Utilizing High-Density Electroencephalography and Motion Capture Technology to Characterize Sensorimotor Integration While Performing Complex Actions

Studies of sensorimotor integration often use sensory stimuli that require a simple motor response, such as a reach or a grasp. Recent advances in neural recording techniques, motion capture technologies, and time-synchronization methods enable studying sensorimotor integration using more complex sensory stimuli and performed actions. Here, we demonstrate that prehensile actions that require using complex sensory instructions for manipulating different objects can be characterized using high-density electroencephalography and motion capture systems. In 20 participants, we presented stimuli in different sensory modalities (visual, auditory) containing different contextual information about the object with which to interact. Neural signals recorded near motor cortex and posterior parietal cortex discharged based on both the instruction delivered and object manipulated. Additionally, kinematics of the wrist movements could be discriminated between participants. These findings demonstrate a proof-of-concept behavioral paradigm for studying sensorimotor integration of multidimensional sensory stimuli to perform complex movements. The designed framework will prove vital for studying neural control of movements in clinical populations in which sensorimotor integration is impaired due to information no longer being communicated correctly between brain regions (e.g. stroke). Such a framework is the first step towards developing a neural rehabilitative system for restoring function more effectively.

[1]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Recalibration of inhibitory control systems during walking-related dual-task interference: A Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MOBI) Study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  Joshua B. Ewen,et al.  Dynamics of functional and effective connectivity within human cortical motor control networks , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI): High-density electrical mapping of inhibitory processes during walking , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Adam G Rouse,et al.  Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-to-grasp kinematics. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Human EEG reveals distinct neural correlates of power and precision grasping types , 2018, NeuroImage.

[7]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Update on apraxia , 2008, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[8]  M. Desmurget,et al.  Movement Intention After Parietal Cortex Stimulation in Humans , 2009, Science.

[9]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[10]  S. Katz,et al.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. , 1963, JAMA.

[11]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[12]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The aging brain shows less flexible reallocation of cognitive resources during dual-task walking: A mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) study , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  Christopher A. Buneo,et al.  Neural correlates of learning and trajectory planning in the posterior parietal cortex , 2013, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[14]  C. Honey,et al.  Mapping human brain networks with cortico-cortical evoked potentials , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Cortical Motor System , 2001, Neuron.

[16]  Naznin Virji-Babul,et al.  Spatial‐temporal dynamics of cortical activity underlying reaching and grasping , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[17]  E. Cassetta,et al.  Sensorimotor integration in focal task-specific hand dystonia: A magnetoencephalographic assessment , 2008, Neuroscience.

[18]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[19]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[20]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[21]  Scott T. Grafton The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Jenni M. Karl,et al.  Different Evolutionary Origins for the Reach and the Grasp: An Explanation for Dual Visuomotor Channels in Primate Parietofrontal Cortex , 2013, Front. Neurol..

[23]  N. Hatsopoulos,et al.  Encoding of Coordinated Reach and Grasp Trajectories in Primary Motor Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  R. Andersen,et al.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex , 1997, Nature.

[25]  Adam G Rouse,et al.  Spatiotemporal Distribution of Location and Object Effects in Primary Motor Cortex Neurons during Reach-to-Grasp , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[27]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention, Action Planning, and Decision Making in Parietal-Frontal Circuits , 2009, Neuron.

[28]  Kyuwan Choi,et al.  Intentional signal in prefrontal cortex generalizes across different sensory modalities. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Yale E. Cohen,et al.  A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Re-thinking the role of motor cortex: Context-sensitive motor outputs? , 2014, NeuroImage.

[31]  David Zipser,et al.  Simultaneous control of hand displacements and rotations in orientation-matching experiments. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  R. Knight,et al.  Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Ciprian M Crainiceanu,et al.  Dynamics of event‐related causality in brain electrical activity , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Dirk Koester,et al.  Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[36]  I. Toni,et al.  Integration of target and effector information in the human brain during reach planning. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  L. Jakobson,et al.  Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[43]  M. Jeannerod The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Klaus Gramann,et al.  Mobile Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI) of Physical Interaction with Dynamically Moving Objects , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[45]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Long-term test-retest reliability of event-related potential (ERP) recordings during treadmill walking using the mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) approach , 2017, Brain Research.

[46]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Decoding 3-D Reach and Grasp Kinematics From High-Frequency Local Field Potentials in Primate Primary Motor Cortex , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Linking brain, mind and behavior. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[48]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Decoding Complete Reach and Grasp Actions from Local Primary Motor Cortex Populations , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Kelvin S. Oie,et al.  Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans , 2011, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[50]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  Dynamics of large-scale cortical interactions at high gamma frequencies during word production: Event related causality (ERC) analysis of human electrocorticography (ECoG) , 2011, NeuroImage.

[51]  M. Goodale Transforming vision into action , 2011, Vision Research.

[52]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website , 2019, NeuroImage.