The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects

Abstract With this paper, I want to raise attention to the value of social conflict in energy policy and planning, and the limitations of participatory processes for including different normative appraisals in energy policy and planning. I first discuss three perspectives on the value of social conflict. Although invited participation is generally considered as a way to ameliorate, or anticipate social conflict on energy projects, this ‘participatory reflex’ goes past the fact that social conflict can itself be considered a form of participation, i.e. self-organized participation. Second, I discuss two basic characteristics of social conflict that show the limitations of invited participation in identifying and including divergent normative appraisals: 1) social conflict challenges institutions, and 2) social conflict involves emergent positions and groups. I propose to see social conflict as self-organized participation that serves as an source for identification and inclusion of normative appraisals in energy policy and planning. This not only necessitates the study of these phenomena as such, but also suggests a different approach to deal with such phenomena in research and practice. I will lay out three directions for further research.

[1]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Responsible Innovation in Energy Projects: Values in the Design of Technologies, Institutions and Stakeholder Interactions , 2015 .

[2]  M. Freedman,et al.  The Functions of Social Conflict , 1959 .

[3]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Using the Method of Context Validation to Mitigate Type III Errors in Environmental Policy Analysis , 2018 .

[4]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Process management , 2002 .

[5]  K. Boulding,et al.  The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. , 1956 .

[6]  L. Kriesberg.  Constructive Conflicts: From Escalation to Resolution , 1998 .

[7]  T. Coppens.  How to Turn a Planning Conflict into a Planning Success? Conditions for Constructive Conflict Management in the Case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp, Belgium , 2014 .

[8]  B. Wynne,et al.  Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs , 2001, Science as culture.

[9]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines , 2013 .

[10]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[11]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Participatory assessment: tools for empowering, learning and legitimating? , 2015 .

[12]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[13]  S. Niemeyer,et al.  Discursive Representation , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Dave Huitema,et al.  The nature of the beast: are citizens’ juries deliberative or pluralist? , 2007 .

[15]  M. Hajer.  Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[16]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[17]  M. Callon,et al.  The Growing Engagement of Emergent Concerned Groups in Political and Economic Life , 2008 .

[18]  J. Croft.  Conflict , 2007, The Evolution of Social Behaviour.

[19]  Wouter Van Dooren,et al.  Conflict reconsidered: The boomerang effect of depoliticization in the policy process , 2018 .

[20]  Kirsten E H Jenkins,et al.  Energy justice : a conceptual review , 2016 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  Institutions , 2010 .

[22]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands , 2015 .

[23]  E. Klijn,et al.  Managing Uncertainties in Networks a Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2004 .

[24]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Reconceptualizing Participation for Sustainable Rural Development: Towards a Negotiation Approach , 2000 .

[25]  van de Evert Vliert,et al.  Using Conflict in Organizations , 1997 .

[26]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Participation as Knowledge Production and the Limits of Democracy , 2005 .

[27]  Alfons Bora,et al.  Participatory science governance revisited: normative expectations versus empirical evidence , 2006 .

[28]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[29]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches , 2006 .

[30]  K. Tamvakis.  Symmetries , 2019, Undergraduate Texts in Physics.

[31]  N. Verloo.  Learning from informality? Rethinking the mismatch between formal policy strategies and informal tactics of citizenship , 2017 .

[32]  P Healey,et al.  Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning , 1998 .

[33]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .

[34]  R. Eyerman,et al.  Social Movements , 2019, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture.

[35]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[36]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity , 2011 .

[37]  Fons J. Verbeek,et al.  The Morality Machine: Tracking Moral Values in Tweets , 2016, IDA.

[38]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[39]  David Infield,et al.  Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: a framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects , 2010 .

[40]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects , 2017 .

[41]  C. Mouffe.  Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism , 2000 .

[42]  M. Leach,et al.  Mobilising citizens: social movement and the politics of knowledge. , 2007 .

[43]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Local perceptions of opportunities for engagement and procedural justice in electricity transmission grid projects in Norway and the UK , 2015 .

[44]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[45]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[46]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[47]  Michel Callon,et al.  An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology , 1998 .

[48]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  DISCURSIVE METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION MAKING , 1997 .

[50]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[51]  Arie Rip,et al.  Controversies as Informal Technology A ssessment , 1986 .

[52]  Verne C. Fryklund,et al.  What systems analysis? , 1981, Nature.

[53]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[54]  Sabine Roeser,et al.  An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk , 2016 .

[55]  E. F. ten Heuvelhof.  Strategic behaviour in network industries : a multidisciplinary approach , 2009 .

[56]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[57]  A. Oberschall.  Theories of Social Conflict , 1978 .

[58]  C. Eden.  BookOn systems analysis : David Berlinski 186 pages, £ 10.25 (Cambridge, Mass, and London, MIT Press, 1976)☆ , 1978 .

[59]  Gill Seyfang,et al.  Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions , 2012 .

[60]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[61]  J. Bryson.  What to do when Stakeholders matter , 2004 .