Evaluation of cost functions for gray value matching of two-dimensional images in radiotherapy.

In external beam radiotherapy, portal imaging is applied for verification of the patient setup. Current automatic methods for portal image registration, which are often based on segmentation of anatomical structures, are especially successful for images of the pelvic region. For portal images of more complicated anatomical structures, e.g., lung, these techniques are less successful. It is desirable to have a method for image registration that is applicable for a wide range of treatment sites. In this study, a registration method for two-dimensional (2D) registration of portal and reference images based on intensity values was tested on portal images of various anatomical sites. Tests were performed with and without preprocessing (unsharp mask filtering followed by histogram equalization) for 96 image pairs and six cost functions. The images were obtained from treatments of the rectum, salivary gland, brain, prostate, and lung. To get insight into the behavior of the various cost functions, cost function values were computed for each portal image for 20,000 transformations of the corresponding reference image, translating the reference image in a range of +/- 1 cm and rotating +/- 10 degrees with respect to the clinical match. The automatic match was defined as the transformation associated with the global minimum (found by an exhaustive search). Without preprocessing, the registration reliability was low (less than 27%). With preprocessing, about 90% of the matches were successful, with a difference with our gold standard (manual registration) of about 1 mm and 1 degree SD. All tested cost functions performed similarly. However, the number of local minima using mutual information was larger than for the other tested cost functions. A cost function based on the mean product of the corresponding pixel values had the least number of local minima. In conclusion, gray value based registration of portal images is applicable for a wide range of treatment sites. However, pre-processing of the images is essential.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic verification of radiation field shape using digital portal images. , 1992, Medical physics.

[3]  G W Sherouse,et al.  Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiotherapy treatment design. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M van Herk,et al.  Optimization of automatic portal image analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  M van Herk,et al.  Fast evaluation of patient set-up during radiotherapy by aligning features in portal and simulator images. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  P. Munro,et al.  Clinical use of electronic portal imaging: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 58. , 2001, Medical physics.

[9]  D L Hill,et al.  Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images. , 2001, Medical physics.

[10]  D. R. Fish,et al.  A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. , 1994, Medical physics.

[11]  A L Boyer,et al.  An image correlation procedure for digitally reconstructed radiographs and electronic portal images. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  M van Herk,et al.  Radiation field edge detection in portal images. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  L Dong,et al.  A portal image alignment and patient setup verification procedure using moments and correlation techniques. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M van Herk,et al.  Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.

[17]  J Kim,et al.  A feasibility study of mutual information based setup error estimation for radiotherapy. , 2001, Medical physics.