Entropy analysis for identifying significant parameters for seismic soil liquefaction

A novel application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique to seismic soil liquefaction, a complex problem in earthquake geotechnical engineering, is presented. Seismic soil liquefaction depends on a diversified set of physical parameters with highly non-linear interconnections. Factors governing liquefaction may broadly be grouped as seismic parameters, site conditions and primarily dynamic soil properties, as the stimulus itself is manifestly dynamic. Each of these factors incorporates a wide range of variety of parameters that characterize liquefaction, to a varying degree of significance, such as: the magnitude, effective overburden pressure, shear modulus, normalized standard penetration blow count [N1]60, etc. Estimating rapid, yet accurate and reliable liquefaction susceptibility requires identification of the most significant factors controlling liquefaction. Thus a new concept of extracting significant parameters and gauging their importance is carried out by assigning them weights by applying MCDM introduced herein, whose evaluation is accomplished by means of an ‘entropy method’. In line with this, a relative reliability risk index (R3I) is computed indicating the ranking that directly reflects the severity of risk for liquefaction. Although the entropy analysis is carried out separately for the three multivariate criteria, it is remarkable that the R3I evaluated for each of these gives consistent ranking.

[1]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATING SOIL LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL , 1971 .

[2]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[3]  Lianyang Zhang,et al.  A simple method for evaluating liquefaction potential from shear wave velocity , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[5]  G. Mamtani,et al.  Reliability Risk Evaluation during the Conceptual Design Phase , 2006 .

[6]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Closure of "Soil Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility Evaluation for Level Ground during Earthquakes" , 1979 .

[7]  M H BAGHERIPOUR,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on reliability method , 2012, Journal of Earth System Science.

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[9]  W. D. Liam Finn,et al.  State of the art for the evaluation of seismic liquefaction potential , 2002 .

[10]  Turan Erden,et al.  Analysis of earthquake parameters to generate hazard maps by integrating AHP and GIS for Küçükçekmece region , 2012 .

[11]  W. F. Marcuson,et al.  Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils , 2001 .

[12]  Riley M. Chung,et al.  Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations , 1985 .

[13]  Snehal R. Pathak,et al.  EVALUATION OF TRIGGERING ACCELERATION REQUIRED FOR COMMENCEMENT OF LIQUEFACTION , 2005 .

[14]  Shuh-Gi Chern,et al.  CPT-BASED LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT BY USING FUZZY-NEURAL NETWORK , 2008 .

[15]  Orazio Giustolisi,et al.  Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT results using evolutionary polynomial regression , 2010 .

[16]  Stanley Zionts,et al.  Multiple criteria mathematical programming: an updated overview and several approaches , 1988 .

[17]  B. B. Ahuja,et al.  Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology Vendor Selection in Supply Chain Using Relative Reliability Risk Evaluation , 2022 .

[18]  Pijush Samui,et al.  Machine learning modelling for predicting soil liquefaction susceptibility , 2011 .

[19]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data , 1983 .

[20]  Shuh-Gi Chern,et al.  CPT-Based Simplified Liquefaction Assessment by Using Fuzzy-Neural Network , 2009 .