Simple and statistically sound recommendations for analysing physical theories
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jonathan M. Cornell | C. Rogan | B. Allanach | Shehu S. Abdussalam | R. Trotta | L. Roszkowski | R. R. Austri | P. Bechtle | K. Desch | M. Hamer | P. Wienemann | A. Roeck | H. Flacher | M. Danninger | W. Porod | S. Heinemeyer | G. Weiglein | J. Ellis | K. Olive | Will Handley | F. Agocs | P. Athron | E. Bagnaschi | O. Buchmueller | J. Bhom | Sanjay Bloor | T. Bringmann | Andy Buckley | A. Butter | J. E. Camargo-Molina | M. Chrzaszcz | J. Blas | M. Dolan | H. Dreiner | O. Eberhardt | B. Farmer | M. Fedele | A. Fowlie | T. Gonzalo | Philip Grace | J. Harz | S. Hoof | Selim C. Hotinli | F. Kahlhoefer | K. Kowalska | A. Kvellestad | Miriam Lucio Martínez | F. Mahmoudi | D. M. Santos | G. Martinez | S. Mishima | A. Paul | M. Prim | A. Raklev | Janina J. Renk | Andre Scaffidi | P. Scott | E. M. Sessolo | T. Stefaniak | Patrick Stöcker | S. Trojanowski | Y. S. Tsai | J. V. D. Abeele | M. Valli | A. Vincent | Yang Zhang | L. Wu | Janice Conrad | Csaba Bal'azs | Christopher Rogan | Paul Jackson | Martin White | W. Su | A. Beniwal | M. Chrząszcz | M. Kramer | Kazuki Sakurai | A. Scaffidi | Ben Farmer | P. Jackson | K. Desch | Selim Hotinli | A. Paul | Fruzsina Julia Agocs
[1] D. Lakens. The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value , 2021, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[2] Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch'an,et al. A comparison of optimisation algorithms for high-dimensional particle and astrophysics applications , 2021, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[3] Gonzalo,et al. scikit-hep/iminuit: v1.5.4 , 2020 .
[4] K. Cranmer,et al. Simulation-Based Inference Methods for Particle Physics , 2020, Artificial Intelligence for High Energy Physics.
[5] Robert D. Cousins,et al. What is the likelihood function, and how is it used in particle physics? , 2020, 2010.00356.
[6] L. Lyons,et al. Reproducibility and Replication of Experimental Particle Physics Results , 2020, Issue 2.4, Fall 2020.
[7] R. B. Barreiro,et al. Planck 2018 results: V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods , 2020 .
[8] Christian P. Robert,et al. Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century , 2020, 2004.06425.
[9] David W. Miller,et al. Reinterpretation of LHC Results for New Physics: Status and recommendations after Run 2 , 2020, SciPost Physics.
[10] Jihyun Bhom,et al. HEPLike: An open source framework for experimental likelihood evaluation , 2020, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[11] Joel Nothman,et al. Author Correction: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2020, Nature Methods.
[12] Avrim Blum,et al. Foundations of Data Science , 2020 .
[13] J. Aalbers,et al. Searching for new phenomena with profile likelihood ratio tests , 2019, Nature Reviews Physics.
[14] M. Pierini,et al. HEPfit: a code for the combination of indirect and direct constraints on high energy physics models , 2019, The European Physical Journal C.
[15] T. Kuhr,et al. Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and $$\tau $$-lepton properties as of 2018 , 2019, The European Physical Journal C.
[16] Johannes L. Schönberger,et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2019, Nature Methods.
[17] Joel Nothman,et al. SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.
[18] Pietro Vischia,et al. Reporting results in High Energy Physics publications: A manifesto , 2019, Reviews in Physics.
[19] J. Speagle. dynesty: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[20] R. Cousins,et al. Lectures on Statistics in Theory: Prelude to Statistics in Practice. , 2018, 1807.05996.
[21] Peter Athron,et al. Impact of vacuum stability, perturbativity and XENON1T on global fits of \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.
[22] J. Lesgourgues,et al. MontePython 3: Boosted MCMC sampler and other features , 2018, Physics of the Dark Universe.
