Notes on cartography and further explanation

Abstract This article addresses one particular aspect of the cartographic enterprise, the cartographic study of the left periphery of the clause, the system of criteria, and the “syntacticisation” of scope-discourse semantics that rich and detailed syntactic maps make possible. I will compare this theoretical option with the conceivable alternative, the “pragmaticization” of a radically impoverished syntax, and will discuss some simple kinds of empirical evidence bearing on the choice between these alternative perspectives. I will then turn to the issue of whether the properties of the functional sequence (ordering, cooccurrence restrictions) are amenable to “further explanations” in terms of more basic principles constraining linguistic computations. I will argue that the search for deeper explanations is an integral part of the cartographic endeavour: it presupposes the establishment of reliable maps, and nourishes the pursuit of further cartographic questions. I will conclude by illustrating the issue of further explanation by comparing certain properties of topicalization in English and Italian, in particular the fact that DP topics are fundamentally unique in English, while they can be freely reiterated in Italian. This pattern can be plausibly traced back to intervention locality, once certain independent properties distinguishing Italian and English topicalization are taken into account.

[1]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children's comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian , 2012 .

[2]  Paola Benincà The left periphery of medieval romance , 2004 .

[3]  M. A. Browning,et al.  CP recursion and that-t effects , 1996 .

[4]  Adam Ledgeway,et al.  Il sistema completivo dei dialetti meridionali : la doppia serie di complementatori , 2003 .

[5]  Gillian Catriona Ramchand,et al.  Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: Conclusion , 2008 .

[6]  Margarita Suner,et al.  V-movement and the licensing of argumental Wh-phrases in Spanish , 1994 .

[7]  Ur Shlonsky,et al.  Where's ‘Why’? , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  L. Rizzi Comparative syntax and language acquisition , 2000 .

[9]  M. Frascarelli,et al.  Types of topics in German and Italian , 2007 .

[10]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Locality and Left Periphery , 2004 .

[11]  Richard S. Kayne Connectedness and binary branching , 1984 .

[12]  Ur Shlonsky Subject positions and copular constructions , 2000 .

[13]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Verbal argument structure: Events and participants , 2013 .

[14]  C. Poletto,et al.  "Rhetorical" wh-phrases in the left periphery of the sentence , 2000 .

[15]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[16]  CARLO CECCHETTO,et al.  Doubling structures and reconstruction , 2000 .

[17]  Raffaella Paul Zanuttini,et al.  Exclamative Clauses: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface , 2003 .

[18]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  Transitivity failures in the left periphery and foot-driven movement operations , 2006 .

[19]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Toward a cartography of subject positions , 2004 .

[20]  Nicola Munaro,et al.  Quʼest-ce-que (qu)-est-ce-que?: A Case Study in Comparative Romance Interrogative Syntax , 2008 .

[21]  Yosuke Fukumoto,et al.  Locality and Information Structure: A Cartographic Approach to Japanese , 2011 .

[22]  Noam Chomsky Approaching UG from Below , 2006 .

[23]  C. Poletto,et al.  Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers , 2004 .

[24]  I. Roberts,et al.  COMPLEX INVERSION IN FRENCH , 2018, Diachronic and Comparative Syntax.

[25]  Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai,et al.  Left periphery and how-why alternations , 2008 .

[26]  Heidi Harley A Minimalist Approach to Argument Structure , 2011 .

[27]  Hans-Georg Obenauer ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF EMPTY CATEGORIES , 1985 .

[28]  Bernd Heine,et al.  World Lexicon of Grammaticalization , 2019 .

[29]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects. , 2006 .

[30]  Klaus Abels,et al.  The Italian Left Periphery: A View from Locality , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Ur Shlonsky,et al.  The Cartographic Enterprise in Syntax , 2010, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[32]  Sandra Paoli,et al.  The fine structure of the left periphery: COMPs and subjects Evidence from Romance , 2007 .

[33]  Jean-Yves Pollock,et al.  On Wh-clitics, Wh-doubling and Apparent Wh in situ in French and some North Eastern Italian Dialects , 2005 .

[34]  L. Rizzi The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[35]  A. Belletti,et al.  Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies , 2009 .

[36]  Waltraud Paul Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese , 2005 .

[37]  K. A. Jayaseelan TOPIC, FOCUS AND ADVERB POSITIONS IN CLAUSE STRUCTURE , 2008 .

[38]  H. Koopman,et al.  VARIABLES AND THE BIJECTION PRINCIPLE , 1982 .

[39]  Mara Frascarelli,et al.  Is Topic a Root Phenomenon , 2010 .

[40]  I. Roberts Diachrony and Cartography: Paths of Grammaticalization and the Clausal Hierarchy1 , 2012 .

[41]  Peggy Speas,et al.  Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles , 2011 .

[42]  G. Salvi,et al.  Some firm points on Latin word order: The left periphery , 2005 .

[43]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck Alternatives to Cartography , 2009 .

[44]  Mara Frascarelli,et al.  Focus in the Force-Fin system: Information structure in Cushitic languages , 2007 .

[45]  Michal Starke,et al.  Nanosyntax : A short primer to a new approach to language , 2010 .

[46]  Adriana Belletti,et al.  Structures and Strategies , 2008 .

[47]  G. Cinque The Movement Nature of Left Dislocation , 1977 .

[48]  Elizabeth Pearce,et al.  Topic and focus in a head-initial language: Maori , 1999 .

[49]  Jan Koster,et al.  Locality principles in syntax , 1978 .

[50]  Stephanie Durrleman The syntax of Jamaican Creole : a cartographic perspective , 2008 .

[51]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Beyond explanatory adequacy . Eliminating labels , 2001 .

[52]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , 2009 .