Measuring the efficiency of third party reverse logistics provider in supply chain by multi objective additive network DEA model

The demand for third-party reverse logistics (3PL) provider becomes an increasingly significant issue for corporations seeking improved customer service and cost reduction. Hence, 3PL provider evaluation and selection is an important issue and it has a strategic significance for every company. One of the techniques that can be used for evaluating and selecting 3PL providers is data envelopment analysis (DEA). The traditional models for DEA type performance measurement are based on thinking about production as a ‘black box’. Inputs are transformed in this box into outputs. One of the drawbacks of these models is the neglect of linking activities. An important body of work has been directed at problem settings where the decision making unit (DMU) is characterised by a multistage process; supply chains take this form. Recent DEA literature on serial processes has tended to focus on closed systems, that is, where the outputs from one stage become the inputs to the next stage, and where no other inputs enter the process at any intermediate stage. In this paper, we propose a multi objective additive network DEA model to evaluate and select the most appropriate 3PL providers. Finally, a case study demonstrates the application of the proposed model.

[1]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Resource Allocation Based on Efficiency Analysis , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[2]  Hokey Min,et al.  Benchmarking the operational efficiency of third party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis , 2006 .

[3]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[4]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[5]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Laura Meade,et al.  A conceptual model for selecting and evaluating third‐party reverse logistics providers , 2002 .

[7]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Multiple Objective Approach as an Alternative to Radial Projection in DEA , 2003 .

[8]  Magnus Tambour,et al.  Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Han-Ying Kao,et al.  A Discriminative Multi-Objective Programming Method for Solving Network DEA , 2013 .

[12]  Manish Bachlaus,et al.  Designing an integrated multi-echelon agile supply chain network: a hybrid taguchi-particle swarm optimization approach , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[13]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  B. Çatay,et al.  Third‐party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company , 2007 .

[16]  Wei-Kai Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers , 2009 .

[18]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[19]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2007 .

[20]  W. Cooper,et al.  RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA , 1999 .

[21]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency , 2011 .

[23]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Dusan Stefanovic,et al.  Methodology for modeling and analysis of supply networks , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[25]  Herbert F. Lewis,et al.  Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball , 2003 .

[26]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[27]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Using Super-Efficiency Analysis for Ranking Suppliers in the Presence of Volume Discount Offers , 2008 .

[29]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Keivan Ghoseiri,et al.  Fuzzy dynamic multi-objective Data Envelopment Analysis model , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[32]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Multiobjective target setting in data envelopment analysis using AHP , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[33]  R. Saen,et al.  A Multi-objective Slack Based Measure of Efficiency Model for Weight Derivation in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2011 .

[34]  René V. Mayorga,et al.  Supply chain management: a modular Fuzzy Inference System approach in supplier selection for new product development , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[35]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[37]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Using DEA cross-efficiency evaluation for suppliers ranking in the presence of non-discretionary inputs , 2013 .

[38]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[39]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Internet Based Benchmarking , 2005 .

[40]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A combination of Russell model and neutral DEA for 3PL provider selection , 2012 .

[41]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Timon C. Du,et al.  An evaluation of freight consolidation policies in global third party logistics , 2003 .

[43]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[45]  Irem Ozkarahan,et al.  An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[46]  Jaap Spronk,et al.  Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  Reza Farzipoor Saen Technology selection in the presence of imprecise data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors , 2009 .

[48]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[49]  Wenhuang Liu,et al.  An AHP/DEA Methodology for 3PL Vendor Selection in 4PL , 2005, CSCWD.

[50]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations , 2011 .

[51]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data , 2010 .

[52]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  Computational strategy for Russell measure in DEA: Second-order cone programming , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  Chang Seong Ko,et al.  A hybrid optimization/simulation approach for a distribution network design of 3PLS , 2006, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[54]  Ali Ebrahimnejad,et al.  Target setting in the general combined-oriented CCR model using an interactive MOLP method , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..