A Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Framework for Design Studies of an Ecient Supersonic Air Vehicle

A modular multidisciplinary analysis and optimization framework tool has been built with the goal of optimally designing a supersonic aircraft. This paper addresses the specic challenge of designing an ecient long range supersonic bomber aircraft. This framework includes all the disciplines normally required for supersonic aircraft design and it also includes disciplines specically required by an advanced military aircraft that is tailless and has embedded engines. Results from running the analysis framework for a B-58 supersonic bomber test case are presented as a validation of the methods employed.

[1]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Air-Combat Strategy Using Approximate Dynamic Programming , 2008 .

[2]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Towards Flying Qualities Constraints in the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Supersonic Tailless Aircraft , 2012 .

[3]  Joachim Kurzke Effects of Inlet Flow Distortion on the Performance of Aircraft Gas Turbines , 2008 .

[4]  D. C. Jenn,et al.  Radar and laser cross section engineering , 2005 .

[5]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Simultaneous Airframe and Propulsion Cycle Optimization for Supersonic Aircraft Design , 2008 .

[6]  Razvan Virgil Florea,et al.  Optimization of Bleed-Flow-Control for an Aggressive Serpentine Duct , 2005 .

[7]  Brian G. Allan,et al.  Boundary-Layer-Ingesting Inlet Flow Control , 2013 .

[8]  John Paterson,et al.  Overview of Low Observable Technology and Its Effects on Combat Aircraft Survivability , 1999 .

[9]  Filippos Chatzigeorgiadis,et al.  Development of Code for a Physical Optics Radar Cross Section Prediction and Analysis Application , 2004 .

[10]  John E. Bussoletti,et al.  "Fundamental" Parameteric Geometry Representations for Aircraft Component Shapes , 2006 .

[11]  David J. Arend,et al.  CFD Models of a Serpentine Inlet, Fan, and Nozzle , 2010 .

[12]  E. R. Phelps,et al.  Pressure Distributions at Mach Numbers of 1.6 and 1.9 of a Conically Cambered Wing of Triangular Plan Form With and Without Pylon-Mounted Engine Nacelles , 1956 .

[13]  Michael T. Tong,et al.  An Object-Oriented Computer Code for Aircraft Engine Weight Estimation , 2008 .

[14]  Louis J. Ghosn,et al.  A Computer Code for Gas Turbine Engine Weight and Disk Life Estimation , 2004 .

[15]  I. H. Rettie,et al.  Role of Figures of Merit in Design Optimization and Technology Assessment , 1981 .

[16]  Harry W. Carlson,et al.  Guide to AERO2S and WINGDES Computer Codes for Prediction and Minimization of Drag Due to Lift , 1997 .

[17]  Rakesh K. Kapania,et al.  Parametric Geometry Model for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Tailless Supersonic Aircraft , 2012 .

[18]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets , 2008 .

[19]  Kenneth T. Moore,et al.  Initial Multidisciplinary Design and Analysis Framework , 2010 .

[20]  Razvan Virgil Florea,et al.  Preliminary Design for Embedded Engine Systems , 2009 .

[21]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Thermal-Structural Design and Optimization of Engine Exhaust-Washed Structures , 2011 .

[22]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[23]  J. Seddon,et al.  Intake Aerodynamics, Second Edition , 1999 .

[24]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .