Neural basis of the non‐attentional processing of briefly presented words

The neural basis of the automatic activation of words was investigated in an fMRI study. In the study, words were presented briefly (51 or 151 msec) followed by a mask. To prevent attentional processing, subjects attended to the masks and not the words, and were required to make perceptual judgment about the masks. We found that a distributed neural network (including the frontal, temporal, occipital, parietal lobes, and the cerebellum) was activated during non‐attentional processing of words in both exposure durations. A significant main effect of presentation duration was found in bilateral cerebellum and the right fusiform gyrus, suggesting their role in the later (151 msec) processing of words. In addition, a significant interaction between presentation duration and word frequency was obtained. When the presentation duration was 151 msec, no significant difference in activation was found between high‐ and low‐frequency words. Alternatively, when the presentation duration was 51 msec, high‐frequency words evoked significantly greater activation in bilateral fusiform gyri, cerebellum, right inferior parietal lobe, medial frontal gyrus (BA 45/46/9), and the right temporal‐occipital junction (BA 21/37). These results suggest that these regions are sensitive to word frequency, and are related to both the attentional and non‐attentional access of lexical representations. Hum. Brain Mapping 18:215–221, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. A. Becker Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification , 1998 .

[3]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  P. Strick,et al.  Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function. , 1994, Science.

[6]  P T Fox,et al.  Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: A functional MRI study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[7]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. , 1991 .

[8]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A functional disconnection between spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from unconscious priming , 2001, Cognition.

[9]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[11]  J. Bower,et al.  Cerebellum Implicated in Sensory Acquisition and Discrimination Rather Than Motor Control , 1996, Science.

[12]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[13]  Hermann Ackermann,et al.  Cerebellar contributions to cognition , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  S. Petersen,et al.  Effects of Lexicality, Frequency, and Spelling-to-Sound Consistency on the Functional Anatomy of Reading , 1999, Neuron.

[16]  C. Fiebach,et al.  fMRI Evidence for Dual Routes to the Mental Lexicon in Visual Word Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.