The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin‐Off Venture Emergence

This paper aims to better understand the development of entrepreneurial competencies to create new ventures within the non-commercial academic environment. We build upon the evolutionary perspective considering where resources come from to help define these competencies and explain their paths of development. The study follows the creation and early growth of four university spin-offs within the UK and Norway. We identified three competencies of opportunity refinement, leveraging, and championing that appeared crucial for the ventures to gain credibility. Although selected competencies were inherent within the academic founders, the specific competencies for venture creation had to be developed or acquired. This was achieved iteratively through entrepreneurial experience and accessing competencies from disparate actors such as industry partners and equity investors. Propositions are offered to guide future empirical research based upon our framework.

[1]  Robert A. Burgelman A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[2]  B. Clarysse,et al.  How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective , 2004 .

[3]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future * , 2001 .

[4]  M. Marcelli,et al.  Design and Methods , 2011 .

[5]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Where do resources come from? a model of resource generation , 1999 .

[6]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[7]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Entry by Spinoffs , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  Science parks and incubators: Observations, synthesis and future research , 2005 .

[9]  Tommy Høyvarde Clausen,et al.  Parallel business models and the innovativeness of research-based spin-off ventures , 2013 .

[10]  A. Agrawal Engaging the Inventor: Exploring Licensing Strategies for University Inventions and the Role of Latent Knowledge , 2006 .

[11]  Mike Wright,et al.  Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy , 2006 .

[12]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation , 2006 .

[13]  Mike Wright,et al.  Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[14]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[15]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Simcha Jong,et al.  How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry , 2006 .

[17]  M. Wright,et al.  Spinning Out New Ventures: A Typology of Incubation Strategies from European Research Institutions , 2005 .

[18]  Benyamin Lichtenstein,et al.  How Do “Resource Bundles” Develop and Change in New Ventures? A Dynamic Model and Longitudinal Exploration , 2001 .

[19]  Stanislav D. Dobrev,et al.  Organizational Roles and Transitions to Entrepreneurship Организационные роли и переходы к предпринимательству , 2005 .

[20]  Thomas M. Cooney What is an Entrepreneurial Team , 2005 .

[21]  Jane M. Howell Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: key predictors of project performance , 2001 .

[22]  Subodh Bhat,et al.  Opportunity Recognition: An Exploratory Investigation of a Component of the Entrepreneurial Process in the Context of the Health Care Industry , 2000 .

[23]  A. van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Companion to organizations , 2002 .

[24]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy , 2002 .

[25]  Scott Shane,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  C. Brush,et al.  The Corporate Venture Champion: A Resource-Based Approach to Role and Process , 1999 .

[27]  Benoît Godin,et al.  The New Economy: what the concept owes to the OECD , 2004 .

[28]  T. Baker,et al.  Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage , 2005 .

[29]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[30]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[31]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  When Does University Research Get Commercialized? Creating Ambidexterity in Research Institutions , 2008 .

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[33]  Daniel S. Fogel,et al.  Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications , 1994 .

[34]  Barbara Czarniawska A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies , 1998 .

[35]  Martin Kenney,et al.  The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: a comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford , 2004 .

[36]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? , 2003 .

[37]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[38]  D. Polkinghorne Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences , 2010 .

[39]  S. Zahra,et al.  Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization , 2002 .

[40]  T. Lau,et al.  The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises - A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies , 2002 .

[41]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[42]  Steven H. Hanks,et al.  Founder Competence, the Environment, and Venture Performance , 1994 .

[43]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[44]  Mike Wright,et al.  From Human Capital to Social Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Technology–Based Academic Entrepreneurs , 2007 .

[45]  Y. Lee,et al.  'TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER' AND THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY : A SEARCH FOR THE BOUNDARIES OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION , 1996 .

[46]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources , 2007 .

[47]  Diana L. Day Raising Radicals: Different Processes for Championing Innovative Corporate Ventures , 1994 .

[48]  R. Gulati Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation ? , 2007 .

[49]  Mike Wright,et al.  Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies , 2005 .

[50]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[51]  Donna J. Kelley,et al.  A competency‐based framework for promoting corporate entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[52]  M. Lounsbury Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy and the Acquisition of Resources , 2001 .

[53]  J. Orton From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data , 1997 .

[54]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2000 .

[55]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[56]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[57]  Stephen K. Markham,et al.  A Longitudinal Examination of How Champions Influence Others to Support Their Projects , 1998 .

[58]  Richard N. Cardozo,et al.  A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development , 2003 .

[59]  P. Westhead,et al.  Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms , 1995 .

[60]  S. Sarasvathy Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency , 2001 .

[61]  R. Ireland,et al.  A Model of Middle–Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior , 2005 .

[62]  J. Barney,et al.  The Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm , 2007 .

[63]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[64]  B. Leca,et al.  A Critical Realist Approach To Institutional Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[65]  B. Clarysse,et al.  A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off , 2004 .

[66]  P. Downward,et al.  Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: Reorienting economics into social science , 2006 .

[67]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[68]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Initial Human and Financial Capital as Predictors of New Venture Performance , 1994 .

[69]  David V. Gibson,et al.  University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin , 1990 .

[70]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .

[71]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory , 2001 .

[72]  Luca Grilli,et al.  Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view , 2005 .

[73]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[74]  Heidi M. Neck,et al.  An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation , 2004 .

[75]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[76]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[77]  James R. Johnson Technology transfer and Universities , 1988 .

[78]  Mike Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-Out Strategies , 2003 .

[79]  M. Wright,et al.  Research and Technology Commercialization , 2008 .

[80]  Riccardo Fini,et al.  Complements or Substitutes? The Role of Universities and Local Context in Supporting the Creation of Academic Spin-offs , 2010 .

[81]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[82]  Mike Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity , 2006 .

[83]  Mike Wright,et al.  Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies , 2004 .

[84]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation , 2004 .

[85]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[86]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Time pacing: competing in markets that won't stand still. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[87]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature , 2007 .

[88]  M. Bhave A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation , 1994 .

[89]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe , 2007 .

[90]  A. Grandi,et al.  Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas , 2005 .

[91]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .