Multivariate dynamical modelling of structural change during development

ABSTRACT Here we introduce a multivariate framework for characterising longitudinal changes in structural MRI using dynamical systems. The general approach enables modelling changes of states in multiple imaging biomarkers typically observed during brain development, plasticity, ageing and degeneration, e.g. regional gray matter volume of multiple regions of interest (ROIs). Structural brain states follow intrinsic dynamics according to a linear system with additional inputs accounting for potential driving forces of brain development. In particular, the inputs to the system are specified to account for known or latent developmental growth/decline factors, e.g. due to effects of growth hormones, puberty, or sudden behavioural changes etc. Because effects of developmental factors might be region‐specific, the sensitivity of each ROI to contributions of each factor is explicitly modelled. In addition to the external effects of developmental factors on regional change, the framework enables modelling and inference about directed (potentially reciprocal) interactions between brain regions, due to competition for space, or structural connectivity, and suchlike. This approach accounts for repeated measures in typical MRI studies of development and aging. Model inversion and posterior distributions are obtained using earlier established variational methods enabling Bayesian evidence‐based comparisons between various models of structural change. Using this approach we demonstrate dynamic cortical changes during brain maturation between 6 and 22 years of age using a large openly available longitudinal paediatric dataset with 637 scans from 289 individuals. In particular, we model volumetric changes in 26 bilateral ROIs, which cover large portions of cortical and subcortical gray matter. We account for (1) puberty‐related effects on gray matter regions; (2) effects of an early transient growth process with additional time‐lag parameter; (3) sexual dimorphism by modelling parameter differences between boys and girls. There is evidence that the regional pattern of sensitivity to dynamic hidden growth factors in late childhood is similar across genders and shows a consistent anterior‐posterior gradient with strongest impact to prefrontal cortex (PFC) brain changes. Finally, we demonstrate the potential of the framework to explore the coupling of structural changes across a priori defined subnetworks using an example of previously established resting state functional connectivity. HIGHLIGHTSMultivariate approach for structural changes in development using dynamical systems.States follow a system with inputs accounting for driving forces of development.Demonstrate dynamic gray matter changes during maturation between 6 and 22 years.Account for effects of puberty and estimate a hidden growth factor affecting PFC.Explore coupled structural change within/between two resting‐state fMRI networks.

[1]  G. Šimić,et al.  Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Jeffrey M Spielberg,et al.  The role of testosterone and estradiol in brain volume changes across adolescence: A longitudinal structural MRI study , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Eveline A. Crone,et al.  Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: Convergence across four longitudinal samples , 2016, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Dynamic Brain: From Spiking Neurons to Neural Masses and Cortical Fields , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Imaging patterns of brain development and their relationship to cognition. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Effective connectivity: Influence, causality and biophysical modeling , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping The Analysis Of Functional Brain Images , 2016 .

[11]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The NIH MRI study of normal brain development , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. Blakemore,et al.  The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network modeling for longitudinal brain morphometry , 2012, NeuroImage.

[14]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Jay N. Giedd,et al.  The influence of puberty on subcortical brain development , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Michael E Hasselmo,et al.  Malignant synaptic growth and Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, Future neurology.

[17]  B. Peterson,et al.  Normal Development of Brain Circuits , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[18]  Armin Raznahan,et al.  How Does Your Cortex Grow? , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  P C Hindmarsh,et al.  Performance of a new pubertal self-assessment questionnaire: a preliminary study. , 2001, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Lerch,et al.  Patterns of Coordinated Anatomical Change in Human Cortical Development: A Longitudinal Neuroimaging Study of Maturational Coupling , 2011, Neuron.

[22]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Lefévre,et al.  Are Developmental Trajectories of Cortical Folding Comparable Between Cross-sectional Datasets of Fetuses and Preterm Newborns? , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  A. Lutti,et al.  Advances in MRI-based computational neuroanatomy: from morphometry to in-vivo histology. , 2015, Current opinion in neurology.

