Modelling experts’ attitudes in group decision making

Nowadays, important decisions that have a significant impact either in societies or in organizations are commonly made by a group rather than a single decision maker, which might require more than a majority rule to obtain a real acceptance. Consensus-reaching processes provide a way to drive group decisions which are more accepted and appreciated by people affected by such a decision. These processes care about different consensus measures to determine the agreement in the group. The correct choice of a consensus measure that reflects the attitude of decision makers is a key issue for improving and optimizing consensus-reaching processes, which still requires further research. This paper studies the concept of group’s attitude towards consensus, and presents a consensus model that integrates it in the measurement of consensus, through an extension of OWA aggregation operators, the so-called Attitude-OWA. The approach is applied to the solution of a real-like group decision making problem with the definition of different attitudes, and the results are analysed.

[1]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: Models, Methods and Applications , 2010 .

[2]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  A fuzzy consensus aggregation operator , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Xinwang Liu,et al.  Orness and parameterized RIM quantifier aggregation with OWA operators: A summary , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  N. Bryson Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content , 1996 .

[5]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  R. Yager Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators , 1996, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[7]  J. Kacprzyk Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority , 1986 .

[8]  R. Yager Families of OWA operators , 1993 .

[9]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[10]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  A `human-consistent' degree of consensus based on fuzzy login with linguistic quantifiers , 1989 .

[11]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[12]  Petr Ekel,et al.  A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[13]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with a Linguistic Assessment Approach , 1995, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Consensual Processes , 2011, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[16]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Fuzzy aggregation of numerical preferences , 1999 .

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[18]  L. Martínez,et al.  CHALLENGES FOR IMPROVING CONSENSUS REACHING PROCESS IN COLLECTIVE DECISIONS , 2007 .

[19]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[20]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  A Consensus Support System Model for Group Decision-Making Problems With Multigranular Linguistic Preference Relations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[21]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Adaptive Consensus Support Model for Group Decision-Making Problems in a Multigranular Fuzzy Linguistic Context , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[22]  Naif Alajlan,et al.  Human-inspired Identification of High-level Concepts using OWA and Linguistic Quantifiers , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[23]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control , 1994 .

[24]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Soft consensus and network dynamics in group decision making , 1999, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences , 1988 .

[26]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Fuzzy sets and decision analysis , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[27]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making , 2001, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[29]  Zhiwei Lin,et al.  Concordance and consensus , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[31]  Janusz Kacprzyk,et al.  An Internet-based Group Decision and Consensus Reaching Support System , 2003 .

[32]  Gleb Beliakov,et al.  Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners , 2007, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[33]  L. Zadeh A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[34]  Slawomir Zadrozny,et al.  Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching , 2010, Soft Comput..