[23] Nicholas P. Holmes,et al. Justify your alpha , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.
[24] Jonathan M. Cornell,et al. GAMBIT: the global and modular beyond-the-standard-model inference tool , 2018, The European Physical Journal C.
[25] Jonathan M. Cornell,et al. GAMBIT: the global and modular beyond-the-standard-model inference tool , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.
[26] Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al. Data Analysis Recipes: Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2017, 1710.06068.
[27] David Gal,et al. Abandon Statistical Significance , 2017, The American Statistician.
[28] Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones,et al. Practical Bayesian Inference: A Primer for Physical Scientists , 2017 .
[29] J. Conrad,et al. Comparison of statistical sampling methods with ScannerBit, the GAMBIT scanning module , 2017, 1705.07959.
[30] C. Rogan,et al. ColliderBit: a GAMBIT module for the calculation of high-energy collider observables and likelihoods , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.
[31] Jonathan M. Cornell,et al. Global fits of GUT-scale SUSY models with GAMBIT , 2017, The European Physical Journal C.
[32] S. Goodman,et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations , 2016, European Journal of Epidemiology.
[33] Qiang Yuan,et al. LikeDM: Likelihood calculator of dark matter detection , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[34] P. O. Hulth,et al. Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry , 2016, 1601.00653.
[35] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[36] L. Rauch,et al. Dark matter direct-detection experiments , 2015, 1509.08767.
[37] M. P. Hobson,et al. polychord: nested sampling for cosmology , 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters.
[38] M. Baak,et al. The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC , 2014, The European Physical Journal C.
[39] Wolfgang von der Linden,et al. Bayesian Probability Theory: Applications in the Physical Sciences , 2014 .
[40] M. Baak,et al. The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC , 2014, 1407.3792.
[41] Paul A Murtaugh,et al. In defense of P values. , 2014, Ecology.
[42] Robert D. Cousins,et al. The Jeffreys–Lindley paradox and discovery criteria in high energy physics , 2013, Synthese.
[43] Louis Lyons,et al. Discovering the Significance of 5 sigma , 2013, 1310.1284.
[44] Gregory Schott,et al. Data Analysis in High Energy Physics: A Practical Guide to Statistical Methods , 2013 .
[45] K. Cranmer,et al. Erratum to: Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2013 .
[46] The Cms Collaboration. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC , 2012, 1207.7235.
[47] P. O. Hulth,et al. Use of event-level neutrino telescope data in global fits for theories of new physics , 2012, 1207.0810.
[48] L. Roszkowski,et al. The CMSSM Favoring New Territories: The Impact of New LHC Limits and a 125 GeV Higgs , 2012 .
[49] L. Roszkowski,et al. Constrained MSSM favoring new territories: the impact of new LHC limits and a 125 GeV Higgs boson , 2012, 1206.0264.
[50] P. Bechtle,et al. Constrained supersymmetry after two years of LHC data: a global view with Fittino , 2012, 1204.4199.
[51] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Random Search for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[52] Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al. emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.
[53] Vinesh Rajpaul,et al. Genetic algorithms in astronomy and astrophysics , 2012, ArXiv.
[54] R. Trotta,et al. Fundamental statistical limitations of future dark matter direct detection experiments , 2012, 1201.3631.
[55] A. Roeck,et al. Higgs and supersymmetry , 2011, 1112.3564.
[56] Andrew Gelman,et al. Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .
[57] F. Feroz,et al. A coverage study of the CMSSM based on ATLAS sensitivity using fast neural networks techniques , 2010, 1011.4306.
[58] P. Scott,et al. Statistical coverage for supersymmetric parameter estimation : a case study with direct detection of dark matter , 2010, 1011.4297.
[59] K. Cranmer,et al. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.
[60] E. Gross,et al. Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics , 2010, 1005.1891.
[61] R. Cousins,et al. Frequentist evaluation of intervals estimated for a binomial parameter and for the ratio of Poisson means , 2009, 0905.3831.
[62] F. Feroz,et al. MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.
[63] George Casella,et al. A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Subjective Recollections from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0808.2902.
[64] R. Cousins. Comment on "Bayesian analysis of pentaquark signals from CLAS data". , 2008, Physical review letters.
