Vehicular network self-organizing architectures

Nowadays, Vehicle Communication (VC) represents an interesting item for research and industry communities since it brings an efficient way to improve the transport quality. Nevertheless, VC faces a number of new challenges, in particular due to the extremely dynamic network topology and the large variable number of mobile nodes. To overcome these problems an effective solution is to define a self-healing and robust self-organizing architecture that facilitates the network management task and permits to deploy a wide panoply of services. Depending on the application deployed on the top of the vehicular network, it may require either a proactive or a reactive self-organization architecture. In this paper, we introduce CSP and CGP, which are respectively proactive and reactive cluster-based self-organizing protocols. The two solutions are cross layer and they structure intelligently the vehicular network in permanent manner by portioning roads into adjacent segments seen as geographic fix clusters. When the proactive solution, CSP, can be used for security issues or to provide a large panoply of services, the reactive solution, CGP, is mainly used to perform data collection and aggregation. In our work, we analyze the performances of both CSP and CGP using a simulation environment and realistic mobility models. We compare them to existing solutions and show that they permit performance improvement.

[1]  Paolo Bellavista,et al.  Efficient data harvesting in mobile sensor platforms , 2006, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOMW'06).

[2]  Maziar Nekovee,et al.  Sensor networks on the road: the promises and challenges of vehicular ad hoc networks and grids , 2005 .

[3]  Luciano Bononi,et al.  A Cross Layered MAC and Clustering Scheme for Efficient Broadcast in VANETs , 2007, 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[4]  K. Mnif,et al.  Construction and Maintenance of Backbone for Routing Protocols Enhancement in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE Singapore International Conference on Communication Systems.

[5]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  VanetMobiSim: generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs , 2006, VANET '06.

[6]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  Virtual backbone generation and maintenance in ad hoc network mobility management , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[7]  Nahid Shahmehri,et al.  A peer-to-peer approach to vehicular communication for the support of traffic safety applications , 2002, Proceedings. The IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[8]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  Span: An Energy-Efficient Coordination Algorithm for Topology Maintenance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2002, Wirel. Networks.

[9]  Yanjing Sun,et al.  Constructing Distributed Connected Dominating Sets in Growth-Bounded Graphs , 2008, 2008 4th IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems for Communications.

[10]  T. Ueda,et al.  Network connectivity of layered self-organizing wireless networks , 1997, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[11]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Challenges of intervehicle ad hoc networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  A. S. Korotkov 1 st IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems for Communications , 2002 .