[25]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[26]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Molecular nexopathies: a new paradigm of neurodegenerative disease , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Assessing parameter identifiability for dynamic causal modeling of fMRI data , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[28]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  William D. Penny,et al.  Annealed Importance Sampling for Neural Mass Models , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  A. C. Evans,et al.  The NIH MRI study of normal brain development: Gender-based differences in correlation of IQ with corticometric measures in healthy children aged 6 to 18 , 2009, NeuroImage.

[31]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of distributed electromagnetic responses , 2009, NeuroImage.

[32]  J. Lefévre,et al.  On the growth and form of cortical convolutions , 2016, Nature Physics.

[33]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Tau-mediated neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Gerard R. Ridgway,et al.  Symmetric Diffeomorphic Modeling of Longitudinal Structural MRI , 2013, Front. Neurosci..

[35]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Puberty-related influences on brain development , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Metropolis–Hastings algorithm for dynamic causal models , 2007, NeuroImage.

[37]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Total and regional brain volumes in a population-based normative sample from 4 to 18 years: the NIH MRI Study of Normal Brain Development. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Correlation among body height, intelligence, and brain gray matter volume in healthy children , 2012, NeuroImage.

[39]  George Richardson,et al.  Brain development and aging: Overlapping and unique patterns of change , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  William D. Penny,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Causal Models using AIC, BIC and Free Energy , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Estimating anatomical trajectories with Bayesian mixed-effects modeling , 2015 .

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Tractography-based priors for dynamic causal models , 2009, NeuroImage.

[43]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[44]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Trajectories of cortical thickness maturation in normal brain development — The importance of quality control procedures , 2016, NeuroImage.

[46]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Learning Imaging Biomarker Trajectories from Noisy Alzheimer's Disease Data Using a Bayesian Multilevel Model , 2014, BAMBI.

[47]  Nick C Fox,et al.  A data-driven model of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer's disease , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[48]  Jonathan E. Peelle,et al.  Adjusting for global effects in voxel-based morphometry: Gray matter decline in normal aging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[49]  H. Wilson.  Spikes, Decisions, and Actions: The Dynamical Foundations of Neuroscience , 1999 .

[50]  James D. Murray.  Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[51]  E. Maguire,et al.  Anterior hippocampus: the anatomy of perception, imagination and episodic memory , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  Brian Ingalls,et al.  Mathematical Modeling in Systems Biology: An Introduction , 2013 .

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Structural Covariance in the Human Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  David P. Wipf,et al.  A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[55]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  Event time analysis of longitudinal neuroimage data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[56]  Radford M. Neal.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Computational psychiatry , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  K. Stephan,et al.  Translational Perspectives for Computational Neuroimaging , 2015, Neuron.

[59]  M. Jorge Cardoso,et al.  Bayesian and grAphical Models for Biomedical Imaging , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[60]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[61]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[62]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[63]  Dorret I. Boomsma,et al.  Longitudinal Development of Hormone Levels and Grey Matter Density in 9 and 12-Year-Old Twins , 2015, Behavior genetics.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Gradient-based MCMC samplers for dynamic causal modelling , 2016, NeuroImage.

[65]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  An event-based model for disease progression and its application in familial Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease , 2012, NeuroImage.

[66]  Matthew J. Beal.  Variational algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference , 2003 .

[67]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Bifurcation Analysis of Jansen's Neural Mass Model , 2006, Neural Computation.

[68]  Lara M. Wierenga,et al.  Unique developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area , 2014, NeuroImage.

[69]  K. Mills,et al.  Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development , 2014, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Adeel Razi,et al.  Bayesian model reduction and empirical Bayes for group (DCM) studies , 2016, NeuroImage.

[71]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  A new method for structural volume analysis of longitudinal brain MRI data and its application in studying the growth trajectories of anatomical brain structures in childhood , 2013, NeuroImage.