18O-Labeled Proteome Reference as Global Internal Standards for Targeted Quantification by Selected Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry*

Selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-MS is an emerging technology for high throughput targeted protein quantification and verification in biomarker discovery studies; however, the cost associated with the application of stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides as internal standards can be prohibitive for screening a large number of candidate proteins as often required in the preverification phase of discovery studies. Herein we present a proof of concept study using an 18O-labeled proteome reference as global internal standards (GIS) for SRM-based relative quantification. The 18O-labeled proteome reference (or GIS) can be readily prepared and contains a heavy isotope (18O)-labeled internal standard for every possible tryptic peptide. Our results showed that the percentage of heavy isotope (18O) incorporation applying an improved protocol was >99.5% for most peptides investigated. The accuracy, reproducibility, and linear dynamic range of quantification were further assessed based on known ratios of standard proteins spiked into the labeled mouse plasma reference. Reliable quantification was observed with high reproducibility (i.e. coefficient of variance <10%) for analyte concentrations that were set at 100-fold higher or lower than those of the GIS based on the light (16O)/heavy (18O) peak area ratios. The utility of 18O-labeled GIS was further illustrated by accurate relative quantification of 45 major human plasma proteins. Moreover, quantification of the concentrations of C-reactive protein and prostate-specific antigen was illustrated by coupling the GIS with standard additions of purified protein standards. Collectively, our results demonstrated that the use of 18O-labeled proteome reference as GIS provides a convenient, low cost, and effective strategy for relative quantification of a large number of candidate proteins in biological or clinical samples using SRM.

[1]  H. Rodriguez,et al.  Reconstructing the pipeline by introducing multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for cancer biomarker verification: An NCI‐CPTC initiative perspective , 2010, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[2]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Plasma proteome response to severe burn injury revealed by 18O-labeled "universal" reference-based quantitative proteomics. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[3]  Ying Jiang,et al.  Combination of improved (18)O incorporation and multiple reaction monitoring: a universal strategy for absolute quantitative verification of serum candidate biomarkers of liver cancer. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Enhanced Sensitivity for Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry-based Targeted Proteomics Using a Dual Stage Electrodynamic Ion Funnel Interface* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[5]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[6]  Susan E Abbatiello,et al.  Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in peptide quantification by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  Full Dynamic Range Proteome Analysis of S. cerevisiae by Targeted Proteomics , 2009, Cell.

[8]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Correlation between y-type ions observed in ion trap and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[9]  Xu Shi,et al.  Quantification of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Patient Plasma by Targeted Mass Spectrometry and Stable Isotope Dilution* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[10]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  A simple procedure for effective quenching of trypsin activity and prevention of 18O-labeling back-exchange. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[12]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multiple Reaction Monitoring-based, Multiplexed, Absolute Quantitation of 45 Proteins in Human Plasma* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Henry H. N. Lam,et al.  A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome , 2008, Nature Methods.

[14]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  S. Carr,et al.  Quantitative, Multiplexed Assays for Low Abundance Proteins in Plasma by Targeted Mass Spectrometry and Stable Isotope Dilution*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[16]  R. Beynon,et al.  Absolute Multiplexed Quantitative Analysis of Protein Expression during Muscle Development Using QconCAT* , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[17]  Vladislav A Petyuk,et al.  Spatial mapping of protein abundances in the mouse brain by voxelation integrated with high-throughput liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2007, Genome research.

[18]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Chemically etched open tubular and monolithic emitters for nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Steven A Carr,et al.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Leigh Anderson,et al.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometric Multiple Reaction Monitoring Assays for Major Plasma Proteins* , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  Krzysztof J Cios,et al.  Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[22]  R. Beynon,et al.  Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides , 2005, Nature Methods.

[23]  Ronald J Moore,et al.  Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Human Plasma following in Vivo Lipopolysaccharide Administration Using 16O/18O Labeling and the Accurate Mass and Time Tag Approach*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  Tsuyoshi Tabata,et al.  Quantitative mouse brain proteomics using culture-derived isotope tags as internal standards , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Robertson Craig,et al.  Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. , 2004, Journal of proteome research.

[26]  J. Yates,et al.  Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  D. Muddiman,et al.  A method for calculating 16o/18o peptide ion ratios for the relative quantification of proteomes , 2004, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[28]  P. Ridker,et al.  Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and the Calculated Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score , 2003, Circulation.

[29]  Natalia S. Rost,et al.  Plasma Concentration of C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: The Framingham Study , 2001, Stroke.

[30]  P. Tempst,et al.  Enzymatic Digestion of Proteins in Solution , 1995, Current protocols in protein science.

[31]  Ronald J. Moore,et al.  Large-scale multiplexed quantitative discovery proteomics enabled by the use of an (18)O-labeled "universal" reference sample. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[32]  Jennifer A. Siepen,et al.  Prediction of missed cleavage sites in tryptic peptides aids protein identification in proteomics. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.