On the interrelations between topography, soil depth, soil moisture, transpiration rates and species distribution at the hillslope scale

Relations between the spatial patterns of soil moisture, soil depth, and transpiration and their influence on the hillslope water balance are not well understood. When determining a water balance for a hillslope, small scale variations in soil depth are often ignored. In this study we found that these variations in soil depth can lead to distinct patterns in transpiration rates across a hillslope. We measured soil moisture content at 0.05 and 0.10 m depth intervals between the soil surface and the soil–bedrock boundary on 64 locations across the trenched hillslope in the Panola Mountain Research Watershed, Georgia, USA. We related these soil moisture data to transpiration rates measured in 14 trees across the hillslope using 28 constant heat sapflow sensors. Results showed a lack of spatial structure in soil moisture across the hillslope and with depth when the hillslope was in either the wet or the dry state. However, during the short transition period between the wet and dry state, soil moisture did become spatially organized with depth and across the hillslope. Variations in soil depth and thus total soil water stored in the soil profile at the end of the wet season caused differences in soil moisture content and transpiration rates between upslope and midslope sections at the end of the summer. In the upslope section, which has shallower soils, transpiration became limited by soil moisture while in the midslope section with deeper soils, transpiration was not limited by soil moisture. These spatial differences in soil depth, total water available at the end of the wet season and soil moisture content during the summer appear responsible for the observed spatial differences in basal area and species distribution between the upslope and midslope sections of the hillslope.

[1]  M. Roderick,et al.  Co‐Evolution of Climate, Soil and Vegetation , 2006 .

[2]  M. G. Anderson Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. , 2005 .

[3]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[4]  Marnik Vanclooster,et al.  Intraseasonal dynamics of soil moisture variability within a small agricultural maize cropped field , 2002 .

[5]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[6]  George H. Hargreaves,et al.  Moisture availability and crop production. , 1975 .

[7]  J. Famiglietti,et al.  Variability in surface moisture content along a hillslope transect: Rattlesnake Hill, Texas , 1998 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[9]  M. Sivapalan Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: is there a connection? , 2003 .

[10]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Ecohydrology—a challenging multidisciplinary research perspective , 2003 .

[11]  T. Huntington,et al.  Calcium depletion in a Southeastern United States forest ecosystem , 2000 .

[12]  A. W. Warrick,et al.  13 – Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties in the Field , 1980 .

[13]  W. Nuttle Eco‐hydrology's past and future in focus , 2002 .

[14]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate‐soil‐vegetation dynamies , 2000 .

[15]  R. Oren,et al.  Species differences in stomatal control of water loss at the canopy scale in a mature bottomland deciduous forest , 2003 .

[16]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  Derived functions of time domain reflectometry for soil moisture measurement , 1999 .

[17]  L. Nyberg Spatial variability of soil water content in the covered catchment at Gårdsjön, Sweden , 1996 .

[18]  Barbara J. Bond,et al.  Hydrology and ecology meet—and the meeting is good , 2003 .

[19]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Canopy and hydraulic conductance in young, mature and old Douglas-fir trees. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[20]  George M. Hornberger,et al.  Soil moisture gradients and controls on a southern Appalachian hillslope from drought through recharge , 1998 .

[21]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  On the spatial and temporal links between vegetation, climate, and soil moisture , 1999 .

[22]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[23]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Base cation concentrations in subsurface flow from a forested hillslope: The role of flushing frequency , 1998 .

[24]  Keith Beven,et al.  NEW METHOD DEVELOPED FOR STUDYING FLOW ON HILLSLOPES , 1996 .

[25]  Francesco Laio,et al.  Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: IV. Discussion of real cases , 2001 .

[26]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Stochastic soil moisture dynamics along a hillslope , 2003 .

[27]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices , 1999 .

[28]  John F. Dowd,et al.  Runoff generation in relation to soil moisture patterns in a small Dartmoor catchment, Southwest England , 2003 .

[29]  K. Beven,et al.  TOPOGRAPHIC CONTROLS ON SUBSURFACE STORM FLOWAT THE HILLSLOPE SCALE FOR TWO HYDROLOGICALLY DISTINCT SMALL CATCHMENTS , 1997 .

[30]  K. Katzensteiner,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of the soil water content in a mixed Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.)–European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand , 2003 .

[31]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[32]  F. Anctil,et al.  Geostatistics of near-surface moisture in bare cultivated organic soils , 2002 .

[33]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  Plants in water-controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: II. Probabilistic soil moisture dynamics , 2001 .

[34]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[35]  A. Granier Une nouvelle méthode pour la mesure du flux de sève brute dans le tronc des arbres , 1985 .

[36]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Factors controlling evaporation and energy partitioning beneath a deciduous forest over an annual cycle , 2000 .

[37]  Mary S. Lear,et al.  Spatial distribution of soil moisture over 6 and 30 cm depth, Mahurangi river catchment, New Zealand , 2003 .

[38]  Z. Kundzewicz Ecohydrology—seeking consensus on interpretation of the notion / Ecohydrologie—à la recherche d'un consensus sur l'interprétation de la notion , 2002 .

[39]  A. Granier,et al.  Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. , 1987, Tree physiology.

[40]  N. Peters,et al.  Dry deposition and canopy leaching rates in deciduous and coniferous forests of the Georgia Piedmont: an assessment of a regression model , 1995 .

[41]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns: Local and nonlocal controls , 1997 .