Accounting for the effects of accountability.

This article reviews the now extensive research literature addressing the impact of accountability on a wide range of social judgments and choices. It focuses on 4 issues: (a) What impact do various accountability ground rules have on thoughts, feelings, and action? (b) Under what conditions will accountability attenuate, have no effect on, or amplify cognitive biases? (c) Does accountability alter how people think or merely what people say they think? and (d) What goals do accountable decision makers seek to achieve? In addition, this review explores the broader implications of accountability research. It highlights the utility of treating thought as a process of internalized dialogue; the importance of documenting social and institutional boundary conditions on putative cognitive biases; and the potential to craft empirical answers to such applied problems as how to structure accountability relationships in organizations.

[1]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[2]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[3]  G. Mead.  Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead, Vol. 1) , 1934 .

[4]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[5]  R. Morrison.  Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist , 1936 .

[6]  M. Ginsberg.  Human Nature and the Social Order , 1941, Nature.

[7]  C. L. Hull.  Principles of behavior : an introduction to behavior theory , 1943 .

[8]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[9]  L. Cronbach.  Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[11]  R. Zajonc.  SOCIAL FACILITATION. , 1965, Science.

[12]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses , 1966 .

[13]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[14]  C. Kiesler.  The psychology of commitment : experiments linking behavior to belief , 1971 .

[15]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[16]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Ingratiation : an attributional approach , 1973 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[18]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. , 1973 .

[19]  John Bruce Francis,et al.  The Role of Evaluation. , 1974 .

[20]  Joan E. Sieber,et al.  Effects of decision importance on ability to generate warranted subjective uncertainty. , 1974 .

[21]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[23]  John Innes,et al.  The effect of presence of an audience, evaluation apprehension and objective self-awareness on learning , 1975 .

[24]  A. Tesser,et al.  Attitude polarization as a function of thought and reality constraints , 1976 .

[25]  Robert B Cialdini.  Elastic Shifts of Opinion: Determinants of Direction and Durability , 1976 .

[26]  Anticipatory belief change: Persuasion or impression management? , 1976 .

[27]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Reacting to reactance: An Interpersonal interpretation of the need for freedom , 1976 .

[28]  P. H. Lindsay.  Human Information Processing , 1977 .

[29]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Anticipated Discussion of Interpretation Eliminates Actor-Observer Differences in the Attribution of Causality , 1977 .

[30]  P. Rabbit.  Human information processing , 1977, Nature.

[31]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[32]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[33]  R. G. Turner.  Self-consciousness and anticipatory belief change. , 1977 .

[34]  L. Ross,et al.  The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. . , 1977 .

[35]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[36]  S. Streufert,et al.  Behavior in the complex environment. , 1978 .

[37]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Accountability and Helping: When Needs Exceed Resources. , 1978 .

[38]  J. Perrin,et al.  Journal of business finance and accounting , 1978 .

[39]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[40]  George Cvetkovich,et al.  Cognitive accommodation, language, and social responsibility. , 1978 .

[41]  Daniel W. McAllister,et al.  The Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies: An Empirical Test. , 1978 .

[42]  K. Spence.  Behavior Theory and Conditioning , 1978 .

[43]  G. W. Bradley.  Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[44]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late , 1979 .

[45]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  The Trapped Administrator: Effects of Job Insecurity and Policy Resistance upon Commitment to a Course of Action. , 1979 .

[46]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Looking Tough: The Negotiator Under Constituent Surveillance , 1979 .

[47]  Commitment in an Experimenting Society: A Study of the Attribution of Leadership from Administrative Scenarios. , 1980 .

[48]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[49]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A Cognitive Analysis of Japan's 1941 Decision for War , 1980 .

[50]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[51]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[52]  P. Tetlock.  Explaining Teacher Explanations of Pupil Performance; A Self-Presentation Interpretation. , 1980 .

[53]  Edward J. Conlon,et al.  The moderating effects of strategy, visibility, and involvement on allocation behavior: An extension of Staw's escalation paradigm. , 1980 .

[54]  R. Baer,et al.  Reactance as a function of actual versus projected autonomy. , 1980 .

[55]  K. Williams,et al.  Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. , 1981 .

[56]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[57]  P. Anderson.  Justifications and Precedents as Constraints in Foreign Policy Decision- Making , 1981 .

[58]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[59]  A. Eagly,et al.  Anticipatory Belief Polarization as a Function of the Expertise of a Discussion Partner , 1981 .

