Risk Factors for Complications Associated With Minimally Invasive Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND Few studies have reported the outcomes following minimally invasive medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) for correction of pes planovalgus deformities. METHODS Charts were retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive MDCO procedures by a single surgeon from 2013 to 2019 with more than 3 months of follow-up. A total of 160 consecutive patients who underwent 189 minimally invasive MDCO procedures were included in the study. Median follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range, 7-25 months). RESULTS Osteotomy healing complications were present in 7% of cases during the 6-year study period. A 12-month case cluster of osteotomy healing complications was observed. Healing complication rates were 28% during the cluster and 0.7% outside of the cluster. No definitive cause was found for the case cluster, although heat osteonecrosis from the burr was suspected to be involved. Osteotomy healing complications were significantly associated with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, female sex, current tobacco use, and higher body mass index (BMI). Healing complications were not associated with osteotomy technique or fixation type. Other complications included wound dehiscence (3%), surgical site infection (2%), transient nerve symptoms (6%), and persistent nerve symptoms (2%). Nerve symptoms were significantly associated with an increased number of concomitant procedures. CONCLUSION Patients with higher ASA classification, current tobacco use, and higher BMI were at higher risk for osteotomy healing complications after minimally invasive MDCO procedures. Patients were also more likely to develop nerve complications with more extensive surgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, retrospective case series.

[1]  K. Tang,et al.  Surgical procedures for treatment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity: a network meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[2]  K. Delank,et al.  Comparative Results of Percutaneous Calcaneal Osteotomy in Correction of Hindfoot Deformities , 2018, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  A. Veljkovic,et al.  Neurovascular and Clinical Outcomes of the Percutaneous Endoscopically Assisted Calcaneal Osteotomy (PECO) Technique to Correct Hindfoot Malalignment , 2018, Foot & ankle international.

[4]  C. Jowett,et al.  Minimally invasive versus open calcaneal osteotomies - Comparing the intraoperative parameters. , 2018, Foot.

[5]  A. Veljkovic,et al.  An Anatomic Study of the Percutaneous Endoscopically Assisted Calcaneal Osteotomy Technique to Correct Hindfoot Malalignment , 2017, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  S. Giannini,et al.  Surgical treatment of stage II posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction: ten-year clinical and radiographic results , 2017, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[7]  A. Amin,et al.  Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy: A cadaveric and clinical evaluation. , 2016, Foot and Ankle Surgery.

[8]  G. Guyton Minimally Invasive Osteotomies of the Calcaneus. , 2016, Foot and ankle clinics.

[9]  G. Guyton,et al.  Safe Zone for Neural Structures in Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy , 2015, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  E. Kheir,et al.  Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy Using Minimally Invasive Technique , 2015, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  M. Rogers,et al.  Complications of Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Osteotomy Versus Open Osteotomy , 2015, Foot & ankle international.

[12]  D. E. Lucas,et al.  Comparing Fixation Used for Calcaneal Displacement Osteotomies , 2015, Foot & ankle specialist.

[13]  A. Guha,et al.  Comparison of Three Different Fixation Methods of Calcaneal Osteotomies , 2013, Foot & ankle international.