Mobility management of Internet of Things: Protocols, challenges and open issues

Present day applications and technologies are continuing to drive the growth and demand in existing, and emerging fields of research. The largest change encouraging many researchers and academics to study and businesses to invest in, is the Internet of Things (IoT). IoT devices are mainly Mobile Nodes (MNs) that require Mobility Management Protocols (MMPs) to be in place, to provide transparent services to users without experiencing interruptions or disconnections. Several issues and challenges impact the communication existing between mobile nodes within a mobile IP enabled network such as packet loss, end-to-end delay, increased handover latency, increased signalling costs and power consumption. Some of the issues can be minimised by implementing new mobile IP protocols or through enhancing existing ones. This paper discusses and examines some of the important issues and challenges along with a comparative analysis and comparison of mobility management protocols and characteristics in common.

[1]  Shadi Aljawarneh,et al.  Investigations of automatic methods for detecting the polymorphic worms signatures , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[2]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  Performance Analysis of Fast Handover in Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2003, PWC.

[3]  Shadi Aljawarneh,et al.  Cloud security engineering: Early stages of SDLC , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[4]  Comparison Of Mobility Management In Mobileipv4 & Mobileipv6 Networks , 2013 .

[5]  Inwhee Joe,et al.  An efficient inter-domain handover scheme with minimized latency for PMIPv6 , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[6]  Subramaniam Shamala,et al.  A cluster-based proxy mobile IPv6 for IP-WSNs , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[7]  Dan Keun Sung,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of an Energy-Efficient Mobility Management Scheme in IP-Based Wireless Networks† , 2011, Sensors.

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[9]  Hwang Chong-Sun,et al.  Analysis of Signaling Load of Mobile IPv6 and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 , 2005 .

[10]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.

[12]  Jean-Christophe Deprez,et al.  Mobility Management for Wireless Sensor Networks A State-of-the-Art , 2015, ANT/SEIT.

[13]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[14]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IP , 1997, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Md. Motaharul Islam,et al.  Sensor Proxy Mobile IPv6 (SPMIPv6)—A Novel Scheme for Mobility Supported IP-WSNs , 2011, Sensors.

[16]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  Hyun-Su Kim,et al.  CoAP-Based Mobility Management for the Internet of Things , 2015, Sensors.

[18]  Shadi Aljawarneh,et al.  A resource-efficient encryption algorithm for multimedia big data , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[19]  Soonghwan Ro,et al.  Inter-domain mobility support in Proxy Mobile IPv6 using overlap function of mobile access gateway , 2015, Wirel. Networks.

[20]  Dave Evans,et al.  How the Next Evolution of the Internet Is Changing Everything , 2011 .

[21]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) , 2014, RFC.

[22]  Shadi Aljawarneh,et al.  A Conceptual Security Framework for Cloud Computing Issues , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[24]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6) , 2005, RFC.

[25]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6) , 1996, RFC.

[26]  Mohammed Atiquzzaman,et al.  Performance Comparison between NEMO BSP and SINEMO , 2008, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[27]  Myung-Ki Shin,et al.  Handover Latency Analysis of a Network-Based Localized Mobility Management Protocol , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.