Spontaneous object-location memory based on environmental geometry is impaired by both hippocampal and dorsolateral striatal lesions

We examined the role of the hippocampus and the dorsolateral striatum in the representation of environmental geometry using a spontaneous object recognition procedure. Rats were placed in a kite-shaped arena and allowed to explore two distinctive objects in each of the right-angled corners. In a different room, rats were then placed into a rectangular arena with two identical copies of one of the two objects from the exploration phase, one in each of the two adjacent right-angled corners that were separated by a long wall. Time spent exploring these two objects was recorded as a measure of recognition memory. Since both objects were in different locations with respect to the room (different between exploration and test phases) and the global geometry (also different between exploration and test phases), differential exploration of the objects must be a result of initial habituation to the object relative to its local geometric context. The results indicated an impairment in processing the local geometric features of the environment for both hippocampus and dorsolateral striatum lesioned rats compared with sham-operated controls, though a control experiment showed these rats were unimpaired in a standard object recognition task. The dorsolateral striatum has previously been implicated in egocentric route-learning, but the results indicate an unexpected role for the dorsolateral striatum in processing the spatial layout of the environment. The results provide the first evidence that lesions to the hippocampus and dorsolateral striatum impair spontaneous encoding of local environmental geometric features.

[1]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Transfer of spatial search between environments in human adults and young children (Homo sapiens): implications for representation of local geometry by spatial systems. , 2014, Developmental psychobiology.

[2]  Qihua Tan,et al.  Genetic and environmental variation in educational attainment: an individual-based analysis of 28 twin cohorts , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[3]  M. Cossette,et al.  A limited role for the hippocampus in the modulation of novel-object preference by contextual cues. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[4]  E Save,et al.  Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  S. Chai,et al.  Multiple Memory Systems in the Brain , 2003 .

[6]  Emma R Wood,et al.  The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: Examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  A. Easton,et al.  Spontaneous object recognition memory is maintained following transformation of global geometric properties. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  T. Hartley,et al.  The Neurobiology of Mammalian Navigation , 2018, Current Biology.

[9]  Mark Haselgrove,et al.  Thinking outside of the box: Transfer of shape-based reorientation across the boundary of an arena , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  K. Bodily,et al.  Environmental Scaling Influences the Use of Local but Not Global Geometric Cues During Spatial Reorientation , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[12]  D. Nardi,et al.  Local Geometric Properties Do Not Support Reorientation in Hippocampus-Engaged Homing Pigeons , 2019, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Matthew G. Buckley,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Global Reorientation Following Transfer From the Inside to the Outside of an Arena , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition.

[14]  Andrew J.D. Nelson,et al.  Distributed interactive brain circuits for object-in-place memory: A place for time? , 2020, Brain and neuroscience advances.

[15]  E. Coutureau,et al.  Entorhinal but Not Hippocampal or Subicular Lesions Disrupt Latent Inhibition in Rats , 1999, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[16]  John O'Keefe,et al.  Local transformations of the hippocampal cognitive map , 2018, Science.

[17]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[18]  Enclosure size and the use of local and global geometric cues for reorientation , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  R. Passingham.  The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[20]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[21]  Verner P Bingman,et al.  Spared feature-structure discrimination but diminished salience of environmental geometry in hippocampal-lesioned homing pigeons (Columba livia). , 2006, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  D. Mumby,et al.  Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  N. White,et al.  Parallel Information Processing in the Dorsal Striatum: Relation to Hippocampal Function , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Distinct and combined responses to environmental geometry and features in a working-memory reorientation task in rats and chicks , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[25]  永福 智志.  The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[27]  M A Good,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  Joseph M. Austen,et al.  Dorsolateral striatal lesions impair navigation based on landmark-goal vectors but facilitate spatial learning based on a “cognitive map” , 2015, Learning & memory.

[29]  M. Mildner,et al.  Re-epithelialization and immune cell behaviour in an ex vivo human skin model , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Sophie L. Dix,et al.  Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  Bruce L. McNaughton,et al.  Spatial representation in the rat: Conceptual, behavioral, and neurophysiological perspectives , 1990 .

[32]  T. Bussey,et al.  Distinct patterns of behavioural impairments resulting from fornix transection or neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal and postrhinal cortices in the rat , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  P. Holland,et al.  Immediate response strategy and shift to place strategy in submerged T-maze. , 2013, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[36]  Verner P. Bingman,et al.  On the transfer of spatial learning between geometrically different shaped environments in the terrestrial toad, Rhinella arenarum , 2019, Animal Cognition.

[37]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Evidence That the Rat Hippocampus Has Contrasting Roles in Object Recognition Memory and Object Recency Memory , 2012, Behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[39]  D. Mumby,et al.  Object familiarization and novel-object preference in rats , 2010, Behavioural Processes.

[40]  A. Bennett,et al.  Do animals have cognitive maps? , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  Robert S. Gardner,et al.  Involvement of Lactate Transport in Two Object Recognition Tasks That Require Either the Hippocampus or Striatum , 2019, Behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  Emma R Wood,et al.  Associative recognition and the hippocampus: Differential effects of hippocampal lesions on object‐place, object‐context and object‐place‐context memory , 2009, Hippocampus.

[43]  Edward J Golob,et al.  Differences between appetitive and aversive reinforcement on reorientation in a spatial working memory task , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[45]  D. Mumby,et al.  Hippocampal damage and exploratory preferences in rats: memory for objects, places, and contexts. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[46]  R. C. Honey,et al.  The role of the hippocampus in mnemonic integration and retrieval: complementary evidence from lesion and inactivation studies , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  Rosamund F Langston,et al.  Lateral Entorhinal Cortex is Critical for Novel Object-Context Recognition , 2013, Hippocampus.

[48]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Re-orienting in space: do animals use global or local geometry strategies? , 2010, Biology Letters.

[49]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  V. Bingman,et al.  Telencephalic Neuronal Activation Associated with Spatial Memory in the Terrestrial Toad Rhinella arenarum: Participation of the Medial Pallium during Navigation by Geometry , 2016, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[51]  Mark Haselgrove,et al.  Thinking outside of the box II: Disrupting the cognitive map , 2019, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  N. Mackintosh.  Do not ask whether they have a cognitive map , but how they find their way about , 2002 .

[53]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[54]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Impaired processing of local geometric features during navigation in a water maze following hippocampal lesions in rats. , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.