Future Scenarios as a Tool for Collaboration in Forest Communities

Forest devolution is meant to provide communities with greater decision-making power over the use and future of tropical forests. However, devolution policies have not always had the intended e ect; in some cases they have caused or furthered the disenfranchisement of the poor, the creation of open access con- ditions, resource conflict and forest degradation. These problems are likely to arise when forest communities are at a disadvantage when interacting with other local players and are unprepared for their new opportunities and responsibilities due to their physical remoteness, cultural isolation, low literacy rates or lack of experience in formal planning and negotiation. This paper discusses how a participatory method to facilitate thinking about the future - called future scenarios - can help change the way forest communities and local governments interact. The paper reviews a growing body of literature on future scenarios and shares first-hand experiences with future scenarios in forest communities in the northern Bolivian Amazon and the central provinces of Vietnam. It finds that under the right conditions, the use of future scenarios allows forest communities to collaborate more e ectively with local government, better assume responsibilities when given control over forests under devolution schemes and self-organize to benefit from the opportunities that communal control over forests o ers. Future scenarios help communities think about dependency, vulnerabilities and ways to prepare for the future; the methods develop organizational capacity and encourage internal democratic pro- cesses and planning. Community leaders become more vocal and assertive in meetings with local government, and marginalized groups within communities, such as women or the poorest segments, make their voices heard. However, the methods are less e ective when facilitation skills are not available or where government or other interests are threatened by local constituents. Future scenarios are not without their pitfalls and do not work in all situations, but given the appropriate context they can create "break-through moments" that improve collaboration between communities and local o cials.

[1]  Carol J. Pierce Colfer,et al.  The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management , 2005 .

[2]  B. Campbell,et al.  Building future scenarios and uncovering persisting challenges of participatory forest management in Chilimo Forest, Central Ethiopia. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  M. Chapin.  A Challenge to Conservationists , 2004 .

[4]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development , 2006 .

[5]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios : Uncharted Waters Ahead , 1996 .

[6]  J. Alcamo,et al.  Scenarios as Tools for International Environmental Assessments , 2002 .

[7]  Rights and Resources Initiative.  Seeing people through the trees : scaling up efforts to advance rights and address poverty, conflict and climate change , 2008 .

[8]  W. Sunderlin,et al.  From Exclusion to Ownership?: Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform , 2008 .

[9]  Dale S. Rothman,et al.  Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: An insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean , 2007 .

[10]  Thomas Sikor,et al.  Analyzing community-based forestry: local, political and agrarian perspectives , 2006 .

[11]  Eva K. Wollenberg,et al.  Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management , 2001 .

[12]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[13]  Ian D. Bishop,et al.  Exploring landscape changes using an envisioning system in rural community workshops , 2007 .

[14]  G. Limberg,et al.  Facilitating cooperation during times of chaos: spontaneous orders and muddling through in Malinau , 2007 .

[15]  Eva K. Wollenberg,et al.  Anticipating change: Scenarios as a tool for adaptive forest management. , 2000 .

[16]  Peggy Holman,et al.  The Change Handbook: Group Methods for Shaping the Future , 2007 .

[17]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Learning from the Future: Competitive Foresight Scenarios: Editors Liam Fahey and Robert M. Randall, John Wiley (1998), 446 pp., £27.50 , 1998 .

[18]  D. Davis Case,et al.  The community's toolbox. The idea, methods and tools for participatory assessment, monitoring and evaluation in community forestry , 1990 .

[19]  P. Cronkleton,et al.  Environmental governance and the emergence of forest-based social movements. , 2008 .

[20]  Anna Lawrence,et al.  The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes , 2007 .

[21]  Erin Bohensky,et al.  Young Scholars Dialogue, part of a Special Feature on Scenarios of global ecosystem services Linking Futures across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios , 2007 .

[22]  B. Richardson.  Local Forest Management: The Impacts of Devolution Policies , 2005 .

[23]  A. M. Stearman.  One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Sirionó and Yuquí Community Forestry Projects in the Bolivian Amazon , 2006 .

[24]  D. Bray,et al.  The Community Forests of Mexico , 2005 .

[25]  D. Edmunds,et al.  Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests , 2000 .

[26]  D. Mosse,et al.  'People's knowledge', participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development. , 2001 .

[27]  N. Nemarundwe,et al.  Future scenarios as an instrument for forest management: manual for training facilitators of future scenarios , 2003 .

[28]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources , 2006 .

[29]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[30]  Garry D. Brewer,et al.  Inventing the future: scenarios, imagination, mastery and control , 2007 .

[31]  Peter Cronkleton,et al.  Field guide to the future: four ways for communities to think ahead , 2006 .

[32]  P. Durst,et al.  Decentralization and devolution of forest management in Asia and the Pacific. Papers from an international seminar, Davao City, Philippines, 30 November-4 December 1998. , 2000 .

[33]  Frank Biermann.  Knowledge for the sustainability transition: the challenge for Social Science , 2004 .

[34]  Lutz E. Schlange.  Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[35]  Robert Fildes.  Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  Dennis Gabor,et al.  Inventing the Future , 1963 .

[37]  P. Thongbai,et al.  Participatory Scenarios for Sustainable Management of an ASB Benchmark site in Thailand: The case of Mae Kong Kha Sub- watershed of Mae Chaem Watershed , 2007 .

[38]  R. Fisher.  Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development , 1995 .

[39]  C. Colfer,et al.  People managing forests: the links between human well-being and sustainability. , 2001 .

[40]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: an overview , 2005 .

[41]  D. Russell.  The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty and Adaptive Collaborative Management , 2007, Journal of Ethnobiology.

[42]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Proceedings of the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: knowledge for the sustainable transition - the challenge for Social Science , 2004 .

[43]  S. Velarde,et al.  Preparing for a Changing Environment: Using Scenarios for Environmental Education , 2007 .