Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millennium.

[1]  B. Bremer,et al.  More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny--case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). , 1999, Systematic biology.

[2]  James M. Carpenter,et al.  The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[3]  D. Hillis,et al.  Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[4]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Molecular Systematics and Evolution: Theory and Practice , 2002, EXS 92.

[5]  K. Klass.  Morphological evidence on blattarian phylogeny: “phylogenetic histories and stories” (Insecta, Dictyoptera) , 2001 .

[6]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Techniques in Molecular Systematics and Evolution , 2002, Methods and Tools in Biosciences and Medicine.

[7]  N. Wahlberg,et al.  Morphology versus molecules: resolution of the positions of Nymphalis, Polygonia, and related genera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) , 2003 .

[8]  J. S. Rogers,et al.  Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[9]  A. Vogler,et al.  Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the Carabid beetles Ohomopterus. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[10]  W. Maddison.  Gene Trees in Species Trees , 1997 .

[11]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[12]  M. Coates,et al.  Early tetrapod relationships revisited , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  J. J. Morrone,et al.  Biodiversidad, Taxonomía y Biogeografía de Artrópodos de México: Hacia una Síntesis de su Conocimiento. Volumen II , 2000 .

[14]  D. Norris,et al.  Systematics and Biogeography of Hard Ticks, a Total Evidence Approach , 2000, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[15]  R. Jenner.  Bilaterian phylogeny and uncritical recycling of morphological data sets. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[16]  Xuhua Xia,et al.  18S ribosomal RNA and tetrapod phylogeny. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[17]  W. Wheeler,et al.  On bivalve phylogeny: a high‐level analysis of the Bivalvia (Mollusca) based on combined morphology and DNA sequence data , 2005 .

[18]  N. Platnick,et al.  Advances in Cladistics, Volume 2 , 1984 .

[19]  Longlong Yang,et al.  Phylogenetic revision of Agapophytinae subf.n. (Diptera: Therevidae) based on molecular and morphological evidence , 2001 .

[20]  D. Littlewood,et al.  The interrelationships of all major groups of Platyhelminthes: phylogenetic evidence from morphology and molecules , 1999 .

[21]  R. Meier,et al.  A cladistic analysis of Diopsidae (Diptera) based on morphological and DNA sequence data , 2002 .

[22]  Derrick J. Zwickl,et al.  Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? , 2003, Systematic biology.

[23]  K. Kjer,et al.  Multiple data sets, congruence, and hypothesis testing for the phylogeny of basal groups of the lizard genus Sceloporus (Squamata, Phrynosomatidae). , 2000, Systematic biology.

[24]  H. Philippe,et al.  Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[25]  A. Friday,et al.  Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction , 1984 .

[26]  T. Givnish,et al.  Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[27]  Rob DeSalle,et al.  Combined support for wholesale taxic atavism in gavialine crocodylians. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[28]  M. Steel,et al.  How molecules evolve in eubacteria. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  M. Miyamoto,et al.  Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  D. Littlewood,et al.  Phylogeny and evolution of developmental mode in temnopleurid echinoids. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[31]  Mark P. Simmons,et al.  Amino acid vs. nucleotide characters: challenging preconceived notions. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[32]  B. Crother,et al.  Palm‐Pitviper (Bothriechis) Phylogeny, mtDNA, and Consilience , 2001 .

[33]  F. Sperling,et al.  Phylogeny of the water strider genus Gerris Fabricius (Heteroptera: Gerridae) based on COI mtDNA, EF‐1α nuclear DNA and morphology , 2001 .

[34]  D. A. Mclennan,et al.  Phylogeny and Speciation of Felids , 2000, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[35]  M. Siddall,et al.  Probabilism and Phylogenetic Inference , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[36]  P. Hofstaetter.  [Similarity]. , 2020, Psyche.

[37]  M. Källersjö,et al.  Seed Plant Relationships and the Systematic Position of Gnetales Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA: Conflicting Data, Rooting Problems, and the Monophyly of Conifers , 2002, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[38]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Arthropod Cladistics: Combined Analysis of Histone H3 and U2 snRNA Sequences and Morphology , 2000 .

[39]  C. Schander,et al.  Useful characters in gastropod phylogeny: soft information or hard facts? , 2001, Systematic biology.

[40]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Current advances in the phylogenetic reconstruction of metazoan evolution. A new paradigm for the Cambrian explosion? , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[41]  G. Budd.  A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem , 2002, Nature.

[42]  S. Barker,et al.  A total-evidence phylogeny of ticks provides insights into the evolution of life cycles and biogeography. , 2001, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[43]  A. Kluge,et al.  Testability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypotheses , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[44]  I. Kornfield,et al.  Molecular systematics of the Acoela (Acoelomorpha, Platyhelminthes) and its concordance with morphology. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[45]  W. Wheeler,et al.  Phylogeny of Henicopidae (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha): a combined analysis of morphology and five molecular loci , 2002 .

[46]  Michael S. Y. Lee.  Historical Burden In Systematics And The Interrelationships Of ‘Parareptiles’ , 1995 .

[47]  C. A. Machado,et al.  The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  P. Arctander,et al.  Hidden morphological support for the phylogenetic placement of Pseudoryx nghetinhensis with bovine bovids: a combined analysis of gross anatomical evidence and DNA sequences from five genes. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[49]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Phylogeny reconstruction: the role of morphology. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[50]  E. Strong.  Refining molluscan characters: morphology, character coding and a phylogeny of the Caenogastropoda , 2003 .

[51]  R. Jenner,et al.  The grand game of metazoan phylogeny: rules and strategies , 1999 .