[60]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[61]  B. R. Schlenker.  Translating Actions into Attitudes: An Identity-Analytic Approach to the Explanation of Social Conduct1 , 1982 .

[62]  A. Tversky,et al.  Causal Schemata in Judgments under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[63]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. , 1982 .

[64]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .

[65]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[66]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Does having to justify one's judgments change the nature of the judgment process? , 1983 .

[67]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability and the perseverance of first impressions. , 1983 .

[68]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability and complexity of thought. , 1983 .

[69]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[70]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Focusing Techniques: A Shortcut to Improving Probability Judgments? , 1984 .

[71]  M. Ross,et al.  Self-persuasion and self-presentation as mediators of anticipatory attitude change. , 1984 .

[72]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  The accountability of conduct : a social psychological analysis , 1984 .

[73]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Impression management versus intrapsychic explanations in social psychology - a useful dichotomy , 1985 .

[74]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. , 1985 .

[75]  S. Harkins,et al.  The Role of Evaluation in Eliminating Social Loafing , 1985 .

[76]  Steven F. Cronshaw,et al.  One answer to the demand for accountability: selection utility as an investment decision , 1985 .

[77]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[78]  R. Abrams,et al.  Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance , 1986 .

[79]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[80]  K. H. Price.  Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing , 1987 .

[81]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The Self and social life , 1987 .

[82]  Christina Maslach,et al.  Individuation, gender role, and dissent: Personality mediators of situational forces. , 1987 .

[83]  D. Hilton,et al.  Base Rates, Representativeness, and the Logic of Conversation: The Contextual Relevance of “Irrelevant” Information , 1991 .

[84]  J. I. Kim,et al.  Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[86]  J. Baxter,et al.  The effect of applicant age, job level, and accountability on the evaluation of job applicants , 1988 .

[87]  Reacting to Reactance , 1988 .

[88]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[89]  Accountability and the debt crisis , 1989 .

[90]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[91]  James F. Wilson.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[92]  Bernard Guerin,et al.  Reducing Evaluation Effects in Mere Presence , 1989 .

[93]  M. Drake.  Management of Information , 1989 .

[94]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[95]  Daniel T. Gilbert,et al.  Thinking backward: some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness , 1989 .

[96]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Conversational conventions, order of information acquisition, and the effect of base rates and individuating information on social judgments. , 1990 .

[97]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Accountability forces in performance appraisal , 1990 .

[98]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression. A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[99]  D. Hilton.  Conversational processes and causal explanation. , 1990 .

[100]  On the formation and regulation of anger and aggression. A cognitive-neoassociationistic analysis. , 1990 .

[101]  Patricia M. Fandt,et al.  The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically , 1990 .

[102]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Politics, Markets, and America's Schools , 1990 .

[103]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus Integration , 1990 .

[104]  S. Kassin,et al.  The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[105]  H. Arkes.  Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. , 1991 .

[106]  W. Moomaw,et al.  Calculating National Accountability for Climate Change , 1991 .

[107]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Accountability and Risk Taking , 1991 .

[108]  Denis J. Hilton,et al.  Conversational Implicature, Conscious Representation, and the Conjunction Fallacy , 1991 .

[109]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in Management: Experimental Investigations of Values, Accountability, and Choice , 1991 .

[110]  D. V. Kreveld,et al.  MANAGING GROUP DECISION MAKING PROCESSES: INDIVIDUAL VERSUS COLLECTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY AND GROUPTHINK , 1991 .

[111]  R. G. Green.  Social motivation. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[112]  R. Baron,et al.  Effects of Expected Communication Target Expertise and Timing of Set on Trait Use in Person Description , 1992 .

[113]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors , 1992 .

[114]  Effect of information order and accountability on causal judgments in a legal context , 1992 .

[115]  C. Kimble,et al.  Playing games before an audience: Social facilitation or choking , 1992 .

[116]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action , 1992 .

[117]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance , 1992 .

[118]  H. Mano.  Judgments under distress: Assessing the role of unpleasantness and arousal in judgment formation , 1992 .

[119]  R. A. Gordon,et al.  The Effect of Anonymity and Increased Accountability on the Linguistic Complexity of Teaching Evaluations , 1992 .

[120]  S. Fiske,et al.  Thinking is for doing: portraits of social cognition from daguerreotype to laserphoto. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[121]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[122]  Accountability Practices of School Psychologists: 1991 National Survey. , 1992 .

[123]  N. Sanders,et al.  Journal of behavioral decision making: "The need for contextual and technical knowledge in judgmental forecasting", 5 (1992) 39-52 , 1992 .