[65] S. Goodman. A dirty dozen: twelve p-value misconceptions. , 2008, Seminars in hematology.
[66] R. Trotta. Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology , 2008, 0803.4089.
[67] R. Hubbard,et al. Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing , 2008 .
[68] E. Wagenmakers. A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[69] C. Lester,et al. Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts , 2007, 0705.0487.
[70] John D. Hunter,et al. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.
[71] J. Skilling. Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation , 2006 .
[72] Tony O’Hagan. Bayes factors , 2006 .
[73] R. Trotta,et al. A Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of the CMSSM , 2006, hep-ph/0602028.
[74] G. Punzi. Ordering algorithms and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters , 2005, physics/0511202.
[75] George Woodworth,et al. Bayesian Reasoning in Data Analysis: A Critical Introduction , 2004 .
[76] Wolfgang A. Rolke,et al. Limits and confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters , 2004, physics/0403059.
[77] M. J. Bayarri,et al. Confusion Over Measures of Evidence (p's) Versus Errors (α's) in Classical Statistical Testing , 2003 .
[78] A. Read. Presentation of search results: the CLs technique , 2002 .
[79] Bertolt Brecht. The manifesto , 2002 .
[80] M. Ciuchini,et al. 2000 CKM-triangle analysis a critical review with updated experimental inputs and theoretical parameters , 2000, hep-ph/0012308.
[81] W. Jason Owen,et al. Statistical Data Analysis , 2000, Technometrics.
[82] Rainer Storn,et al. Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..
[83] R. Cousins,et al. A Unified Approach to the Classical Statistical Analysis of Small Signals , 1997, physics/9711021.
[84] L. Wasserman,et al. The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules , 1996 .
[85] M. Schervish. P Values: What They are and What They are Not , 1996 .
[86] Alan D. Martin,et al. Review of Particle Physics , 2018, Physical Review D.
[87] P. Charbonneau. Genetic algorithms in astronomy and astrophysics , 1995 .
[88] E. Greenfield. Critical pathways: what they are and what they are not. , 1995, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.
[89] A. W. Kemp,et al. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. , 1994 .
[90] J. Berger,et al. Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence , 1987 .
[91] Donald B. Rubin,et al. Efficiently Simulating the Coverage Properties of Interval Estimates , 1986 .
[92] C. D. Gelatt,et al. Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.
[93] F. James. Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics , 1973 .
[94] J. Dickey. The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location Parameters , 1971 .
[95] Edwin T. Jaynes,et al. Prior Probabilities , 1968, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.
[96] Richard Bellman,et al. Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.
[97] D. Lindley. A STATISTICAL PARADOX , 1957 .
[98] S. S. Wilks. The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .
[99] J. Neyman. Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability , 1937 .
[100] Simplified likelihood for the re-interpretation of public CMS results , 2017 .
[101] Christopher D. Chambers,et al. Redefine statistical significance , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.
[102] Tanja Hueber,et al. Statistics For Nuclear And Particle Physicists , 2016 .
[103] Doreen Eichel,et al. Data Analysis A Bayesian Tutorial , 2016 .
[104] Matan Gavish,et al. THE IRRECONCILABILITY OF P-VALUES AND EVIDENCE , 2010 .
[105] Phil Gregory,et al. Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: Probability theory as extended logic , 2005 .
[106] Dieter Gstach,et al. Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis , 2002 .
[107] S. Senn. Two cheers for P-values? , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and biostatistics.
[108] James O. Berger,et al. Objective Bayesian Methods for Model Selection: Introduction and Comparison , 2001 .
[109] R D Cousins,et al. Comments on methods for setting confidence limits , 2000 .
[110] Robert Cedergren,et al. Guided tour , 1990, Nature.
[111] Matts Roos,et al. MINUIT-a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations , 1984 .
[112] John A. Nelder,et al. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..
[113] H. H. Rosenbrock,et al. An Automatic Method for Finding the Greatest or Least Value of a Function , 1960, Comput. J..
[114] M. Kendall. Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.
[115] E. S. Pearson,et al. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses , 1933 .
[116] L. M. M.-T.. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.