A proactive and resilient seismic risk mitigation strategy for existing school buildings

Abstract Different methods and procedures have been developed to define prioritisation strategies of retrofit interventions aimed at reducing the seismic risk of school buildings on a large territorial scale. However, these approaches fail to demonstrate how risk analysis has been used successfully to quantitatively assess and select the optimal risk management decision. This article proposes innovative and useful metrics to measure the potential costs and benefits related to the prioritisation of retrofit intervention and the resilience of the analysed school system by directly integrating engineering, organisational, socio-economic and political aspects in the realm of seismic resilience assessment. Based on probabilistic risk assessments considering the new vulnerability of the prioritised school buildings, these measures could predict the expected economic and functional losses associated with a disastrous seismic event, as well as the possible post-disaster recovery of the system. In order to help decision-makers in selecting the optimal mitigation strategy with a multidisciplinary and multidimensional perspective, different political scenarios, the relative prioritisations of interventions and their intervention options are also defined. The proposed framework is demonstrated in a complex case study of 1,825 public schools in the Lima metropolitan area, Peru. Policymakers, planners and engineering professionals could benefit from results.

[1]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Prioritization strategies to reduce the seismic risk of the public and strategic buildings , 2017 .

[2]  I. Towhata Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2008 .

[3]  Hsiao-Fan Wang,et al.  Web-Based Green Products Life Cycle Management Systems: Reverse Supply Chain Utilization , 2008 .

[4]  Daniel QUIUN,et al.  REPAIR AND SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN PERU , 2002 .

[5]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities , 2003 .

[6]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management , 2014 .

[7]  Antonio Formisano,et al.  Optimal seismic upgrading of a reinforced concrete school building with metal-based devices using an efficient multi-criteria decision-making method , 2017 .

[8]  G. Cimellaro,et al.  PEOPLES: A Framework for Evaluating Resilience , 2016 .

[9]  R. Rincón,et al.  SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND PRIORITIZATION STRATEGY FOR RISK MITIGATION , 2016 .

[10]  Sandra Santa-Cruz,et al.  Social sustainability dimensions in the seismic risk reduction of public schools: a case study of Lima, Peru , 2016 .

[11]  Luca Martinelli,et al.  Earthquake-Resilience-Based Control Solutions for the Extended Benchmark Cable-Stayed Bridge , 2016 .

[12]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring Improvements in the Disaster Resilience of Communities , 2004 .

[13]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[14]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Seismic resilience of a hospital system , 2010 .

[15]  Sandra Santa-Cruz,et al.  Seismic Evaluation of Incremental Seismic Retrofitting Techniques for Typical Peruvian Schools , 2017 .

[16]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Performance of School Buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake , 2004 .

[17]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy , 2007 .

[18]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Thinking about resilient cities: studying Italian earthquakes , 2016 .

[19]  Marco Vona,et al.  Spatial Analysis and Ranking for Retrofitting of the School Network in Lima, Peru , 2017, ICCSA.

[20]  M. Zoback,et al.  Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative , 2013 .

[21]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[22]  Marco Vona,et al.  MCDM METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS , 2016 .

[23]  Sassan Eshghi,et al.  Performance of Essential Buildings in the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake , 2005 .

[24]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[25]  J. Palomino,et al.  Registration Code: S-P1461191479 PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY FOR SEISMIC RISK REDUCTION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. STUDY CASE: LIMA, PERU , 2016 .

[26]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[27]  Disaster Resilience DISASTER RESILIENCE: , 2019, Futureproof.

[28]  Ayhan Irfanoglu,et al.  Performance of Template School Buildings during Earthquakes in Turkey and Peru , 2009 .

[29]  Lindsey R. Barnes,et al.  A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters , 2008 .

[30]  Enrico Quagliarini,et al.  Post-World War II Italian school buildings: typical and specific seismic vulnerabilities , 2015 .

[31]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience , 2010 .

[32]  Sandra MIRANDA,et al.  SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN TOLUCA CITY , 1999 .

[33]  Marco Vona,et al.  New resilience model of communities based on numerical evaluation and observed post seismic reconstruction process , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[34]  C. Chethika Abenayake,et al.  A Study on Community's Perception on Disaster Resilience Concept , 2014 .