Kinematic Validation of a Multi-Kinect v2 Instrumented 10-Meter Walkway for Quantitative Gait Assessments

Walking ability is frequently assessed with the 10-meter walking test (10MWT), which may be instrumented with multiple Kinect v2 sensors to complement the typical stopwatch-based time to walk 10 meters with quantitative gait information derived from Kinect’s 3D body point’s time series. The current study aimed to evaluate a multi-Kinect v2 set-up for quantitative gait assessments during the 10MWT against a gold-standard motion-registration system by determining between-systems agreement for body point’s time series, spatiotemporal gait parameters and the time to walk 10 meters. To this end, the 10MWT was conducted at comfortable and maximum walking speed, while 3D full-body kinematics was concurrently recorded with the multi-Kinect v2 set-up and the Optotrak motion-registration system (i.e., the gold standard). Between-systems agreement for body point’s time series was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Between-systems agreement was similarly determined for the gait parameters’ walking speed, cadence, step length, stride length, step width, step time, stride time (all obtained for the intermediate 6 meters) and the time to walk 10 meters, complemented by Bland-Altman’s bias and limits of agreement. Body point’s time series agreed well between the motion-registration systems, particularly so for body points in motion. For both comfortable and maximum walking speeds, the between-systems agreement for the time to walk 10 meters and all gait parameters except step width was high (ICC ≥ 0.888), with negligible biases and narrow limits of agreement. Hence, body point’s time series and gait parameters obtained with a multi-Kinect v2 set-up match well with those derived with a gold standard in 3D measurement accuracy. Future studies are recommended to test the clinical utility of the multi-Kinect v2 set-up to automate 10MWT assessments, thereby complementing the time to walk 10 meters with reliable spatiotemporal gait parameters obtained objectively in a quick, unobtrusive and patient-friendly manner.

[1]  Carolynn Patten,et al.  Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect for assessment of standing balance and postural control. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[3]  R. Lipton,et al.  Quantitative gait markers and incident fall risk in older adults. , 2009, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[4]  S. Studenski,et al.  Meaningful Change and Responsiveness in Common Physical Performance Measures in Older Adults , 2006, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  François Charpillet,et al.  A gait analysis method based on a depth camera for fall prevention , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  M. Inzitari,et al.  Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force , 2009, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[7]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  How to Sync to the Beat of a Persistent Fractal Metronome without Falling Off the Treadmill? , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. , 1990, Computers in biology and medicine.

[9]  Lindy Clemson,et al.  Predictors of Injurious Falls and Fear of Falling Differ , 2015, Journal of aging and health.

[10]  Ran Gilad-Bachrach,et al.  Full body gait analysis with Kinect , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  D. Brooks,et al.  Reference values for standardized tests of walking speed and distance: a systematic review. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[12]  Kelly J. Bower,et al.  Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of spatiotemporal gait variables. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Sheldon R Simon,et al.  Quantification of human motion: gait analysis-benefits and limitations to its application to clinical problems. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  M. Montero‐Odasso,et al.  Gait velocity as a single predictor of adverse events in healthy seniors aged 75 years and older. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[15]  S. Studenski,et al.  Gait speed and survival in older adults. , 2011, JAMA.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[17]  Linda Denehy,et al.  Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[18]  P. Olivier,et al.  Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[19]  J S Higginson,et al.  Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[20]  D. Cicchetti Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology. , 1994 .

[21]  K. McGraw,et al.  Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .

[22]  Ross A Clark,et al.  Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Tien-Lung Sun,et al.  An Impact Study of the Design of Exergaming Parameters on Body Intensity from Objective and Gameplay-Based Player Experience Perspectives, Based on Balance Training Exergame , 2013, PloS one.

[24]  L. Lipsitz,et al.  The Nonlinear Relationship Between Gait Speed and Falls: The Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect, and Zest in the Elderly of Boston Study , 2011, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  Kitsunezaki Naofumi,et al.  KINECT applications for the physical rehabilitation , 2012 .

[26]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment , 2011, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[27]  James E. Graham,et al.  Assessing walking speed in clinical research: a systematic review. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[28]  Bart Vanrumste,et al.  Validation of the kinect for gait analysis using the GAITRite walkway , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Erienne V. Olesh,et al.  Automated Assessment of Upper Extremity Movement Impairment due to Stroke , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  StoneErik,et al.  Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for in-home gait assessment , 2011 .

[31]  Kade Paterson,et al.  Instrumenting gait assessment using the Kinect in people living with stroke: reliability and association with balance tests , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[33]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Evaluation of an inexpensive depth camera for passive in-home fall risk assessment , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth) and Workshops.