Technocratic Discourse: A Primer

This article describes the linguistic and semantic features of technocratic discourse using a Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) framework. The article goes further to assert that the function of technocratic discourse in public policy is to advocate and promulgate a highly contentious political and economic agenda under the guise of scientific objectivity and political impartiality. We provide strong evidence to support the linguistic description, and the claims of political advocacy, by analyzing a 900-word document about globalization produced by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

[1]  J. M. Bernstein,et al.  The culture industry : selected essays on mass culture , 1991 .

[2]  Z. Bauman.  On Glocalization: or Globalization for some, Localization for some Others , 1998 .

[3]  Philip Graham,et al.  Hypercapitalism: A Political Economy of Informational Idealism , 2000, New Media Soc..

[4]  J. Mintz.  The Role of Allocation in a Globalized Corporate Income Tax , 1998, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  Herbert Marcuse.  One-Dimensional Man , 1964 .

[6]  J. Lemke.  Textual Politics: Discourse And Social Dynamics , 1995 .

[7]  P. Graham.  Widening the context for interdisciplinary social research : SFL as a method for sociology, anthropology, and communication research , 1999 .

[8]  J. Hoffman.  The Gramscian challenge : coercion and consent in Marxist political theory , 1986 .

[9]  GRAMMATICALISING ECOLOGY: THE POLITICS OF BABY SEALS AND KANGAROOS , 1986 .

[10]  Suzanne Eggins,et al.  An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 1994 .

[11]  P. Graham,et al.  A Theoretical and Analytical Synthesis of Autopoiesis and Sociolinguistics for the Study of Organisational Communication , 2000 .

[12]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[13]  Timothy Bewes.  Cynicism and Postmodernity , 1997 .

[14]  P. Kennedy.  Coming to Terms with Contemporary Capitalism: Beyond the Idealism of Globalisation and Capitalist Ascendancy Arguments , 1998 .

[15]  J. Henry.  Property Rights, Markets and Economic Theory: Keynes versus Neoclassicism - again , 1999 .

[16]  Renate Holub,et al.  Antonio Gramsci: Beyond Marxism and Postmodernism , 1992 .

[17]  P. Graham.  Critical Systems Theory , 1999 .

[18]  Paul Reese.  An Annotated Bibliography of The Journal of Technical Writing and Communication: 1981–1984 , 1985 .

[19]  J. R. Martin.  Grace: The Logogenesis of Freedom , 1999 .

[20]  Miss A.O. Penney.  (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[21]  Pam Morris,et al.  The Bakhtin reader : selected writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov , 1997 .

[22]  M. Pusey.  Economic Rationalism in Canberra: A Nation-Building State Changes its Mind , 1989 .

[23]  D. Tetzlaff.  Divide and conquer: popular culture and social control in late capitalism , 1991 .

[24]  M. Pusey.  Economic Rationalism and the Contest for Civil Society , 1996 .

[25]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Does globalization lower wages and export jobs , 1997 .

[26]  F. Argy.  Australia at the Crossroads: Radical Free Market or a Progressive Liberalism? , 1999 .

[27]  Bernard McKenna.  How Engineers Write: An Empirical Study of Engineering Report Writing , 1997 .

[29]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  Writing Science: Literacy And Discursive Power , 1993 .

[30]  J. R. Bjerklie.  The end of work—The decline of the global labor force and the dawn of the post-market era, , 1996 .

[31]  E. Barrett.  Sociomedia: multimedia, hypermedia, and the social construction of knowledge , 1992 .

[32]  W. A. Sherden.  The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions , 1997 .