Pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnosis using the interphase nucleus
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Liehr | U. Claussen | M. Ziegler | H. Starke | A. Heller | R. Hauschild | V. Beensen | Martin Hesse | Isabell Hartmann | Christine Kähler | Matthias Schmidt | Wolfgang Reiber
[1] V. Cirigliano,et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies , 2002, The Lancet.
[2] J. Epplen,et al. False‐negative finding in rapid interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic cells , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.
[3] B. Eiben,et al. Rapid Prenatal Diagnosis of Aneuploidies in Uncultured Amniocytes by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization , 1999, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.
[4] A. N. Lamb,et al. Overwhelming maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples from patients with oligohydramnios can lead to false prenatal interphase FISH results , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.
[5] B. Eiben,et al. A prospective comparative study on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of uncultured amniocytes and standard karyotype analysis , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.
[6] M. Martinez-frias,et al. Epidemiological characteristics of amniotic band sequence (ABS) and body wall complex (BWC): are they two different entities? , 1997, American journal of medical genetics.
[7] M. D'armiento,et al. Limb body wall complex: a critical review and a nosological proposal. , 1993, American journal of medical genetics.
[8] T. Liehr,et al. Translocation trisomy dup(21q) and free trisomy 21 can be distinguished by interphase-FISH. , 1999, International journal of molecular medicine.
[9] R. Vecchione,et al. Limb body wall complex: craniofacial defects as a distinctive factor. , 1996, Birth defects original article series.