Determination of inorganic arsenic species in natural waters--benefits of separation and preconcentration on ion exchange and hybrid resins.

A simple method for the separation and determination of inorganic arsenic (iAs) species in natural and drinking water was developed. Procedures for sample preparation, separation of As(III) and As(V) species and preconcentration of the total iAs on fixed bed columns were defined. Two resins, a strong base anion exchange (SBAE) resin and a hybrid (HY) resin were utilized. The inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry method was applied as the analytical method for the determination of the arsenic concentration in water. The governing factors for the ion exchange/sorption of arsenic on resins in a batch and a fixed bed flow system were analyzed and compared. Acidity of the water, which plays an important role in the control of the ionic or molecular forms of arsenic species, was beneficial for the separation; by adjusting the pH values to less than 8.00, the SBAE resin separated As(V) from As(III) in water by retaining As(V) and allowing As(III) to pass through. The sorption activity of the hydrated iron oxide particles integrated into the HY resin was beneficial for bonding of all iAs species over a wide range of pH values from 5.00 to 11.00. The resin capacities were calculated according to the breakthrough points in a fixed bed flow system. At pH 7.50, the SBAE resin bound more than 370 microg g(-1) of As(V) while the HY resin bound more than 4150 microg g(-1) of As(III) and more than 3500 microg g(-1) of As(V). The high capacities and selectivity of the resins were considered as advantageous for the development and application of two procedures, one for the separation and determination of As(III) (with SBAE) and the other for the preconcentration and determination of the total arsenic (with HY resin). Methods were established through basic analytical procedures (with external standards, certified reference materials and the standard addition method) and by the parallel analysis of some samples using the atomic absorption spectrometry-hydride generation technique. The analytical properties of both procedures were similar: the limit of detection was 0.24 microg L(-1), the limit of quantification was 0.80 microg L(-1) and the relative standard deviations for samples with a content of arsenic from 10.00 to 300.0 microg L(-1) ranged from 1.1 to 5.8%. The interference effects of anions commonly found in water and some organic species which can be present in water were found to be negligible. Verification with certified reference materials proved that the experimental concentrations found for model solutions and real samples were in agreement with the certified values.

[1]  P. Smedley,et al.  A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters , 2002 .

[2]  B. Jovanović,et al.  New Approach: Waste Materials as Sorbents for Arsenic Removal from Water , 2010 .

[3]  L. Rajaković,et al.  Arsenic removal from water by chemisorption filters. , 1992, Environmental pollution.

[4]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Inorganic speciation of As(III, V), Se(IV, VI) and Sb(III, V) in natural water with GF-AAS using solid phase extraction technology. , 2007, Talanta.

[5]  Jason A. Day,et al.  A study of method robustness for arsenic speciation in drinking water samples by anion exchange HPLC-ICP-MS , 2002, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[6]  P. Pohl,et al.  Ion-exchange column chromatography: an attempt to speciate arsenic , 2004 .

[7]  M. Simonič Removal of inorganic As5+ from a small drinking water system , 2009 .

[8]  C. Impellitteri Effects of pH and competing anions on the speciation of arsenic in fixed ionic strength solutions by solid phase extraction cartridges. , 2004, Water research.

[9]  L. Rafati,et al.  Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions using Lewatit FO36 nano ion exchange resin , 2009 .

[10]  M. Ristić,et al.  Danube and Sava river sediment monitoring in Belgrade and its surroundings , 2008, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[11]  Shoji Motomizu,et al.  Speciation of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry coupled with preconcentration system. , 2005, Talanta.

[12]  D. Ghosh,et al.  Arsenic removal from groundwater and its safe containment in a rural environment: validation of a sustainable approach. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  L. Rajaković The Sorption of Arsenic onto Activated Carbon Impregnated with Metallic Silver and Copper , 1992 .

[14]  V. Rajaković,et al.  The source, characteristics and distribution of arsenic in the environment , 2005 .

[15]  Y. Madrid,et al.  Stability study of As(III), As(V), MMA and DMA by anion exchange chromatography and HG-AFS in wastewater samples , 2002, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[16]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[17]  K. O’Shea,et al.  Adsorption and photocatalyzed oxidation of methylated arsenic species in TiO2 suspensions. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  M. R. Boldaji,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of a hybrid sorbent resin in removing fluoride from water , 2009 .

[19]  Mariselma Ferreira,et al.  Determination of As(III) and arsenic(V) in natural waters by cathodic stripping voltammetry at a hanging mercury drop electrode , 2002 .

[20]  E. Korngold,et al.  Removal of arsenic from drinking water by anion exchangers , 2001 .

[21]  R. Compton,et al.  Determination of Copper in the Presence of Various Amounts of Arsenic with L-Cysteine Modified Gold Electrodes , 2005 .

[22]  R. H. Loeppert,et al.  Methyl arsenic adsorption and desorption behavior on iron oxides. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Kathleen Shordt,et al.  Arsenic in drinking water. , 2001, Journal of environmental health.