Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening following BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing.

PURPOSE Despite the widespread availability of genetic testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations, little is known about the impact of testing on ovarian cancer prevention and screening. For mutation testing to effect cancer mortality, positive test results must be followed by appropriate behavior change. In this study, we prospectively examined the impact of BRCA1/2 testing on the utilization of prophylactic oophorectomy and ovarian cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS Participants were 289 high-risk women who underwent genetic counseling and testing for alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes. We measured self-reported receipt of bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy (BPO) and utilization of CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) in the year following testing, and examined the impact of test results on these outcomes. In addition, we examined the role of sociodemographic, medical, family history, and psychological variables on the receipt of BPO, CA-125, and TVU. RESULTS Twenty-seven percent of mutation carriers, 5% of uninformative patients, and 2% of noncarriers received a BPO in the year following testing. In addition to test results, perceived risk for ovarian cancer and family history of ovarian cancer independently predicted receipt of BPO. The receipt of a positive test result was associated with increased utilization of CA-125 and TVU. Additional predictors included perceived risk for ovarian cancer (both CA-125 and TVU) and state anxiety (CA-125). CONCLUSION These results demonstrate the significant behavioral impact of receiving a positive BRCA1/2 test result. The increased rate of oophorectomy among mutation carriers suggests that testing for BRCA1/2 mutations may ultimately impact ovarian cancer mortality.

[1]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Utilization of breast cancer screening in a clinically based sample of women after BRCA1/2 testing. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[2]  D. Haber Prophylactic oophorectomy to reduce the risk of ovarian and breast cancer in carriers of BRCA mutations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Susan L Neuhausen,et al.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Satagopan,et al.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Neugut,et al.  Effect of prevention strategies on survival and quality-adjusted survival of women with BRCA1/2 mutations: an updated decision analysis. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Klijn,et al.  One Year Follow-Up of Women Opting for Presymptomatic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: Emotional Impact of the Test Outcome and Decisions on Risk Management (Surveillance or Prophylactic Surgery) , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  P. Stalmeier,et al.  Decision analysis of prophylactic surgery or screening for BRCA1 mutation carriers: a more prominent role for oophorectomy. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  S. Peacock,et al.  Worry about ovarian cancer risk and use of ovarian cancer screening by women at risk for ovarian cancer. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  A. Cull,et al.  Deciding about prophylactic oophorectomy: what is important to women at increased risk of ovarian cancer? , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[11]  A. Paterson,et al.  Oncology nurse training in cancer genetics , 2001, Journal of medical genetics.

[12]  C. Isaacs,et al.  BRCA1/2 testing: complex themes in result interpretation. , 2001, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. Schwartz,et al.  Cancer screening in a high risk population: a clinical trial. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  M. Daly,et al.  Anxiety/uncertainty reduction as a motivation for interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer. , 2001, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[15]  T. Rebbeck Prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  N. Hallowell A qualitative study of the information needs of high‐risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy , 2000, Psycho-oncology.

[17]  R. Croyle,et al.  Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[18]  G. Anderson,et al.  Reported Ovarian Cancer Screening Among a Population‐Based Sample in Washington State , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  P. Devilee,et al.  Presymptomatic DNA testing and prophylactic surgery in families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation , 2000, The Lancet.

[20]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Spiritual faith and genetic testing decisions among high-risk breast cancer probands. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[21]  J. Garber,et al.  Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Decision making about prophylactic oophorectomy among at-risk women: psychological influences and implications. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  P. Butow,et al.  Attitudes toward prophylactic oophorectomy and screening utilization in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. , 1999, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  O. Olopade,et al.  Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  N. Hallowell ‘You don’t want to lose your ovaries because you think ‘I might become a man' ’. Women's perceptions of prophylactic surgery as a cancer risk management option , 1998, Psycho-oncology.

[26]  J Chang-Claude,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  A. Neugut,et al.  Decision analysis of prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in BRCA1-positive or BRCA2-positive patients. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  B. Peshkin,et al.  Psychological distress in women seeking genetic counseling for breast-ovarian cancer risk: The contributions of personality and appraisal , 1997, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[29]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1997 .

[31]  K Offit,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. , 1997, JAMA.

[32]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  M. Seller,et al.  Unusual case of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome "type II". , 1995, American journal of medical genetics.

[34]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Utilization of ovarian cancer screening by women at increased risk. , 1995, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[35]  Robert C. Bast,et al.  Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and followup. , 1995, NIH consensus statement.

[36]  B. Trock,et al.  How valid are mammography self-reports? , 1990, American journal of public health.

[37]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress , 1979, Psychosomatic medicine.

[38]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  K. Rickels,et al.  Psychiatric illness in family practice. , 1980, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.