Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment.

OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that aesthetic restorative dental treatment, using the porcelain laminate veneer, has a positive effect on the self-esteem of a patient. METHODS A study group of 17 patients, unhappy with their dental appearance, were assessed psychologically at the pre-operative, immediate post operative and 6 month review stages. Porcelain laminate veneer restorations were used to improve the dental aesthetics for the patients in the study group. A comparison group of 27 subjects, without a dental appearance problem, were also psychologically assessed at comparable intervals. The assessments included Cattell's 16PF Personality Inventory, a Body-Esteem index, a computer administered version of the Repertory Grid technique and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS The results showed that there were no significant differences between the study and comparison groups on any first or second-order factor of the 16PF. However, highly significant changes in a positive direction (p < 0.005) were observed in the study group in responses to a Body-Esteem questionnaire at each stage in the procedure. Comparison group changes were not significant. Repertory Grid analyses showed a significant overall convergence in the study group compared with the comparison group. There were also significant positive shifts amongst the study group in the normalised ratings of "self' on several of the constructs. Interviews confirmed the Repertory Grid findings. CONCLUSIONS The study shows that aesthetic restorative treatment has a positive effect on patients' self-esteem.

[1]  G. Kent,et al.  Psychological effects of permanently implanted false teeth: A 2-year follow-up and comparison with dentate patients , 1993 .

[2]  G. Kent Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: a literature review. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Personal change resulting from porcelain veneer treatment to improve the appearance of the teeth , 1996 .

[4]  G. Kent,et al.  Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: a comparison with replacement removable prostheses. , 1994, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Porcelain Laminate Veneers , 1988 .

[6]  M. Gabe,et al.  The Expectations of Orthodontic Patients in South Wales and St Louis, Missouri , 1979, British journal of orthodontics.

[7]  D. Lancaster,et al.  Dental implants: a survey of patients' attitudes. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  D. Bannister,et al.  Inquiring Man: the Theory of Personal Constructs , 1974 .

[9]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  Edentulousness--an oral handicap. Patient reactions to treatment with jawbone-anchored prostheses. , 1987, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  R. Goldstein Change Your Smile , 1984 .

[11]  P. Worthington,et al.  Psychological impact of osseointegrated dental implants. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  L. Lindquist,et al.  Psychological reactions to edentulousness and treatment with jawbone‐anchored bridges , 1983, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[13]  Nichola. Rumsey,et al.  The Social Psychology of Facial Appearance , 1998 .

[14]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  The effect of skin disease on self image , 1978, The British journal of dermatology.

[15]  J. Graham,et al.  The Psychology of cosmetic treatments , 1985 .

[16]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness. , 1982, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[17]  S. Karlsson,et al.  A clinical evaluation of ceramic laminate veneers. , 1992, The International journal of prosthodontics.