Investigating User Confidence for Uncertainty Presentation in Predictive Decision Making

Machine Learning (ML) based decision support systems are often like a black box to non-expert users. Here user's confidence becomes critical for effective decision making and maintaining trust in the system. We find that user confidence varies significantly depending on supplementary material presented on screen. We investigate change in user confidence (in the context of ML based decision making) by varying level of uncertainty presented (in an online water-pipe failure prediction case study) and find that all 26 subjects rated higher uncertainty task to be most difficult and had lowest user confidence in predictive decisions of the same. This agrees with our expectation that increased uncertainty would reduce user confidence in predictive decision making. However, ML-researchers subgroup reported being most confident when uncertainty with known probability was presented, whereas other subgroups (viz. general staff and non-ML researchers) appeared most confident when uncertainty was not at all presented. This is an original research to improve understanding of user's decision making confidence with respect to uncertainty presented in machine learning context.

[1]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[2]  S. Joslyn,et al.  Decisions With Uncertainty: The Glass Half Full , 2013 .

[3]  M. Platt,et al.  Risky business: the neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[5]  P. Morgado,et al.  The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty , 2015, Journal of neuroscience research.

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[7]  Yang Wang,et al.  Measurable Decision Making with GSR and Pupillary Analysis for Intelligent User Interface , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[8]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing , 2012 .

[9]  Susan Joslyn,et al.  The Cry Wolf Effect and Weather‐Related Decision Making , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Neural Systems Responding to Degrees of Uncertainty in Human Decision-Making , 2005, Science.

[11]  Yang Wang,et al.  Interactive Mouse Stream as Real-Time Indicator of User's Cognitive Load , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Yang Wang,et al.  Water pipe condition assessment: a hierarchical beta process approach for sparse incident data , 2014, Machine Learning.

[13]  Dane K. Peterson,et al.  Confidence, uncertainty, and the use of information , 1988 .

[14]  Susan Joslyn,et al.  Probability or frequency? Expressing forecast uncertainty in public weather forecasts , 2009 .

[15]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Neural Signatures of Economic Preferences for Risk and Ambiguity , 2006, Neuron.

[16]  Sabina Kleitman,et al.  The Role of Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgments , 2002, The Journal of general psychology.

[17]  Pamela M Allen,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Load on Decision Making with Graphically Displayed Uncertainty Information , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Choice Certainty Is Informed by Both Evidence and Decision Time , 2014, Neuron.

[19]  M. Granger Morgan,et al.  Graphical Communication of Uncertain Quantities to Nontechnical People , 1987 .

[20]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. , 2012, Psychological review.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  M. Usher,et al.  Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account , 2015, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Robert L Winkler,et al.  The Importance of Communicating Uncertainties in Forecasts: Overestimating the Risks from Winter Storm Juno , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.