Using the simplified falling head technique to detect temporal changes in field-saturated hydraulic conductivity at the surface of a sandy loam soil

Abstract Determining temporal changes in field-saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K fs ) is important for understanding and modeling hydrological phenomena at the field scale. Little is known about temporal variability of K fs values measured at permanent sampling points. In this investigation, the simplified falling head (SFH) technique was used for an approximately 2-year period to determine temporal changes in K fs at 11 permanent sampling points established at the surface of a sandy loam soil. Additional K fs measurements were obtained by the single-ring pressure infiltrometer (PI) technique to also compare the SFH and PI techniques. The lowest mean values of K fs , M ( K fs ), were detected in December and January (20.5 ≤  M ( K fs ) ≤ 146.2 mm h −1 ), whereas higher results (190.5 ≤  M ( K fs ) ≤ 951.9 mm h −1 ) were obtained in the other months of the year. The K fs values were higher and less variable in the dry soil ( θ i  ≤ 0.21 m 3  m −3 , M ( K fs ) = 340.6 mm h −1 , CV( K fs ) = 106%) than in the wet one ( θ i  > 0.21 m 3  m −3 , M ( K fs ) = 78.4 mm h −1 , CV( K fs ) = 185%). Both wet and dry soil were less conductive at the end of the study period than at the beginning one but a more appreciable change was detected for the dry soil ( K fs decreasing by 83.4%) than for the wet one ( K fs decreasing by 63.0%). The simple SFH technique yielded K fs results similar to the more laborious and time-consuming PI technique (i.e., mean values differing at the most by a factor of two). It was concluded that (i) the soil water content was an important factor affecting the K fs results obtained in a relatively coarse-textured soil, (ii) the impact of time from the beginning of the experiment on the saturated hydraulic conductivity was larger for a repeated sampling of dry soil than of wet soil and (iii) the SFH technique yielded reliable K fs results in a relatively short period of time without the need for extensive instrumentation or analytical methodology.

[1]  David E. Elrick,et al.  Infiltration from Constant‐Head Well Permeameters and Infiltrometers , 1992 .

[2]  J. Philip Falling head ponded infiltration , 1992 .

[3]  Jim W Hall,et al.  Temporal trends in soil properties at a soil quality benchmark site in the Lower Fraser Valley, British Columbia , 2002 .

[4]  R. Rudra,et al.  Seasonal Variability of Hydraulic Conductivity , 1993 .

[5]  N. Lamaddalena,et al.  Effect of Tillage on the Hydraulic Properties of a Vertic Soil , 1998 .

[6]  J. Bouma Measuring the Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Horizons with Continuous Macropores1 , 1982 .

[7]  C. Drury,et al.  Comparison of Tension Infiltrometer, Pressure Infiltrometer, and Soil Core Estimates of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity , 2000 .

[8]  M. Iovino,et al.  A simplified falling-head technique for rapid determination of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2004 .

[9]  D. Cassel Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Physical Properties Following Tillage of Norfolk Loamy Sand 1 , 1983 .

[10]  M. Iovino,et al.  Factors affecting measurement of the near-saturated soil hydraulic conductivity. , 2000 .

[11]  V. Bagarello,et al.  Using the single-ring infiltrometer method to detect temporal changes in surface soil field-saturated hydraulic conductivity , 2003 .

[12]  G. Vachaud,et al.  Temporal Stability of Spatially Measured Soil Water Probability Density Function , 1985 .

[13]  M. Iovino,et al.  A laboratory analysis of falling head infiltration procedures for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of soils , 2006 .

[14]  A. Mermoud,et al.  Modeling the soil water balance based on time-dependent hydraulic conductivity under different tillage practices , 2003 .

[15]  G. Starr,et al.  Assessing temporal stability and spatial variability of soil water patterns with implications for precision water management , 2005 .

[16]  Artemi Cerdà,et al.  Seasonal and spatial variations in infiltration rates in badland surfaces under Mediterranean climatic conditions , 1999 .

