GATA3 Immunohistochemistry Expression in Histologic Subtypes of Primary Breast Carcinoma and Metastatic Breast Carcinoma Cytology

GATA3 plays a role in cell proliferation and differentiation in many tissues, including breast, and it has been suggested that GATA3 expression correlates with ER expression. However, little is known on GATA3 expression in various subtypes of breast carcinoma, its utilization in cytology, and on how GATA3 performs in comparison with GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin. Eighty-four histology cases of breast carcinoma of various subtypes, including 28 triple-negative breast carcinomas, along with 20 cytology cases of metastatic breast carcinoma and 12 cytology cases of ER-positive metastatic gynecologic malignancies, were stained for GATA3, GCDFP-15, and mammaglobin. In non–triple-negative breast carcinomas (n=56), GATA3 showed 100% sensitivity, higher than GCDFP-15 (42.8%; P<0.0001) and mammaglobin (58.9%; P<0.0001), whereas staining patterns were similar for all the histologic subtypes examined. Staining scores were determined by multiplying the percentage of cancer cells staining with an intensity score of 1+, 2+, or 3+ (range, 0 to 300). In non–triple-negative carcinomas, GATA3 showed a mean score of 273.7, higher than GCDFP-15 (107.5; P<0.0001) and mammaglobin (147.7; P<0.0001). In triple-negative breast carcinomas (n=28), GATA3 showed a sensitivity of 60.7%, greater than GCDFP-15 (17.9%; P=0.0022) and mammaglobin (7.1%; P<0.0001). These results were consistent irrespective of the subtype examined. In breast carcinoma cytology cases, 100% stained with GATA3, higher than GCDFP-15 (20%; P<0.0001) and mammaglobin (45%; P<0.0001). None of the metastatic endometrial or ovarian carcinomas were positive for GATA3. Although GATA3 expression correlates with ER expression in breast, no correlation is observed in gynecologic malignancies. Thus, in working up ER-positive metastatic malignancies GATA3 demonstrates specificity for breast.

[1]  J. Palazzo,et al.  The significance of GATA 3 expression in breast cancer : a 10-year follow-up study , 2017 .

[2]  Andrew H. Beck,et al.  The Novel Marker GATA3 is Significantly More Sensitive Than Traditional Markers Mammaglobin and GCDFP15 for Identifying Breast Cancer in Surgical and Cytology Specimens of Metastatic and Matched Primary Tumors , 2016, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[3]  C. Cohen,et al.  Utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma in cytology specimens , 2015, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[4]  Yunni-Yi Chen,et al.  Diagnostic utility and sensitivities of GATA3 antibodies in triple-negative breast cancer. , 2014, Human pathology.

[5]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Semiquantitative GATA-3 immunoreactivity in breast, bladder, gynecologic tract, and other cytokeratin 7-positive carcinomas. , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  A. Sahin,et al.  Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas and breast carcinomas: a comparative study. , 2014, Human pathology.

[7]  J. Prichard,et al.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA-3 expression in ER-negative breast carcinomas. , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.

[8]  M. Walsh,et al.  GATA3: A promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens , 2014, Cancer cytopathology.

[9]  E. Brogi,et al.  In Search of the Ideal Immunopanel to Distinguish Metastatic Mammary Carcinoma From Primary Lung Carcinoma: A Tissue Microarray Study of 207 Cases , 2014, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[10]  Markku Miettinen,et al.  GATA3: A Multispecific But Potentially Useful Marker in Surgical Pathology A Systematic Analysis of 2500 Epithelial and Nonepithelial Tumors , 2014, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[11]  N. Ordóñez Value of GATA3 Immunostaining in Tumor Diagnosis: A Review , 2013, Advances in anatomic pathology.

[12]  Marc K Halushka,et al.  GATA3 expression in breast carcinoma: utility in triple-negative, sarcomatoid, and metastatic carcinomas. , 2013, Human pathology.

[13]  M. Wilkerson,et al.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA3 expression in tumors and normal tissues: a useful immunomarker for breast and urothelial carcinomas. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  A. Franchi,et al.  Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analysis of a case series. , 2011, Human pathology.

[15]  I. Shih,et al.  Gene expression signatures differentiate ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma from breast carcinoma in effusions. , 2011, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[16]  G. Blobel,et al.  GATA Transcription Factors and Cancer. , 2010, Genes & cancer.

[17]  H. Turna,et al.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic evaluation of invasive breast carcinoma molecular subtypes and GATA3 expression. , 2010, Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology.

[18]  D. Krahl,et al.  Expression pattern of GATA‐3 in embryonic and fetal human skin suggests a role in epidermal and follicular morphogenesis , 2010, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[19]  Z. Werb,et al.  GATA3 in development and cancer differentiation: Cells GATA have it! , 2010, Journal of cellular physiology.

[20]  Soumen Paul,et al.  GATA3 Is Selectively Expressed in the Trophectoderm of Peri-implantation Embryo and Directly Regulates Cdx2 Gene Expression* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  J. Palazzo,et al.  The significance of GATA3 expression in breast cancer: a 10-year follow-up study. , 2009, Human pathology.

[22]  J. Higgins,et al.  Expression of the Urothelial Differentiation Markers GATA3 and Placental S100 (S100P) in Female Genital Tract Transitional Cell Proliferations , 2009, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[23]  F. Bertucci,et al.  Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[24]  T. Nielsen,et al.  GATA-3 Expression in Breast Cancer Has a Strong Association with Estrogen Receptor but Lacks Independent Prognostic Value , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[25]  Robert J. Marinelli,et al.  Placental S100 (S100P) and GATA3: Markers for Transitional Epithelium and Urothelial Carcinoma Discovered by Complementary DNA Microarray , 2007, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[26]  Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat,et al.  Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  Zena Werb,et al.  GATA-3 Maintains the Differentiation of the Luminal Cell Fate in the Mammary Gland , 2006, Cell.

[28]  C. Kaufman,et al.  GATA-3: an unexpected regulator of cell lineage determination in skin. , 2003, Genes & development.

[29]  R. Weigel,et al.  GATA‐3 is expressed in association with estrogen receptor in breast cancer , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[30]  J. Leiden,et al.  Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage , 1996, Nature.

[31]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Murine and human T-lymphocyte GATA-3 factors mediate transcription through a cis-regulatory element within the human T-cell receptor delta gene enhancer , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.