Comparison of boundary and size effect models based on new developments

Abstract Hoover, Bazant and colleagues have published a number of papers in recent years (Bazant and Yu, 2009; Yu, 2010; Hoover and Bazant, 2013a, 2013b, 2014) on comparisons between Bazant size effect model (SEM) and Hu-Duan boundary effect model (BEM) for quasi-brittle fracture of concrete. With the recent developments of BEM (Wang et al., 2016; Guan et al., 2016; Wang and Hu, 2017) on irregular and discrete crack growth in concrete shaped by coarse aggregate structures, it is time to clarify issues on the SEM and BEM comparison raised by Bazant and Yu (2009), Yu (2010), Hoover and Bazant (2013a, 2013b, 2014). The experimental results of Hoover and Bazant (2013a, 2013b, 2014) are analyzed again using BEM, and new findings and in-depth understandings that have not been achieved by SEM are presented in this study. BEM is one concise equation, containing only two fundamental material constants, tensile strength ft and fracture toughness KIC, applicable to both notched and un-notched concrete specimens. Most importantly, BEM explains the inevitable influence of coarse aggregate structures on quasi-brittle fracture of concrete through modeling irregular and discrete crack formations and by considering the critical role of the maximum aggregate dmax. In contrast, SEM has three different equations, one for notched, one for un-notched, and one for shallow-notch specimens, containing total 18 empirical parameters to be determined from curve fitting. Despite with the staggering 18 parameters, the three SEM equations still overlook the crucial role of coarse aggregate structures in concrete fracture; dmax and discrete crack formation are not considered. After establishing the relation between discrete fictitious crack formation Δafic and dmax at the peak load Pmax based on four different sets of independently obtained experimental results of concrete and rock with dmax from 2 to 10 and 19 mm, BEM becomes a predictive design model which only needs strength ft and toughness KIC.

[1]  K. Otsuka,et al.  Fracture process zone in concrete tension specimen , 2000 .

[2]  K. Ohno.  Identification of the fracture process zone in concrete materials by acoustic emission , 2021, Acoustic Emission and Related Non-Destructive Evaluation Techniques in the Fracture Mechanics of Concrete.

[3]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Comparison of the Hu-Duan Boundary Effect Model with the Size-Shape Effect Law for Quasi-Brittle Fracture Based on New Comprehensive Fracture Tests , 2014 .

[4]  Masayasu Ohtsu,et al.  Fracture process zone in notched concrete beam under three-point bending by acoustic emission , 2014 .

[5]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Size effects of Types 1 & 2, crack length effect and postpeak , 2013 .

[6]  Héctor Cifuentes,et al.  Measuring the Size‐Independent Fracture Energy of Concrete , 2013 .

[7]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Determination of Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness of Granite Using Notched Three-Point-Bend Samples , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[8]  S. E. Swartz,et al.  Evaluation of Recently Proposed Recommendations for the Determination of Fracture Parameters for Concrete in Bending , 1986 .

[9]  S. E. Swartz,et al.  Influence of Size Effects on Opening Mode Fracture Parameters for Precracked Concrete Beams in Bending , 1989 .

[10]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Specimen boundary induced size effect on quasi‐brittle fracture , 2004 .

[11]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Fracture energy and fracture process zone , 1992 .

[12]  M.R.A. van Vliet,et al.  Influence of microstructure of concrete on size/scale effects in tensile fracture , 2003 .

[13]  Zhimin Wu,et al.  Influence of local fracture energy distribution on maximum fracture load of three-point-bending notched concrete beams , 2011 .

[14]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Two Parameter Fracture Model for Concrete , 1985 .

[15]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Comprehensive concrete fracture tests: Description and results , 2013 .

[16]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete mixes by the tri-linear model , 2013 .

[17]  Alexander Blake.  Practical Fracture Mechanics in Design , 1996 .

[18]  S. Şener,et al.  Size effect tests of different notch depth specimens with support rotation measurements , 2016 .

[19]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Size effect in shallow and deep notched quasi-brittle structures , 1999 .

[20]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Problems with Hu-Duan Boundary Effect Model and Its Comparison to Size-Shape Effect Law for Quasi-Brittle Fracture , 2010 .

[21]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Correlation between Cohesive Crack-Tip Local Fracture Energy and Peak Load in Mortar Beams , 2014 .

[22]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Scaling of quasi-brittle fracture: Boundary and size effect , 2006 .

[23]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Size effect on toughness induced by crack close to free surface , 2000 .

[24]  H. Saunders,et al.  Book Reviews : Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures - Application of Fracture Mechanics: S.T. Rolfe and J.M. Barsom Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977 , 1979 .

[25]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Size effect and quasi-brittle fracture: the role of FPZ , 2008 .

[26]  A. Carpinteri.  Scaling laws and renormalization groups for strength and toughness of disordered materials , 1994 .

[27]  Xiao Hu,et al.  WEIBULL-STRENGTH SIZE EFFECT AND COMMON PROBLEMS WITH SIZE EFFECT MODELS , 2013 .

[28]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of concrete from three-point bend and wedge splitting tests , 2003 .

[29]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Determination of size-independent specific fracture energy of normal- and high-strength self-compacting concrete from wedge splitting tests , 2013 .

[30]  Sidney Mindess,et al.  Fracture toughness testing of cement and concrete , 1984 .

[31]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Determination of tensile strength and fracture toughness of concrete using notched 3-p-b specimens , 2016 .

[32]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Mechanism behind the Size Effect Phenomenon , 2010 .

[33]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Fracture process zone size and true fracture energy of concrete using acoustic emission , 2010 .

[34]  Qingbin Li,et al.  In-depth analysis of notched 3-p-b concrete fracture , 2016 .

[35]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Multifractal scaling law: an extensive application to nominal strength size effect of concrete structures , 1995 .

[36]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[37]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Universal Size Effect Law and Effect of Crack Depth on Quasi-Brittle Structure Strength , 2009 .

[38]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete , 1990 .

[39]  J. Mier,et al.  3D lattice type fracture model for concrete , 2003 .

[40]  Hamid Sadouki,et al.  Simulation and analysis of composite structures , 1985 .

[41]  D. Vavřík,et al.  X-ray dynamic observation of the evolution of the fracture process zone in a quasi-brittle specimen , 2015 .

[42]  Bhushan Lal Karihaloo,et al.  Size effect in concrete beams , 2003 .

[43]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Boundary effect on concrete fracture and non-constant fracture energy distribution , 2003 .

[44]  Z. Bažant.  Size Effect in Blunt Fracture: Concrete, Rock, Metal , 1984 .

[45]  Shutong Yang,et al.  An analytical model to predict the effective fracture toughness of concrete for three-point bending notched beams , 2006 .

[46]  Sidney Mindess,et al.  The J-integral as a fracture criterion for fiber reinforced concrete , 1977 .

[47]  Xiaozhi Hu.  Size effect on tensile softening relation , 2011 .