Speed management via in-car devices: effects, implications, perspectives

The objectives of this paper are to identify in-vehicle systems for speed management that have been or are being developed, and to suggest recommendations for the implementation of systems that will effectively influence driving speeds and thereby significantly increase safety. The best safety effect is expected from an "intelligent" gas pedal, more specifically the automatic speed limiter. However, in terms of user acceptance, this system is least liked, although, acceptance seems to improve after it has been tried out. Nonetheless, the final goal for implementation should be a mandatory speed limiter system, starting with voluntary usage supported with educational measures. A period of car producers' standardisation of ISA-systems should be followed by legislation prescribing that all new vehicles are to be fitted with the system. Finally, some questions regarding further research are outlined.

[1]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  The Effects of ATT and Non-ATT Systems and Treatments on Driver Speed Behaviour , 1997 .

[2]  Mohsen Towliat,et al.  Hastighetsbegränsare i bil. Fältstudie av hastigheter, beteenden, konflikter och förarkommentarer vid körning i tätort , 1993 .

[3]  Lena Nilsson,et al.  DRIVER ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOURAL CHANGES RELATED TO PRESENTATION OF ROADSIDE INFORMATION INSIDE THE CAR: A PILOT STUDY OF THE CAROSI SYSTEM , 1992 .

[4]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Dynamic speed adaptation based on information technology - a theoretical background , 1997 .

[5]  Markku Salusjärvi THE SPEED LIMIT EXPERIMENTS ON PUBLIC ROADS IN FINLAND , 1980 .

[6]  A. Lund,et al.  The duration of speed reductions attributable to radar detectors. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  G. Maycock,et al.  SPEED, SPEED LIMITS AND ACCIDENTS , 1994 .

[8]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Behavioural adaptation of drivers to warning and tutoring messages: results from an on-the-road and simulator test , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Warning Signal Design: A Key Human Factors Issue in an In-Vehicle Front-To-Rear-End Collision Warning System , 1992 .

[10]  R Elvik,et al.  The effects of speed enforcement on individual road user behaviour and accidents , 1991 .

[11]  S L Comte Response to automatic speed control in urban areas:A simulator study. , 1996 .

[12]  Magda Draskoczy,et al.  Present speeds and speed management methods in Europe , 1998 .

[13]  K. S. Rutley,et al.  CONTROL OF DRIVERS' SPEED BY MEANS OTHER THAN ENFORCEMENT , 1975 .

[14]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  SPEED ENFORCEMENT AND SPEED CHOICE , 1982 .

[15]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  Elderly and young driver's reaction to an in-car enforcement and tutoring system. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Sven Dahlstedt THE SARTRE TABLES: OPINIONS ABOUT TRAFFIC AND TRAFFIC SAFETY OF SOME EUROPEAN DRIVERS , 1994 .

[17]  M Zarean,et al.  RURAL APPLICATIONS OF ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS: USER NEEDS AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT , 1997 .

[18]  Kerstin Westin,et al.  Elektroniska "fartkollare" i Umeå. , 1997 .

[19]  T. Risley,et al.  Reduction of police vehicle accidents through mechaniically aided supervision. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Evaluation of in-car speed limiters – Field study , 1998 .