann,et al.  Quest for accuracy in person perception: a matter of pragmatics. , 1984, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity and Skills in Decoding Nonverbal Channels: The Value of Face Value , 1985 .

[17]  D. Jackson,et al.  Idiographic measurement strategies for personality and prediction: Some unredeemed promissory notes , 1985 .

[18]  D. Buss,et al.  Human Mate Selection , 2020 .

[19]  R. Riggio Assessment of Basic Social Skills , 1986 .

[20]  D. Funder,et al.  On the several facets of personality assessment: The case of social acuity. , 1986, Journal of personality.

[21]  R. Koestner,et al.  To predict some of the people some of the time: A reexamination of the moderator variable approach in personality theory. , 1988 .

[22]  A. Kruglanski The Psychology of Being "Right": The Problem of Accuracy in Social Perception and Cognition , 1989 .

[23]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  To predict some of the people some of the time: In search of moderators. , 1989 .

[24]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Stereotypes and Standards of Judgment , 1991 .

[25]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interpersonal Sensitivity in Teaching Interactions , 1991 .