Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US.

PURPOSE To determine the accuracy of a previously developed automated algorithm (AUTOPLAQ [APQ]) for rapid volumetric quantification of noncalcified and calcified plaque from coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography in comparison with intravascular ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant; all patients provided written informed consent. APQ combines derived scan-specific attenuation threshold levels for lumen, plaque, and knowledge-based segmentation of coronary arteries for quantification of plaque components. APQ was validated with retrospective analysis of 22 coronary atherosclerotic plaques in 20 patients imaged with coronary CT angiography and intravascular US within 2 days of each other. Coronary CT angiographic data were acquired by using dual-source CT. For each patient, well-defined plaques without calcifications were selected, and plaque volume was measured with APQ and manual tracing at CT and with intravascular US. Measurements were compared with paired t test, correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS There was excellent correlation between noncalcified plaque volumes quantified with APQ and intravascular US (r = 0.94, P < .001), with no significant differences (P = .08). Mean plaque volume with intravascular US was 105.9 mm³ ± 83.5 (standard deviation) and with APQ was 116.6 mm³ ± 80.1. Mean plaque volume with manual tracing from CT was 100.8 mm³ ± 81.7 and with APQ was 116.6 mm³ ± 80.1, with excellent correlation (r = 0.92, P < .001) and no significant differences (P = .23). CONCLUSION Automated scan-specific threshold level-based quantification of plaque components from coronary CT angiography allows rapid, accurate measurement of noncalcified plaque volumes, compared with intravascular US, and requires a fraction of the time needed for manual analysis.

[1]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Assessment of changes in non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque volume in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries over time by 64-slice computed tomography. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Y. Arad,et al.  Objectives Background Methods Results Conclusions , 2022 .

[3]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Assessment of nonstenotic coronary lesions by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in comparison to intravascular ultrasound: evaluation of nonculprit coronary lesions. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[6]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography , 2005, European Radiology.

[9]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  T. Callister,et al.  Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. , 1998, Radiology.

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantification of Coronary Plaque by 64-slice Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Quantitative Intracoronary Ultrasound , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[13]  D. Dey,et al.  Reproducibility of coronary artery plaque volume and composition quantification by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: an intraobserver, interobserver, and interscan variability study. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[14]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Interobserver Variability of 64-Slice Computed Tomography for the Quantification of Non-Calcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2007, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[15]  Chun-Shan Yam,et al.  Measuring noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque using voxel analysis with MDCT angiography: a pilot clinical study. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  How do you quantify noncalcified plaque? , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[17]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment. , 2007, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[18]  Faisal Khosa,et al.  Coronary plaque quantification by voxel analysis: dual-source MDCT angiography versus intravascular sonography. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  S. Abbara,et al.  Cardiac CT: State of the art for the detection of coronary arterial stenosis , 2008 .

[21]  Dieter Ropers,et al.  Quantification of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaques with dual-source computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound , 2009, Heart.

[22]  Richard D. White,et al.  Contrast enhancement of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: a high-resolution, multidetector-row computed tomography study of pressure-perfused, human ex-vivo coronary arteries , 2006, Coronary artery disease.

[23]  C D Claussen,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT in the characterisation of non-calcified plaque: use of a colour-coded analysis compared with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  S. Blair,et al.  Coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in a large cohort of asymptomatic men and women. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  Stephen Schroeder,et al.  Influence of a Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Plaques Monitored by Multislice Detector Computed Tomography: Results of the New Age II Pilot Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[26]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  Moyses Szklo,et al.  Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.