Beliefs and the Perception of Risks and Accidents

Identifying the causes of accidents is a necessary prerequisite for preventive action. Some research suggests however that the analysis of accidents does not only differ between experts and laymen but that it is also linked to certain characteristics inherent in the analyst and in the social group to which he belongs: beliefs, value systems, norms, experiences in common, attitudes, roles, social and technical practices, etc. Culturally determined bias seems to affect the perception of risk and the causes of accidents. This article presents a certain number of thoughts and results based upon research carried out on causal attributions of traffic accidents in The Ivory Coast (West Africa) and discusses the importance of culture in risk‐taking and accident prevention. It shows in particular that fatalistic beliefs and mystical practices influence the perception of accidents and consequently incite one to take more risks and neglect safety measures.

[1]  W. A. Harrell.  Accident history and perceived risk of injury as factors influencing fatalism about occupational accidents. , 1995 .

[2]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[3]  James Flynn,et al.  Decidedly Different: Expert and Public Views of Risks from a Radioactive Waste Repository , 1993 .

[4]  C. Clements,et al.  Perceptions of Control: Determinants and Mechanisms , 1993 .

[5]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  The Primacy of Control in Causal Thinking and Attributional Style: An Attributional Functionalism Perspective , 1993 .

[6]  G J Wijlhuizen,et al.  Why are experts not better in judging the danger of filmed traffic conflicts? , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Brenda Nordenstam,et al.  The Perception of Environmental Risks among Ethnically Diverse Groups , 1991 .

[8]  N. Pidgeon.  Safety Culture and Risk Management in Organizations , 1991 .

[9]  Karl Dake.  Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk , 1991 .

[10]  F. Saad.  ROAD ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY PERCEPTION IN URBAN AREAS . COMPENDIUM OF PAPERS. SECOND AFRICAN ROAD SAFETY CONGRESS, ADDIS ABABA, OCTOBER 16-20, 1989. JOINT ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA AND OECD CONGRESS , 1991 .

[11]  M K Lindell,et al.  Effects of the Chernobyl accident on public perceptions of nuclear plant accident risks. , 1990, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  D. R. Kouabénan.  Occupational safety and health problems in Côte d'Ivoire: a diagnosis and some possible remedies. , 1990 .

[13]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. , 1989 .

[14]  M Sivak,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-perception. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  M Sivak,et al.  Cross-cultural differences in driver risk-taking. , 1989, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  C. I. Howarth.  Perceived risk and behavioural feedback: Strategies for reducing accidents and increasing efficiency , 1987 .

[17]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[18]  A K Lund,et al.  Perceived risks and driving behavior. , 1986, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  D. R. Kouabenan.  L'analyse des attributions causales des accidents , 1985 .

[20]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Bias and error in human judgment , 1983 .

[21]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Do accident-involved drivers exhibit riskier everyday driving behavior? , 1982 .

[22]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[23]  Christopher J. Colbourn,et al.  Perceived risk as a determinant of driver behavior , 1978 .

[24]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Who believes in a just world , 1975 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[26]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  Religiousness and derogation of an innocent victim1 , 1974 .

[27]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  Religiousness and derogation of an innocent victim. , 1974, Journal of personality.

[28]  M. Lerner.  Observers evaluation of a victim: Justice, guilt, and veridical perception. , 1971 .

[29]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Defensive attribution-Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident , 1970 .

[30]  M. Lerner,et al.  Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  E. Walster,et al.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J. Moffat.  THE ANATOMY OF RESPONSIBILITY. , 1964, Canadian Medical Association journal.