Exhuming Q: Market Power vs. Capital Market Imperfections

Evidence of the statistical significance of profits in Q regressions remains one of the principal findings in the empirical investment literature. This result is frequently taken to support the view that capital market imperfections are an important element for understanding investment. This paper challenges that conclusion. We argue that allowing the profit function at the firm level to be strictly concave, reflecting, for example, market power, is sucent to replicate the Q theory based regression results in which profits are a significant factor determining investment. To be clear, our ability to replicate the existing results does not require the specification of any capital market imperfections. Thus the friction that explains the statistical significance of profits could be market power by sellers rather than capital market imperfections.

[1]  Russell Cooper,et al.  Machine Replacement and the Business Cycle: Lumps and Bumps , 1995 .

[2]  Christian Gourieroux,et al.  Simulation-based econometric methods , 1996 .

[3]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  Aggregate Investment , 1997 .

[4]  Janice C. Eberly,et al.  A Unified Model of Investment Under Uncertainty , 1993 .

[5]  Jerome Adda,et al.  Balladurette and Juppette: A Discrete Analysis of Scrapping Subsidies , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[7]  Andrew B. Abel,et al.  The Present Value of Profits and Cyclical Movements in Investment , 1983 .

[8]  Jonathan L. Willis.  Estimation of Adjustment Costs in a Model of State-Dependent Pricing , 2000 .

[9]  Ricardo J. Caballero,et al.  Fixed Costs: The Demise of Marginal Q , 1996 .

[10]  David B. Gross.  The investment and financing decisions of liquidity constrained firms , 1995 .

[11]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  TOBIN'S MARGINAL q AND AVERAGE q: A NEOCLASSICAL INTERPRETATION , 1982 .

[12]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment , 1987 .

[13]  Toni M. Whited,et al.  Internal Finance and Firm Investment , 1993 .

[14]  Fumio Hayashi,et al.  The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms , 1990 .

[15]  Costas Meghir,et al.  Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy , 1994 .

[16]  George Tauchen,et al.  Finite state markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions , 1986 .

[17]  Russell Cooper,et al.  On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs , 2000 .

[18]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Plant-Level Adjustment and Aggregate Investment Dynamics , 1995 .

[19]  S. Barnett,et al.  A New Look at Firm Market Value, Investment, and Adjustment Costs , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[20]  Toni M. Whited.  Debt, liquidity constraints, and corporate investment: evidence from panel data , 1992 .

[21]  F. Schiantarelli,et al.  Generalized Q Models for Investment , 1991 .

[22]  Joao F. Gomes,et al.  Financing Investment , 2001 .

[23]  Timothy Erickson,et al.  Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and q , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Charles P. Himmelberg,et al.  Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment , 1995 .

[25]  Janice C. Eberly,et al.  Investment and q with Fixed Costs: An Empirical Analysis , 2001 .