Advantages of MCNPX-Based Lattice Tally over Mesh Tally in High-Speed Monte Carlo Dose Reconstruction for Proton Radiotherapy

Monte Carlo simulations are increasingly used to reconstruct dose distributions in radiotherapy research studies. Many studies have used the MCNPX Monte Carlo code with a mesh tally for dose reconstructions. However, when the number of voxels in the simulated patient anatomy is large, the computation time for a mesh tally can become prohibitively long. The purpose of this work was to test the feasibility of using lattice tally instead of mesh tally for whole-body dose reconstructions. We did this by comparing the dosimetric accuracy and computation time of lattice tallies with those of mesh tallies for craniospinal proton irradiation. The two tally methods generated nearly identical dosimetric results, within 1% in dose and within 1 mm distance-to-agreement for 99% of the voxels. For a typical craniospinal proton treatment field, simulation speed was 4 to 17 times faster using the lattice tally than using the mesh tally, depending on the numbers of proton histories and voxels. We conclude that the lattice tally is an acceptable substitute for the mesh tally in dose reconstruction, making it a suitable potential candidate for clinical treatment planning.

[1]  P Chauvel,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of a protontherapy platform devoted to ocular melanoma. , 2005, Medical physics.

[2]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations for configuring and testing an analytical proton dose-calculation algorithm , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  R. Mohan,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetric impact of radiopaque fiducial markers for proton radiotherapy of the prostate , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  R. Mohan,et al.  The risk of developing a second cancer after receiving craniospinal proton irradiation , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  M. Tadokoro,et al.  Measurement of neutron dose distribution for a passive scattering nozzle at the Proton Medical Research Center (PMRC) , 2006 .

[7]  John S. Hendricks,et al.  Importance estimation in forward Monte Carlo calculations , 1984 .

[8]  Marco Durante,et al.  Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[9]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Stray radiation dose and second cancer risk for a pediatric patient receiving craniospinal irradiation with proton beams , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jean-François Chatal,et al.  COMPUTER TIME (CPU) COMPARISON OF SEVERAL INPUT FILE FORMATS CONSIDERING DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF MCNPX IN CASE OF PERSPONALISED VOXEL-BASED DOSIMETRY , 2006 .

[11]  E. Benton,et al.  Leakage and scatter radiation from a double scattering based proton beamline. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  R. Mohan,et al.  Monte carlo proton radiation therapy planning calculations , 2008 .

[13]  D. R. White,et al.  The composition of body tissues. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  R. Mohan,et al.  Monte Carlo study of neutron dose equivalent during passive scattering proton therapy , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Neutron equivalent doses and associated lifetime cancer incidence risks for head & neck and spinal proton therapy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[17]  H. G. Hughes,et al.  Cross-Section Evaluations to 150 MeV for Accelerator-Driven Systems and Implementation in MCNPX , 1999 .

[18]  D. Followill,et al.  Estimate of the uncertainties in the relative risk of secondary malignant neoplasms following proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  K. Coombes,et al.  Monte Carlo calculations and measurements of absorbed dose per monitor unit for the treatment of uveal melanoma with proton therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.