The Development From Adaptive to Cognitive Radar Resource Management

Cognitive radar can be defined as [1]: A radar system that acquires information, knowledge, and understanding about its operating environment through online estimation, reasoning and learning, or from datasets comprising context. A cognitive radar then exploits the acquired information, knowledge, and understanding to enhance information extraction, data processing, and radar management. Implicit in this definition is the implementation of perception-action cycles that are predominantly recognized as a defining feature of cognitive radar. As is evident from the variety of living species, the extent to which information, knowledge, and understanding is acquired and exploited can vary greatly. Consequently, a single feature qualifying a radar as cognitive does not exist. Instead cognition can be visualized as a continuous spectrum with varying degrees of cognitive capability [2]. A cognitive radar ultimately finds that the information present in a single radar dwell is insufficient to effectively control the available degrees of freedom. Therefore, a cognitive radar attempts to preserve information, knowledge, and understanding exploited from any available source, be it processed radar data acquired over extended time periods, context, or learning. Multifunction radar (MFR) is a particularly attractive recipient for cognitive radar techniques. An MFR, ideally enabled by arbitrary waveform generation and electronic beam steering, is capable of executing many tasks that support differing radar functions. Radar resource management is a vital enabling technology for an MFR, as it enables an effective control of the transmitter degrees of freedom, thus unlocking the full potential of the system. Management becomes evenmore crucial for the current trend of multifunction RF systems, as the additional functions place additional demands on the shared resources. Since radar resource management techniques have implemented perception-action cycles for many decades, it is a topic that is very closely related to cognitive radar. In the “Cognitive Radar Architecture” section, a cognitive radar architecture is presented, within which cognitive radar techniques can be realized. Then, in the “Development of Adaptivity in Radar Resource Management” and “Drive to Cognitive Radar Resource Management” sections, an overview of adaptive and cognitive radar resource management techniques is presented. As this series of techniques represents increasing adaptation to information or knowledge, the reader is taken on a walk along the cognitive spectrum in the context of radar resource management. The “Challenges and Drawbacks” section discusses drawbacks and challenges that should be considered in the cognitive radar research and development process.

[1]  James Llinas,et al.  Revisiting the JDL Data Fusion Model II , 2004 .

[2]  Alexander Charlish,et al.  Array radar resource management , 2017 .

[3]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Optimal waveform selection for tracking systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[4]  Alexander Charlish,et al.  A resource allocation model for the radar search function , 2014, 2014 International Radar Conference.

[5]  R.J. Evans,et al.  Waveform selective probabilistic data association , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Fotios Katsilieris,et al.  Sensor management for surveillance and tracking: An operational perspective , 2015 .

[7]  M. Ulmke,et al.  Road-map assisted ground moving target tracking , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[8]  Hans Driessen,et al.  Optimal search: A practical interpretation of information-driven sensor management , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[9]  S. Howard,et al.  Waveform Libraries , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  W. van Rossum,et al.  A cognitive radar network: Architecture and application to multiplatform radar management , 2008, 2008 European Radar Conference.

[11]  Hugh Griffiths,et al.  Proposed ontology for cognitive radar systems , 2018, IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation.

[12]  Augusto Aubry,et al.  Radar waveform design in a spectrally crowded environment via nonconvex quadratic optimization , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[13]  John P. Lehoczky,et al.  Resource management of highly configurable tasks , 2004, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings..

[14]  F. Barbaresco,et al.  Intelligent M3R Radar Time Resources management: Advanced cognition, agility & autonomy capabilities , 2009, 2009 International Radar Conference "Surveillance for a Safer World" (RADAR 2009).

[15]  D. J. Barrett,et al.  Model-Data Fusion , 2003 .

[16]  Marshall Greenspan Potential pitfalls of cognitive radars , 2014, 2014 IEEE Radar Conference.

[17]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Cognitive Radar Framework for Target Detection and Tracking , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[18]  G. A. Watson,et al.  IMMPDAF for radar management and tracking benchmark with ECM , 1998 .

[19]  Simon Haykin,et al.  The Impact of Cognition on Radar Technology , 2017 .

[20]  Joan Bruna,et al.  Intriguing properties of neural networks , 2013, ICLR.

[21]  Wojciech Samek,et al.  Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks , 2017, Digit. Signal Process..

[22]  William Dale Blair,et al.  Benchmark problem for beam pointing control of phased array radar against maneuvering targets , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[23]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive Dynamic Systems: Perception-action Cycle, Radar and Radio , 2012 .

[24]  J. R. Guerci,et al.  Cognitive radar: A knowledge-aided fully adaptive approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE Radar Conference.

[25]  S. Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radar: a way of the future , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[26]  Anna Freud,et al.  Design And Analysis Of Modern Tracking Systems , 2016 .

[27]  Steffen Jung,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Filtering with Long Short-Term Memory Prediction , 2019, 2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).

[28]  G. V. Keuk,et al.  On phased-array radar tracking and parameter control , 1993 .

[29]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Control theoretic approach to tracking radar: First step towards cognition , 2011, Digit. Signal Process..

[30]  A. Papandreou-Suppappola,et al.  Waveform-agile sensing for tracking , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[31]  Wolfgang Koch Adaptive parameter control for phased-array tracking , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[32]  Alexander Charlish,et al.  Cognitive radar management , 2017 .

[33]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Benchmark for radar allocation and tracking in ECM , 1998 .

[34]  W.K. Stafford MESAR, Sampson & Radar Technology for BMD , 2007, 2007 IEEE Radar Conference.

[35]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples , 2014, ICLR.

[36]  M.A. Neifeld,et al.  Adaptive Waveform Design and Sequential Hypothesis Testing for Target Recognition With Active Sensors , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.