[52]  M. Wills,et al.  An arthropod phylogeny based on fossil and recent taxa , 1998 .

[53]  B. Holland,et al.  Searching factors causing implausible non-monophyly: ssu rDNA phylogeny of Isopoda Asellota (Crustacea: Peracarida) and faster evolution in marine than in freshwater habitats. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[54]  W. Kress,et al.  Unraveling the evolutionary radiation of the families of the Zingiberales using morphological and molecular evidence. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[55]  M. Steel.  Some statistical aspects of the maximum parsimony method. , 2002, EXS.

[56]  K. Peterson,et al.  Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences , 2001, Evolution & development.

[57]  R. Jenner.  Towards a phylogeny of the Metazoa: evaluating alternative phylogenetic positions of Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and Gnathostomulida, with a critical reappraisal of cladistic characters , 2004 .

[58]  J. Hawkins,et al.  Primary Homology Assessment, Characters and Character States , 1997, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[59]  K. Shaw.  Conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of a recent species radiation: What mtDNA reveals and conceals about modes of speciation in Hawaiian crickets , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  D. Swofford,et al.  Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? , 2001, Systematic biology.

[61]  M. Simmons,et al.  Conflict between Amino Acid and Nucleotide Characters , 2002 .

[62]  Alwyn Williams,et al.  A Stem Group Brachiopod From The Lower Cambrian: Support For A Micrina (Halkieriid) Ancestry , 2002 .

[63]  J. Geisler,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of different methods of coding taxonomic polymorphism: an example from higher‐level bat phylogeny , 2002 .

[64]  A. Kluge.  Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics , 1997 .

[65]  John Gatesy,et al.  Is morphology still relevant? , 2002, EXS.

[66]  R. Jenner.  The scientific status of metazoan cladistics: why current research practice must change , 2004 .

[67]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). , 2001, Systematic biology.

[68]  M. Siddall,et al.  Success of Parsimony in the Four‐Taxon Case: Long‐Branch Repulsion by Likelihood in the Farris Zone , 1998 .

[69]  D. Janies.  Phylogenetic relationships of extant echinoderm classes , 2001 .

[70]  P. Lewis.  A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. , 2001, Systematic biology.

[71]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny , 1999 .

[72]  Michael S. Y. Lee,et al.  Snake phylogeny based on osteology, soft anatomy and ecology , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[73]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  Modernizing the Tree of Life , 2003, Science.

[74]  C. Simon,et al.  The performance of several multiple-sequence alignment programs in relation to secondary-structure features for an rRNA sequence. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[75]  U. Sorhannus.  A “Total Evidence” Analysis of the Phylogenetic Relationships among the Photosynthetic Stramenopiles , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[76]  S. Hedges,et al.  Higher-level relationships of snakes inferred from four nuclear and mitochondrial genes. , 2002, Comptes rendus biologies.

[77]  D. Hillis.  Approaches for Assessing Phylogenetic Accuracy , 1995 .

[78]  J. Farris.  The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis , 2004 .

[79]  Gonzalo Giribet,et al.  Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology , 2001, Nature.

[80]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. , 1994, Science.

[81]  H. Philippe,et al.  Ancient phylogenetic relationships. , 2002, Theoretical population biology.

[82]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  6 MYRIAPOD PHYLOGENY AND THE RELATIONSHIPS OF CHILOPODA , 2002 .

[83]  R. Collin.  The utility of morphological characters in gastropod phylogenetics: an example from the Calyptraeidae , 2003 .

[84]  M. Siddall.  Measures of Support , 2002 .

[85]  P. Holland,et al.  Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[86]  A. Kluge.  Distinguishing “or” from “and” and the case for historical identification , 2002 .

[87]  M. Sørensen.  On the evolution and morphology of the rotiferan trophi, with a cladistic analysis of Rotifera , 2002 .

[88]  R. Jenner.  Boolean logic and character state indentity: pitfalls of character coding in metazoan cladistics , 2002 .

[89]  K. Kjer,et al.  Use of rRNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: an example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[90]  J. Wiens,et al.  Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[91]  D. Hillis,et al.  When are phylogenetic analyses misled by convergence? A case study in Texas cave salamanders. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[92]  P. O'Grady,et al.  Phylogeny of Drosophilinae (Diptera: Drosophilidae), with comments on combined analysis and character support. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[93]  Susanne Schulmeister.  Simultaneous analysis of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta): introducing robust-choice sensitivity analysis , 2003 .

[94]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  Objections to Bootstrapping Phylogenies: A Critique , 1995 .

[95]  S. Jensen,et al.  A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[96]  W. Brown,et al.  Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. , 1998, Systematic biology.

[97]  Jon Mallatt,et al.  Fossil sister group of craniates: Predicted and found , 2003, Journal of morphology.

[98]  D. Tautz,et al.  A plea for DNA taxonomy , 2003 .

[99]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[100]  J. Huelsenbeck,et al.  Hobgoblin of phylogenetics? , 1994, Nature.

[101]  T. Stach,et al.  Phylogeny of Tunicata inferred from molecular and morphological characters. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[102]  J. Farris.  Likelihood and Inconsistency , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[103]  G. Edgecombe,et al.  Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution , 1998 .

[104]  Michael S. Y. Lee.  Unalignable sequences and molecular evolution , 2001 .

[105]  J. Wiens,et al.  War of the Iguanas: conflicting molecular and morphological phylogenies and long-branch attraction in iguanid lizards. , 2000, Systematic biology.

[106]  S. Carroll,et al.  Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies , 2003, Nature.

[107]  D. Hillis.  Inferring complex phytogenies , 1996, Nature.