Language Use in Normal Speakers and its Disorders 1 . The Architecture of Normal Spoken Language Use

The normal language user's production and understanding of speech involves the highly skilled coordination of myriad processes. When a speaker conceives of some communicative intention, he will select and order information whose expression may realize that intention. He will also formulate that information, i. e., give it linguistic shape. This includes retrieving the appropriate words from memory and assigning them their proper grammatical roles and syntactic positions. The speaker will further compute a phonetic specification for the developing utterance, and use it to guide the articulatory execution that produces overt speech. The addressee will normally try to reconstruct the speaker's communicative intentions. She will perform an acoustic-phonetic analysis on the continuous speech signal in order to segment it into recognizable words and phrases. She will retrieve the syntactic properties and meanings of successive words and parse the string into meaningful phrases and sentences. And she will interpret this information in terms of the context of interaction, the purpose of the exchange, the presuppositions about the speaker's intentions, etc. This complex system operates largely unawares. A speaker concentrates his attention on what is to be said, not on how it is to be done. The rate of fluent speech, some 2 to 3 words per second, is too high for a speaker to ponder over each and every word or syntactic construction. And there is no way for a speaker to consciously prepare some fifteen speech sounds per second. Similarly, the listener normally attends to the content of what is said, not to the phonetic shape of words or the syntactic complexities of the utterance. Like in all other skills, the lower level processes are automatic, They don't use central resources; they come for free. In the following I will outline the architecture of this skill. This involves the dissection of the speech processing system into component subsystems. It also involves a characterization of the representations computed by the processing components as well as the manner in which these representations are computed. And it requires a specification of how the processing components cooperate in producing their joint product. These matters will be discussed in reference to Figure 1.1. It is a 'blueprint' of the language user, depicting the main processing components and their connections. We will proceed anticlockwise through the system, beginning at the highest conceptual level at which the speaker generates information to be expressed. We will follow the flow of information down to articulation, the generation of overt speech. We will then turn to the perception and parsing of speech, back to the conceptual interpretative level. After this grand tour some remarks will be made about the modes of cooperation between the various components, in particular about incrementality and autonomy of processing.

[1]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[2]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Lexical effects in phonemic processing: facilitatory or inhibitory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[4]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[5]  K. Bock An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[7]  G. Kempen,et al.  A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: Evidence from experimentally elicited corrections , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[9]  P. Denes On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[10]  Stanford Universi Common Ground and the Understanding of Demonstrative Reference , 2004 .

[11]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Auditory lexical access: where do we start? , 1989 .

[12]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[15]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse , 1988 .

[16]  Reed E Davis,et al.  A Review of Selected Models. , 1982 .

[17]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Perceptual Structures and Distributed Motor Control , 1981 .

[18]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[19]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable , 1991 .

[20]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[21]  D. Klatt Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .

[22]  G. Nunberg The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy , 1979 .

[23]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[24]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Incremental Sentence Generation: Implications for the Structure of a Syntactic Processor , 1982, COLING.

[25]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning , 1989 .

[26]  Hans Hörmann The Calculating Listener, or: How Many are einige, mehrere and ein paar (Some, Several, and a Few)? , 1983 .

[27]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[28]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Polite responses to polite requests , 1980, Cognition.

[29]  A. Meyer The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆ , 1990 .

[30]  L. Tyler,et al.  Local and Global Structure in Spoken Language Comprehension , 1987 .

[31]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[32]  H. Grice Utterer’s Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning , 1968 .

[33]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[34]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[35]  A. Crompton,et al.  Syllables and segments in speech production , 1981 .

[36]  Janet Lee Jones Multiple access of homonym meanings: An artifact of backward priming? , 1989 .

[37]  K. Scherer Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Lexical retrieval: The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon , 1987, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[39]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Speech Perception as a Cognitive Process: The Interactive Activation Model. , 1983 .

[40]  Daniel G. Morrow,et al.  Interpreting Words in Spatial Descriptions , 1988 .

[41]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[42]  H. H. Clark Responding to indirect speech acts , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Lori Alice Taft,et al.  Prosodic constraints and lexical parsing strategies , 1985 .

[44]  J. Kelso,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[45]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Speech shadowing and speech comprehension , 1985, Speech Commun..

[46]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Against lexical generation of syntax , 1989 .

[47]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing , 1989 .

[48]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[49]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[50]  A. Cutler Slips of the Tongue and Language Production , 1982 .

[51]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[52]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[53]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[54]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  On the pretense theory of irony. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  Jay L. Garfield,et al.  Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding , 1987 .

[56]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[57]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language , 1985 .

[58]  Willem J. M. Levelt Lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[59]  D. Morrow Places as referents in discourse , 1986 .

[60]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Intermediate level of analysis: features or segments? , 1990 .