[17]  J. D. Jabro Variability of Field-Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in a Hagerstown Soil as Affected by Initial Water Content , 1996 .

[18]  T. Kaspar,et al.  Positional and Temporal Changes in Ponded Infiltration in a Corn Field , 1994 .

[19]  W. D. Reynolds Saturated hydraulic conductivity : field measurement , 1993 .

[20]  Giuseppe Provenzano,et al.  Factors Affecting Field and Laboratory Measurement of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity , 1996 .

[21]  M. Iovino,et al.  MEASURING HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN A CRACKING CLAY SOIL USING THE GUELPH PERMEAMETER , 1999 .

[22]  G. Gee,et al.  Particle-size Analysis , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[23]  T. Tsegaye,et al.  Integrated Assessment of Space, Time, and Management-Related Variability of Soil Hydraulic Properties , 1999 .

[24]  J. A. Gomez,et al.  Analysis of sources of variability of runoff volume in a 40 plot experiment using a numerical model , 2001 .

[25]  M. Flury,et al.  Hydraulic Properties in a Silt Loam Soil under Natural Prairie, Conventional Till, and No‐Till , 2004 .

[26]  J. Starr Spatial and temporal variation of ponded infiltration. , 1990 .

[27]  E. Gregorich,et al.  Changes in soil physical properties with depth in a conventionally tilled soil after no-tillage , 1993 .

[28]  David E. Daniel,et al.  Hydraulic conductivity and waste contaminant transport in soil , 1994 .

[29]  R. Horton,et al.  EFFECT OF CULTIVATION ON HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF AN IOWA SOIL USING TENSION INFILTROMETERS1 , 1998 .

[30]  R. J. Luxmoore,et al.  Estimating Macroporosity in a Forest Watershed by use of a Tension Infiltrometer1 , 1986 .

[31]  Lehua Pan,et al.  Measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity using a generalized solution for single-ring infiltrometers , 1999 .

[32]  W. Reynolds,et al.  Hydraulic Conductivity in a Clay Soil: Two Measurement Techniques and Spatial Characterization , 1996 .

[33]  Brent Clothier,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THREE FIELD METHODS FOR MEASURING SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 1985 .

[34]  D. Hillel Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[35]  T. Astatkie,et al.  Spatial and temporal trends in soil properties at a soil quality benchmark site in central Nova Scotia , 2000 .

[36]  Rafael Angulo-Jaramillo,et al.  Field measurement of soil surface hydraulic properties by disc and ring infiltrometers: A review and recent developments , 2000 .

[37]  J. A. Gomez,et al.  Spatial variability of surface roughness and hydraulic conductivity after disk tillage: implications for runoff variability , 2005 .

[38]  H. D. Scott,et al.  Temporal Variability of Selected Properties of Loessial Soil as Affected by Cropping , 1994 .

[39]  Harold M. van Es,et al.  Evaluation of temporal, spatial, and tillage-induced variability for parameterization of soil infiltration , 1993 .

[40]  W. Emmerich SEASON AND EROSION PAVEMENT INFLUENCE ON SATURATED SOIL HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY , 2003 .

[41]  K. O. Adekalu,et al.  Tillage effects on bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and strength of a loamy sand soil in southwestern Nigeria , 2005 .

[42]  I. Messing,et al.  Seasonal variation in field-saturated hydraulic conductivity in two swelling clay soils in Sweden , 1990 .

[43]  M. R. Carter,et al.  Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis , 1993 .

[44]  David E. Elrick,et al.  A Method for Simultaneous In Situ Measurement in the Vadose Zone of Field‐Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity, Sorptivity and the Conductivity‐Pressure Head Relationship , 1986 .

[45]  D. Jaynes,et al.  Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in a cultivated field at different times , 1996 .

[46]  D. Elrick,et al.  Methods for Analyzing Constant‐Head Well Permeameter Data , 1992 .

[47]  D. E. Elrick,et al.  Ponded infiltration from a single ring : I. Analysis of steady flow , 1990 .