[124]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[125]  Michael E. Enzle,et al.  Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. , 1993 .

[126]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[127]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[128]  G. Bodenhausen.  Emotions, Arousal, and Stereotypic Judgments: A Heuristic Model of Affect and Stereotyping , 1993 .

[129]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[130]  Jane Kennedy,et al.  Debiasing Audit Judgment With Accountability - A Framework And Experimental Results , 1993 .

[131]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Motivational factors in decision theories : the role of self-protection , 1993 .

[132]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. , 1994 .

[133]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims , 1994 .

[134]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[135]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[136]  David Antonioni,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK ACCOUNTABILITY ON UPWARD APPRAISAL RATINGS , 1994 .

[137]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. , 1994 .

[138]  G. Clore,et al.  Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. , 1994 .

[139]  Mark Levine,et al.  Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐group , 1994 .

[140]  R. Murphy.  The Effects of Task Characteristics on Covariation Assessment: The Impact of Accountability and Judgment Frame , 1994 .

[141]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[142]  Samuel D. Miller.  Teachers' responses to test‐driven accountability pressures: “If I change, will my scores drop?” , 1995 .

[143]  «They saw a negotiation»: partisanship and involvement , 1995 .

[144]  M. W. Nelson,et al.  The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting , 1995 .

[145]  G. Marchant,et al.  Justification Of Decisions In Auditing , 1995 .

[146]  J. Baron,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Choice Rules Favored for High-Stakes Decisions , 1995 .

[147]  Efrat Neter,et al.  The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. , 1995 .

[148]  J. Ford,et al.  The roles of information characteristics and accountability in moderating stereotype-driven processes during social decision making , 1995 .

[149]  "The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment": Correction. , 1995 .

[150]  D. Ziebart,et al.  A Model of Financial Incentive Effects in Decision Making , 1995 .

[151]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Encyclopedia of human behavior , 1995 .

[152]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[153]  K. Taylor.  Testing credit and blame attributions as explanation for choices under ambiguity , 1995 .

[154]  C. L. Cox,et al.  The Role of Identifiability in the Reduction of Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity , 1995 .

[155]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Knowing what you'll do: effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[156]  S. J. Motowidlo,et al.  Effects of rater accountability on the accuracy and the favorability of performance ratings. , 1995 .

[157]  Patricia M. Doney,et al.  Effects of accountability on symbolic information search and information analysis by organizational buyers , 1996 .

[158]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  The False Consensus Effect and Overconfidence: Flaws in Judgment or Flaws in How We Study Judgment? , 1996 .

[159]  N. Kerr,et al.  Bias in judgment: Comparing individuals and groups. , 1996 .

[160]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  Mediating Effects of Blame Attributions on Feelings of Anger , 1996 .

[161]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality , 1996 .

[162]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  On Leaping to Conclusions When Feeling Tired: Mental Fatigue Effects on Impressional Primacy , 1996 .

[163]  Marcus Selart,et al.  Structure Compatibility and Restructuring in Judgment and Choice , 1996 .

[164]  L. Emanuel,et al.  What Is Accountability in Health Care? , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[165]  P. Tetlock,et al.  ACCOUNTABILITY AND AUDITORS' JUDGMENTS ABOUT CONTINGENT EVENTS , 1996 .

[166]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. , 1996 .

[167]  Alison L. Chasteen,et al.  Private vs Public Expressions of Racial Prejudice , 1996 .

[168]  L. Sanna,et al.  Expected Evaluation, Goals, and Performance Mood as Input , 1996 .

[169]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? , 1996 .

[170]  C. Macrae,et al.  What the Disinterested Perceiver Overlooks: Goal-Directed Social Categorization , 1996 .

[171]  F. McKenna,et al.  Illusory self-assessments--can they be reduced? , 1997, British journal of psychology.

[172]  Rashed A. Chowdhury.  ACCOUNTS , 1997, Journal of The Royal Naval Medical Service.

[173]  Lynn M. Cornett,et al.  Accountability in the 1990s: Holding Schools Responsible for Student Achievement. , 1997 .

[174]  T. Tyler.  The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[175]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[176]  Julie H. Goldberg,et al.  Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility , 1998 .

[177]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: accuracy x knowledge accessibility effects. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[178]  CURRENT CONTENTS DATABASE , 1998 .

[179]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Accountability for Consequential Decisions: Justifying Ethical Judgments to Audiences , 1999 .

[180]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[181]  Kathleen L. Mosier,et al.  Accountability and automation bias , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..