Observational fragility functions for residential stone masonry buildings in Nepal

This paper outlines the seismic vulnerability of rural stone masonry buildings affected by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake sequence. Summary of field observation is presented first and empirical fragility curves are developed from the detailed damage assessment data from 603 villages in central, eastern and western Nepal. Fragility curves are developed on the basis of 665,515 building damage cases collected during the post-earthquake detailed damage assessment campaign conducted by Government of Nepal. Two sets of fragility functions are derived using peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at 0.3 s as the intensity measures. The sum of the results highlights that stone masonry buildings in Nepal are highly vulnerable even in the case of low to moderate ground shaking. The results further indicate that in the case of strong to major earthquakes, most of the stone masonry buildings in Nepal would sustain severe damage or collapse.

[1]  A. Martinelli,et al.  Building vulnerability assessment and damage scenarios in Celano (Italy) using a quick survey data-based methodology , 2008 .

[2]  Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.  Fundamentals of earthquake engineering , 1971 .

[3]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data , 2008 .

[4]  Keith Porter,et al.  An Overview of PEER's Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology , 2003 .

[5]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  A Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering of Bridge-Abutment Systems , 2012 .

[6]  R. Rupakhety,et al.  The 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha Earthquake in Nepal and its aftershocks: analysis of strong ground motion , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[8]  Bjarni Bessason,et al.  Seismic vulnerability of low-rise residential buildings based on damage data from three earthquakes (Mw6.5, 6.5 and 6.3) , 2016 .

[9]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Van Nuys Hotel Building Testbed Report: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment , 2005 .

[10]  D. Gautam On seismic vulnerability of highway bridges in Nepal: 1988 Udaypur earthquake (MW 6.8) revisited , 2017 .

[11]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structural Components and Systems , 2006 .

[12]  Robert E. Bachman,et al.  Creating Fragility Functions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2007 .

[13]  Paolo Ricci,et al.  Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[14]  T. Y. Yang Assessing seismic risks for new and existing buildings using performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology , 2013 .

[15]  Maria Rota,et al.  Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves , 2008 .

[16]  Hugo Rodrigues,et al.  Common structural and construction deficiencies of Nepalese buildings , 2016, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions.

[17]  T. Rossettoa,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[18]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment , 2005 .

[19]  D. Gautam,et al.  Structural performance and associated lessons to be learned from world earthquakes in Nepal after 25 April 2015 (MW 7.8) Gorkha earthquake , 2016 .

[20]  F. Magistris,et al.  Soil liquefaction in Kathmandu valley due to 25 April 2015 Gorkha, Nepal earthquake , 2017 .

[21]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems , 2013 .