Genetically assisted optimization of cell layout and material flow path skeleton

A continuous plane manufacturing cell layout and intercell flow path skeleton problem formulation involving rectilinear distances between cell input/output stations is mapped to a genetic search space. Certain properties of such a search space are exploited to design a very efficient method for reduction of a mixed-integer programming problem formulation to an iterative sequence of linear programming problems. This paper reports theoretical and computational insights for efficiently finding good solutions for the above problem formulation, taking advantage of the solution structure and the search stage. The scores of the objective function on a set of test cases indicate better solutions than those previously reported in the literature. The empirical results based on multiple runs also suggest that the method generates final results that are not dependent on the quality of the initial solution; hence the solution search seems to be more global than many of the previous approaches.

[1]  Elwood S. Buffa,et al.  A Heuristic Algorithm and Simulation Approach to Relative Location of Facilities , 1963 .

[2]  R. Gomory,et al.  Multistage Cutting Stock Problems of Two and More Dimensions , 1965 .

[3]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[4]  M. Bazaraa Computerized Layout Design: A Branch and Bound Approach , 1975 .

[5]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Parameter estimation for distributions associated with the facilities design problem , 1976 .

[6]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Adaptive System Design: A Genetic Approach , 1980, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  L. R. Foulds,et al.  A graph-theoretic heuristic for minimizing total transport cost in facilities layout , 1985 .

[8]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Optimization of Control Parameters for Genetic Algorithms , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[10]  Gilbert Syswerda,et al.  Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms , 1989, ICGA.

[11]  H. D. Ratliff,et al.  Utilizing Cut Trees as Design Skeletons for Facility Layout , 1989 .

[12]  Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.  A heuristic algorithm for the quadratic assignment formulation to the plant layout problem , 1989 .

[13]  S. Broughton,et al.  Mean and standard deviation for the facilities design problem , 1990 .

[14]  K. Tam,et al.  A hierarchical approach to the facility layout problem , 1991 .

[15]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach , 1991 .

[16]  Benoit Montreuil,et al.  A Modelling Framework for Integrating Layout Design and flow Network Design , 1991 .

[17]  K. Y. Tam,et al.  A simulated annealing algorithm for allocating space to manufacturing cells , 1992 .

[18]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  A modelling of interactive facilities layout designer reasoning using qualitative patterns , 1992 .

[19]  D. Camp,et al.  A nonlinear optimization approach for solving facility layout problems , 1992 .

[20]  H. D. Ratliff,et al.  GENERATING A LAYOUT FROM A DESIGN SKELETON , 1993 .

[21]  André Langevin,et al.  Spine layout design , 1994 .

[22]  P. Banerjee,et al.  Facilities layout design optimization with single loop material flow path configuration , 1995 .

[23]  Alice E. Smith,et al.  Unequal-area facility layout by genetic search , 1995 .