MILACC study: could undetected lymph node micrometastases have impacted recurrence rate in the LACC trial?

Objective The etiology of inferior oncologic outcomes associated with minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer remains unknown. Manipulation of lymph nodes with previously unrecognized low-volume disease might explain this finding. We re-analyzed lymph nodes by pathologic ultrastaging in node-negative patients who recurred in the LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) trial. Methods Included patients were drawn from the LACC trial database, had negative lymph nodes on routine pathologic evaluation, and recurred to the abdomen and/or pelvis. Patients without recurrence or without available lymph node tissue were excluded. Paraffin tissue blocks and slides from all lymph nodes removed by lymphadenectomy were re-analyzed per standard ultrastaging protocol aimed at the detection of micrometastases (>0.2 mm and ≤2 mm) and isolated tumor cells (clusters up to 0.2 mm or <200 cells). Results The study included 20 patients with median age of 42 (range 30–68) years. Most patients were randomized to minimally invasive surgery (90%), had squamous cell carcinoma (65%), FIGO 2009 stage 1B1 (95%), grade 2 (60%) disease, had no adjuvant treatment (75%), and had a single site of recurrence (55%), most commonly at the vaginal cuff (45%). Only one patient had pelvic sidewall recurrence in the absence of other disease sites. The median number of lymph nodes analyzed per patient was 18.5 (range 4–32) for a total of 412 lymph nodes. A total of 621 series and 1242 slides were reviewed centrally by the ultrastaging protocol. No metastatic disease of any size was found in any lymph node. Conclusions There were no lymph node low-volume metastases among patients with initially negative lymph nodes who recurred in the LACC trial. Therefore, it is unlikely that manipulation of lymph nodes containing clinically undetected metastases is the underlying cause of the higher local recurrence risk in the minimally invasive arm of the LACC trial.

[1]  F. Landoni,et al.  Stratification of lymph node metastases as macrometastases, micrometastases, or isolated tumor cells has no clinical implication in patients with cervical cancer: Subgroup analysis of the SCCAN project. , 2022, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  H. Kanao,et al.  Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review , 2022, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[3]  M. Plante,et al.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for Cervical Cancer in Light of the LACC Trial: What Have We Learned? , 2022, Current oncology.

[4]  R. Jach,et al.  SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy , 2022, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[5]  M. Leitao,et al.  Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical Approach , 2022, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[6]  X. Paoletti,et al.  Clinical impact of low-volume lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer: A comprehensive meta-analysis. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  Jonathan E. Shoag,et al.  Effect of a Randomized, Controlled Trial on Surgery for Cervical Cancer. , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  E. De Ponti,et al.  Correction to: The impact of low-volume metastasis on disease-free survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer , 2020, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Jach,et al.  SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[10]  L. Dušek,et al.  Micrometastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Represent a Significant Negative Prognostic Factor in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study , 2020, Cancers.

[11]  P. Mathevet,et al.  The Clinical Impact of Low-Volume Lymph Nodal Metastases in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: The Senticol 1 and Senticol 2 Trials , 2020, Cancers.

[12]  FIGO statement on minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer , 2020, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[13]  P. Dundr,et al.  Pathologic Protocols for Sentinel Lymph Nodes Ultrastaging in Cervical Cancer. , 2019, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[14]  A. Nica,et al.  Does small volume metastatic lymph node disease affect long-term prognosis in early cervical cancer? , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[15]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) statement , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[16]  F. Guyon,et al.  SUCCOR study. An international european cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009, <4 cm) cervical cancer operated in 2013–2014 , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[17]  R. Kimmig,et al.  Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[18]  S. Marnitz,et al.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff – a multicenter analysis , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[19]  P. Mathevet,et al.  Impact of micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells on recurrence and survival in patients with early cervical cancer: SENTICOL Trial , 2019, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[20]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[21]  V. Gebski,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  V. Gebski,et al.  Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[23]  A. Oliani,et al.  Lymph node micrometastases in initial stage cervical cancer and tumoral recurrence , 2016, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  G. Kenter,et al.  Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[25]  R. Barakat,et al.  Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  W. Ye,et al.  Identification of Micrometastases in Histologically Negative Lymph Nodes of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  B N Bundy,et al.  A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[29]  R. Barakat,et al.  Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.